Esophageal Dilation in Patients with Achalasia Is a Predictive Factor for the Inability to Traverse the Esophagogastric Junction with a Manometric Catheter.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestion Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1159/000534448
Yoshimasa Hoshikawa, Eri Momma, Noriyuki Kawami, Katsuhiko Iwakiri
{"title":"Esophageal Dilation in Patients with Achalasia Is a Predictive Factor for the Inability to Traverse the Esophagogastric Junction with a Manometric Catheter.","authors":"Yoshimasa Hoshikawa, Eri Momma, Noriyuki Kawami, Katsuhiko Iwakiri","doi":"10.1159/000534448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The insertion of a high-resolution manometry (HRM) catheter into the stomach is essential for accurate manometric diagnoses; however, it is impossible in some cases due to the inability to traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Predictive factors for these patients have not been investigated in detail, necessitating time-consuming and burdensome procedures for investigators and patients. Therefore, the present study investigated the percentage of and risk factors for failed intubation at the EGJ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We initially reviewed the medical charts of consecutive HRM procedures performed at our hospital between September 2018 and January 2023. Patient characteristics and the findings of endoscopy and esophagography (where available) were compared between successful and failed procedures. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictive factors for the inability to traverse the EGJ. We then validated the predictive factors identified by reviewing consecutive procedures performed between February 2023 and August 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 781 procedures performed, 55 (7.0%) failed due to the inability to traverse the EGJ. Achalasia was the most common disorder in these procedures. An older age and dilated esophagus of &gt;34 mm were independent predictive factors for the inability to traverse the EGJ in patients with treatment-naïve achalasia. In the validation study, 7 out of 68 procedures (10.3%) failed due to the inability to traverse the EGJ. A flowchart using the findings of endoscopy and an esophageal diameter of &gt;34 mm predicted the inability to traverse the EGJ with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 86.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on an esophageal diameter &gt;34 mm and endoscopic findings, we predicted the inability to traverse the EGJ in more than 70% of patients. A multi-center prospective study is warranted in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"90-98"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The insertion of a high-resolution manometry (HRM) catheter into the stomach is essential for accurate manometric diagnoses; however, it is impossible in some cases due to the inability to traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Predictive factors for these patients have not been investigated in detail, necessitating time-consuming and burdensome procedures for investigators and patients. Therefore, the present study investigated the percentage of and risk factors for failed intubation at the EGJ.

Methods: We initially reviewed the medical charts of consecutive HRM procedures performed at our hospital between September 2018 and January 2023. Patient characteristics and the findings of endoscopy and esophagography (where available) were compared between successful and failed procedures. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictive factors for the inability to traverse the EGJ. We then validated the predictive factors identified by reviewing consecutive procedures performed between February 2023 and August 2023.

Results: Among the 781 procedures performed, 55 (7.0%) failed due to the inability to traverse the EGJ. Achalasia was the most common disorder in these procedures. An older age and dilated esophagus of >34 mm were independent predictive factors for the inability to traverse the EGJ in patients with treatment-naïve achalasia. In the validation study, 7 out of 68 procedures (10.3%) failed due to the inability to traverse the EGJ. A flowchart using the findings of endoscopy and an esophageal diameter of >34 mm predicted the inability to traverse the EGJ with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 86.9%.

Conclusion: Based on an esophageal diameter >34 mm and endoscopic findings, we predicted the inability to traverse the EGJ in more than 70% of patients. A multi-center prospective study is warranted in the future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贲门失弛缓症患者的食管扩张是无法使用测压导管穿过食管-胃交界处的一个预测因素。
引言:将高分辨率测压导管插入胃部对于准确的测压诊断至关重要;然而,在某些情况下,由于无法穿过食管胃交界处(EGJ),这是不可能的。这些患者的预测因素尚未得到详细调查,这使得研究人员和患者必须进行耗时且繁重的程序。因此,本研究调查了EGJ插管失败的百分比和风险因素。方法:我们初步回顾了2018年9月至2023年1月期间在我院进行的连续HRM手术的病历。比较成功和失败手术的患者特征以及内窥镜检查和食管造影检查结果(如有)。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定无法穿越EGJ的预测因素。然后,我们通过回顾2023年2月至2023年8月期间进行的连续手术,验证了确定的预测因素。结果:在进行的781次手术中,有55次(7.0%)因无法穿过EGJ而失败。失弛缓症是这些手术中最常见的病症。年龄较大且>;34mm是治疗早期贲门失弛缓症患者无法通过EGJ的独立预测因素。在验证研究中,68例手术中有7例(10.3%)因无法穿过EGJ而失败。使用内窥镜检查结果和>;34mm预测不能通过EGJ的敏感性为71.4%,特异性为86.9%;34mm和内窥镜检查结果,我们预测超过70%的患者无法穿过EGJ。未来有必要进行多中心前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of invasion depth of early colorectal cancer using Endoscopic ultrasonography and Magnifying chromoendoscopy: a meta-analysis. Effects of a protease inhibitor camostat mesilate on gut microbial function in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A pilot randomized placebo-controlled study. Surveillance after endoscopic resection for colorectal tumors: a comprehensive review. DYRK2 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition restriction in pancreatic cancer liver metastasis by inhibiting Twist. Endoscopic resection for colorectal tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1