Chickadee behavioural response to varying threat levels of predator and conspecific calls

Jenna V. Congdon, Allison H. Hahn, Neil McMillan, M. Avey, C. Sturdy
{"title":"Chickadee behavioural response to varying threat levels of predator and conspecific calls","authors":"Jenna V. Congdon, Allison H. Hahn, Neil McMillan, M. Avey, C. Sturdy","doi":"10.7939/R3FQ9QH5C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chickadees produce many vocalizations, including chick-a-dee calls which they use as a mobbing call in the presence of predators. Previous research has shown that chickadees produce more D notes in their mobbing calls in response to high-threat predators compared to low-threat predators, and may perceive predator and corresponding mobbing vocalizations as similar. We presented black-capped chickadees with playback of high- and low-threat predator calls and conspecific mobbing calls, and non-threat heterospecific and reversed mobbing calls, to examine vocal and movement behavioural responses. Chickadees produced more chick-a-dee calls in response to playback of calls produced by a high-threat predator compared to calls produced by a low-threat predator, and to reversed high-threat mobbing calls compared to normal (i.e., non-reversed) high-threat mobbing calls. Chickadees also vocalized more in response to all playback conditions consisting of conspecific mobbing calls compared to a silent baseline period. The number of D notes that the subjects produced was similar to previous findings; chickadees produced approximately one to three D notes per call in response to low-threat mobbing calls, and produced more calls containing four to five D notes in response to high-threat mobbing calls, although this difference in the number of D notes per call was not significant. The difference in chickadees’ production of tseet calls across playback conditions approached significance as chickadees called more in response to conspecific mobbing calls, but not in response to heterospecific calls. General movement activity decreased in response to playback of conspecific-produced vocalizations, but increased in response to heterospecific-produced vocalizations, suggesting that chickadees may mobilize more in response to predator playback in preparation for a “fight or flight” situation. These results also suggest that chickadees may produce more mobbing calls in response to high-threat predator vocalizations as an attempt to initiate mobbing with conspecifics, while they produce fewer mobbing calls in response to a low-threat predator that a chickadee could outmaneuver.","PeriodicalId":39712,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7939/R3FQ9QH5C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Chickadees produce many vocalizations, including chick-a-dee calls which they use as a mobbing call in the presence of predators. Previous research has shown that chickadees produce more D notes in their mobbing calls in response to high-threat predators compared to low-threat predators, and may perceive predator and corresponding mobbing vocalizations as similar. We presented black-capped chickadees with playback of high- and low-threat predator calls and conspecific mobbing calls, and non-threat heterospecific and reversed mobbing calls, to examine vocal and movement behavioural responses. Chickadees produced more chick-a-dee calls in response to playback of calls produced by a high-threat predator compared to calls produced by a low-threat predator, and to reversed high-threat mobbing calls compared to normal (i.e., non-reversed) high-threat mobbing calls. Chickadees also vocalized more in response to all playback conditions consisting of conspecific mobbing calls compared to a silent baseline period. The number of D notes that the subjects produced was similar to previous findings; chickadees produced approximately one to three D notes per call in response to low-threat mobbing calls, and produced more calls containing four to five D notes in response to high-threat mobbing calls, although this difference in the number of D notes per call was not significant. The difference in chickadees’ production of tseet calls across playback conditions approached significance as chickadees called more in response to conspecific mobbing calls, but not in response to heterospecific calls. General movement activity decreased in response to playback of conspecific-produced vocalizations, but increased in response to heterospecific-produced vocalizations, suggesting that chickadees may mobilize more in response to predator playback in preparation for a “fight or flight” situation. These results also suggest that chickadees may produce more mobbing calls in response to high-threat predator vocalizations as an attempt to initiate mobbing with conspecifics, while they produce fewer mobbing calls in response to a low-threat predator that a chickadee could outmaneuver.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
山雀对不同威胁等级的捕食者和同种叫声的行为反应
山雀会发出很多声音,包括在有捕食者的情况下,它们用这种叫声来群居。先前的研究表明,与低威胁的捕食者相比,山雀在面对高威胁的捕食者时,会在鸣叫时发出更多的D音,并且可能认为捕食者和相应的鸣叫相似。我们给黑冠山雀播放了高威胁和低威胁的捕食者叫声、同种的围捕叫声、非威胁的异种的和反向的围捕叫声,以检验声音和运动行为的反应。与低威胁捕食者发出的叫声相比,山雀在回放高威胁捕食者发出的叫声时发出了更多的“chick-a-dee”的叫声,与正常(即非逆转)高威胁捕食者发出的叫声相比,山雀发出了更多的“chick-a-dee”的叫声。与沉默的基准期相比,山雀在所有回放条件下也会发出更多的声音,包括同种蜂鸣声。受试者产生的D音符的数量与先前的发现相似;山雀在对低威胁的叫声做出反应时,每次呼叫产生大约1到3个D音,而在对高威胁的叫声做出反应时,每次呼叫产生更多包含4到5个D音的呼叫,尽管每次呼叫的D音数量差异并不显著。在不同的回放条件下,山雀产生集合呼叫的差异接近显著,因为山雀对同种蜂鸣声的响应更多,而对异种蜂鸣声的响应则没有。一般运动活动在播放同种鸣叫声时减少,而在播放异种鸣叫声时增加,这表明山雀在播放捕食者鸣叫声时可能会动员更多,为“战斗或逃跑”的情况做准备。这些结果还表明,山雀可能会对高威胁捕食者的叫声做出更多的蜂鸣声,以试图发起与同种动物的蜂鸣声,而山雀可能会对低威胁捕食者做出更少的蜂鸣声。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Probable Play Behavior in a Surgeonfish (Naso vlamingii ) A Case Study of Spontaneous Category Formation and Behavioral Expression in a Language-Trained Steller Sea Lion Eumetopias jubatus Effortful foraging activity for uncertain food in pigeons Do belugas send sound cues? -Experimental verification of blindfolded imitation among beluga- Comparison of Paired- and Multiple-Stimulus Preference Assessments using a Runway Task by Dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1