Driving, work, wound care and rehabilitation after carpal tunnel release: Consensus recommendations from a UK Delphi study.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-15 DOI:10.1177/17589983221113870
Lisa Newington, Ira Madan, Fiona Sandford
{"title":"Driving, work, wound care and rehabilitation after carpal tunnel release: Consensus recommendations from a UK Delphi study.","authors":"Lisa Newington, Ira Madan, Fiona Sandford","doi":"10.1177/17589983221113870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is variability in the information available for patients after carpal tunnel release (CTR). We aimed to establish (i) what advice should be provided regarding return to driving after CTR; (ii) how work activities should be categorised and defined in relation to CTR, and when patients should be recommended to return to these activities; (iii) what wound care and rehabilitation advice should be provided after CTR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed consensus recommendations from an expert panel of hand surgeons, primary care surgeons and hand therapists using an electronic Delphi process. Participants were recruited from clinical organisations using pre-defined criteria. Delphi questionnaires included open text and tick-box responses. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and summary feedback was provided after each round.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 33 panellists (21 surgeons and 12 hand therapists), of which 27 (82%) completed all rounds. Expected return to driving was agreed as 5-14 days. Expected timescales were also agreed for return to seven selected occupational activities. Post-operative advice focused on using and moving the hand, rather than specific rehabilitation. While consensus was reached for most items, there were important areas of disagreement, including divergent views on driving with sutures in situ and the need to inform car insurers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recommendations from this study expand on existing advice by including functional descriptors for occupational activities and guidance timescales generated through a formal consensus process. Areas where consensus was not reached warrant further exploration to assess whether different practices impact clinical and functional outcomes for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"27 3","pages":"71-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588429/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983221113870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: There is variability in the information available for patients after carpal tunnel release (CTR). We aimed to establish (i) what advice should be provided regarding return to driving after CTR; (ii) how work activities should be categorised and defined in relation to CTR, and when patients should be recommended to return to these activities; (iii) what wound care and rehabilitation advice should be provided after CTR.

Methods: We developed consensus recommendations from an expert panel of hand surgeons, primary care surgeons and hand therapists using an electronic Delphi process. Participants were recruited from clinical organisations using pre-defined criteria. Delphi questionnaires included open text and tick-box responses. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and summary feedback was provided after each round.

Results: There were 33 panellists (21 surgeons and 12 hand therapists), of which 27 (82%) completed all rounds. Expected return to driving was agreed as 5-14 days. Expected timescales were also agreed for return to seven selected occupational activities. Post-operative advice focused on using and moving the hand, rather than specific rehabilitation. While consensus was reached for most items, there were important areas of disagreement, including divergent views on driving with sutures in situ and the need to inform car insurers.

Conclusion: Recommendations from this study expand on existing advice by including functional descriptors for occupational activities and guidance timescales generated through a formal consensus process. Areas where consensus was not reached warrant further exploration to assess whether different practices impact clinical and functional outcomes for patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腕管释放后的驾驶、工作、伤口护理和康复:英国德尔福研究的一致建议。
引言:腕管松解术(CTR)后患者可获得的信息存在差异。我们旨在确定(i)CTR后应提供哪些关于恢复驾驶的建议;(ii)如何根据CTR对工作活动进行分类和定义,以及何时建议患者重返这些活动;(iii)CTR后应提供哪些伤口护理和康复建议。方法:我们使用电子Delphi流程,从手外科医生、初级保健外科医生和手治疗师组成的专家小组中制定了一致建议。参与者使用预先定义的标准从临床组织中招募。德尔福调查问卷包括开放文本和勾选框回答。共识被定义为≥75%的一致性,并在每轮之后提供总结反馈。结果:共有33名小组成员(21名外科医生和12名手部治疗师),其中27人(82%)完成了所有轮次。预计恢复驾驶时间为5-14天。还商定了恢复七项选定职业活动的预期时间表。术后建议的重点是使用和移动手,而不是具体的康复。虽然大多数项目都达成了共识,但也有重要的分歧领域,包括对现场缝合驾驶的不同看法,以及通知汽车保险公司的必要性。结论:本研究的建议扩展了现有的建议,包括职业活动的功能描述和通过正式协商过程产生的指导时间表。没有达成共识的领域需要进一步探索,以评估不同的实践是否会影响患者的临床和功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The role of early orthotic intervention in the management of post-traumatic elbow contractures: Study protocol for phase II double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty, with or without supervised hand rehabilitation: A quasi-experimental trial. A scoping review to map public-facing websites for non-traumatic wrist disorders with quality evaluation. The effect of preoperative interventions on postoperative outcomes following elective hand surgery: A systematic review. A survey of practice on the use of condition-specific patient reported outcome measures with patients who have distal radius fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1