Responding to Water Scarcity in Western Canada

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Texas Law Review Pub Date : 2006-01-11 DOI:10.7939/R3222RM41
D. Percy
{"title":"Responding to Water Scarcity in Western Canada","authors":"D. Percy","doi":"10.7939/R3222RM41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In any comparative survey of responses to water scarcity, a contribution from Canada is usually met with a sense of incredulity. Canada has a reputation for enjoying abundant freshwater supplies. Canada's experience in dealing with water scarcity is less well-known than its potential role of providing a solution to water shortages in arid parts of the United States through sometimes fantastic water diversion schemes. Although many plans have been suggested for transferring water from Canada to the United States, the two most notorious are the 1963 scheme by the North American Water and Power Alliance to dam major rivers in British Columbia and take water south through the Rocky Mountain trench, and the 1985 GRAND Canal project to divert water from James Bay in northern Quebec through the Great Lakes to the western United States. Despite the economic infeasibility of both schemes, they are frequently resurrected in popular writing about water. The impression of abundant Canadian water supplies suggested by such grandiose plans is fortified by the dubious distinction that Canadians are one of the most prolific consumers of water, per capita, in the world. This image of plenty is, however, misleading. Canada suffers regional water shortages, even in areas where water supply has traditionally been abundant. In western Canada, the threat of water shortages is more well known and has inspired water legislation since the earliest days of European settlement. This Article focuses on the experience of the prairie provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, which stretch northward from the 49th parallel to the 60th parallel and extend eastward from the Continental Divide to Hudson Bay and Lake of the Woods on the western boundary of Ontario. The southern regions of the prairie provinces are known as Palliser's Triangle, in homage to the leader of a Royal Geographical Society expedition from 1857 to 1860, who maintained that their arid climate would constitute a barrier to settlement. The area experiences annual precipitation of between 12 and 16 inches and suffers from chronic water shortages. The historical concern about lack of water in this region is exacerbated by the fact that most supplies in the area are drawn from the major glacier-fed river systems that have their source in the Rocky Mountains. The Athabasca glacier, which feeds the Saskatchewan River system, for example, has been receding at an accelerated rate since 1960 and is now shrinking at a rate equivalent to about 30 percent every century. In recent times, long-standing concerns about present and future water supplies have been increased by the rapid growth in the population and economy of the area.","PeriodicalId":47670,"journal":{"name":"Texas Law Review","volume":"83 1","pages":"2091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7939/R3222RM41","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

In any comparative survey of responses to water scarcity, a contribution from Canada is usually met with a sense of incredulity. Canada has a reputation for enjoying abundant freshwater supplies. Canada's experience in dealing with water scarcity is less well-known than its potential role of providing a solution to water shortages in arid parts of the United States through sometimes fantastic water diversion schemes. Although many plans have been suggested for transferring water from Canada to the United States, the two most notorious are the 1963 scheme by the North American Water and Power Alliance to dam major rivers in British Columbia and take water south through the Rocky Mountain trench, and the 1985 GRAND Canal project to divert water from James Bay in northern Quebec through the Great Lakes to the western United States. Despite the economic infeasibility of both schemes, they are frequently resurrected in popular writing about water. The impression of abundant Canadian water supplies suggested by such grandiose plans is fortified by the dubious distinction that Canadians are one of the most prolific consumers of water, per capita, in the world. This image of plenty is, however, misleading. Canada suffers regional water shortages, even in areas where water supply has traditionally been abundant. In western Canada, the threat of water shortages is more well known and has inspired water legislation since the earliest days of European settlement. This Article focuses on the experience of the prairie provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba, which stretch northward from the 49th parallel to the 60th parallel and extend eastward from the Continental Divide to Hudson Bay and Lake of the Woods on the western boundary of Ontario. The southern regions of the prairie provinces are known as Palliser's Triangle, in homage to the leader of a Royal Geographical Society expedition from 1857 to 1860, who maintained that their arid climate would constitute a barrier to settlement. The area experiences annual precipitation of between 12 and 16 inches and suffers from chronic water shortages. The historical concern about lack of water in this region is exacerbated by the fact that most supplies in the area are drawn from the major glacier-fed river systems that have their source in the Rocky Mountains. The Athabasca glacier, which feeds the Saskatchewan River system, for example, has been receding at an accelerated rate since 1960 and is now shrinking at a rate equivalent to about 30 percent every century. In recent times, long-standing concerns about present and future water supplies have been increased by the rapid growth in the population and economy of the area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对加拿大西部的水资源短缺
在任何对水资源短缺反应的比较调查中,来自加拿大的贡献通常会让人感到难以置信。加拿大以淡水供应丰富而闻名。加拿大在处理水资源短缺问题上的经验不如它在解决美国干旱地区水资源短缺问题上的潜在作用为人所知。虽然已经提出了许多从加拿大向美国输水的计划,但最臭名昭著的两个是1963年北美水电联盟在不列颠哥伦比亚省的主要河流上筑坝并通过落基山脉向南引水的计划,以及1985年从魁北克北部的詹姆斯湾通过五大湖向美国西部引水的大运河项目。尽管这两种方案在经济上都不可行,但它们在有关水的通俗文章中经常被提及。这些宏伟的计划给人的印象是,加拿大的水供应丰富,而加拿大人是世界上人均用水最多的国家之一,这一令人怀疑的区别强化了这一印象。然而,这种富足的形象具有误导性。加拿大饱受区域性水资源短缺之苦,即使在传统上供水充足的地区也是如此。在加拿大西部,水资源短缺的威胁更为人所知,自欧洲人最早定居以来,水资源立法一直受到启发。这篇文章的重点是艾伯塔省、萨斯喀彻温省和马尼托巴省的草原省份的经验,这些省份从北纬49度延伸到北纬60度,从大陆分水岭向东延伸到安大略省西部边界的哈德逊湾和森林湖。草原省份的南部地区被称为帕利瑟三角,以向1857年至1860年皇家地理学会探险队的领导人致敬,他坚持认为干旱的气候将构成定居的障碍。该地区年降水量在12到16英寸之间,长期缺水。由于该地区的大部分水源来自主要的冰川河流系统,而这些河流的源头又在落基山脉,这一事实加剧了人们对该地区缺水的历史担忧。例如,为萨斯喀彻温河系统提供水源的阿萨巴斯卡冰川自1960年以来一直在加速消退,现在以相当于每世纪30%的速度萎缩。近年来,由于该地区人口和经济的迅速增长,对当前和未来水供应的长期关注有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Texas Law Review is a national and international leader in legal scholarship. Texas Law Review is an independent journal, edited and published entirely by students at the University of Texas School of Law. Our seven issues per year contain articles by professors, judges, and practitioners; reviews of important recent books from recognized experts, essays, commentaries; and student written notes. Texas Law Review is currently the ninth most cited legal periodical in federal and state cases in the United States and the thirteenth most cited by legal journals.
期刊最新文献
Guarantor of Last Resort Demystifying Nationwide Injunctions Feminism and the Tournament Tracing Equity: Realizing and Allocating Value in Chapter 11 State Public-Law Litigation in an Age of Polarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1