Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience.

IF 1.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.4253/wjge.v15.i10.593
Syedreza Ali Haider, Gregory S Bills, C Prakash Gyawali, Passisd Laoveeravat, Jordan Miller, Samir Softic, Mihir S Wagh, Moamen Gabr
{"title":"Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy <i>vs</i> heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience.","authors":"Syedreza Ali Haider,&nbsp;Gregory S Bills,&nbsp;C Prakash Gyawali,&nbsp;Passisd Laoveeravat,&nbsp;Jordan Miller,&nbsp;Samir Softic,&nbsp;Mihir S Wagh,&nbsp;Moamen Gabr","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v15.i10.593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has been the traditional surgical treatment for achalasia. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has demonstrated similar clinical outcomes with shorter procedure times. Studies comparing the direct cost-effectiveness of POEM <i>vs</i> LHM are limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare costs of POEM <i>vs</i> LHM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review aimed to compare the outcomes and cost of clinical care between patients who underwent POEM and LHM procedures for achalasia. The study was conducted at a tertiary academic center from January 2019 to December 2020. Clinical outcomes, including post-operative Eckardt scores and adverse events, were assessed and compared between the two groups. Direct cost variance analysis was utilized to evaluate the cost of clinical care incurred by patients undergoing POEM in the year preceding the procedure, during the index admission, and one year post-procedure, in comparison to patients undergoing LHM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 30 patients were included (15 POEM and 15 LHM) in the study. Patients in the POEM group had a mean Eckardt score of 0.5 ± 0.5 post-procedure, which was no different from patients in the LHM group (0.7 ± 0.6, <i>P</i> = 0.17) indicating comparative efficacy. However, the total costs of the admission for the procedure in the LHM group were on average $1827 more expensive than in the POEM group (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Total healthcare costs one year prior to index procedure were $7777 higher in the LHM group, but not statistically different (<i>P</i> = 0.34). The patients in the LHM group one year after the index procedure had accrued $19730.24 larger total cost, although this was not statistically different from POEM group (<i>P</i> = 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite similar clinical outcomes, the cost of the index procedure admission for POEM was significantly lower than for LHM. The difference was primarily related to shorter time increments utilized in the operating room during the index procedure, and shorter length of hospital stay following POEM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"15 10","pages":"593-601"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i10.593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has been the traditional surgical treatment for achalasia. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has demonstrated similar clinical outcomes with shorter procedure times. Studies comparing the direct cost-effectiveness of POEM vs LHM are limited.

Aim: To compare costs of POEM vs LHM.

Methods: This retrospective chart review aimed to compare the outcomes and cost of clinical care between patients who underwent POEM and LHM procedures for achalasia. The study was conducted at a tertiary academic center from January 2019 to December 2020. Clinical outcomes, including post-operative Eckardt scores and adverse events, were assessed and compared between the two groups. Direct cost variance analysis was utilized to evaluate the cost of clinical care incurred by patients undergoing POEM in the year preceding the procedure, during the index admission, and one year post-procedure, in comparison to patients undergoing LHM.

Results: Of 30 patients were included (15 POEM and 15 LHM) in the study. Patients in the POEM group had a mean Eckardt score of 0.5 ± 0.5 post-procedure, which was no different from patients in the LHM group (0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.17) indicating comparative efficacy. However, the total costs of the admission for the procedure in the LHM group were on average $1827 more expensive than in the POEM group (P < 0.01). Total healthcare costs one year prior to index procedure were $7777 higher in the LHM group, but not statistically different (P = 0.34). The patients in the LHM group one year after the index procedure had accrued $19730.24 larger total cost, although this was not statistically different from POEM group (P = 0.68).

Conclusion: Despite similar clinical outcomes, the cost of the index procedure admission for POEM was significantly lower than for LHM. The difference was primarily related to shorter time increments utilized in the operating room during the index procedure, and shorter length of hospital stay following POEM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经口内镜肌切开术与heller肌切开术治疗贲门失弛缓症的直接成本方差分析:三级转诊中心经验。
背景:腹腔镜Heller肌切开术(LHM)是贲门失弛缓症的传统外科治疗方法。最近,经口内镜肌切开术(POEM)显示出类似的临床结果,手术时间更短。比较POEM与LHM的直接成本效益的研究有限。目的:比较POEM与LHM的成本。方法:本回顾性图表综述旨在比较接受POEM和LHM贲门失弛缓症手术的患者的临床护理结果和成本。这项研究于2019年1月至2020年12月在一家高等教育中心进行。评估并比较两组的临床结果,包括术后Eckardt评分和不良事件。直接成本方差分析用于评估接受POEM的患者在手术前一年、指数入院期间和手术后一年与接受LHM的患者相比所产生的临床护理成本。结果:30名患者(15名POEM和15名LHM)被纳入研究。POEM组患者术后平均Eckardt评分为0.5±0.5,与LHM组患者(0.7±0.6,P=0.17)无差异,表明疗效比较。然而,LHM组的手术总费用平均比POEM组高1827美元(P<0.01)。LHM组在指数手术前一年的总医疗费用高7777美元,但没有统计学差异(P=0.34),尽管这与POEM组没有统计学差异(P=0.68)。结论:尽管临床结果相似,但POEM的指标程序入院成本显著低于LHM。这种差异主要与索引程序中手术室使用的时间增量较短以及POEM后住院时间较短有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil embolization for gastric varices: A promising alternative to traditional therapies. Feasibility and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy to diagnose parenchymal liver disease: A multi-centre retrospective cohort study. Hemorrhoidal elastic band ligation during routine colonoscopy: A comparative study between flexible video endoscopy and rigid proctoscopy. Impact of referral delays on dysphagia outcomes in a Saudi tertiary center. Chronic enteropathy associated with solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1 gene: A case report and review of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1