Prognostic factors for persistent pain after a distal radius fracture: a systematic review.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-03 DOI:10.1177/17589983221124973
Catherine Rolls, Danielle A Van der Windt, Candy McCabe, Opeyemi O Babatunde, Elizabeth Bradshaw
{"title":"Prognostic factors for persistent pain after a distal radius fracture: a systematic review.","authors":"Catherine Rolls, Danielle A Van der Windt, Candy McCabe, Opeyemi O Babatunde, Elizabeth Bradshaw","doi":"10.1177/17589983221124973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the evidence regarding prognostic factors for persistent pain, including Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), after a distal radius fracture (DRF), a common condition after which persistent pain can develop.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Psychinfo, CINAHL, BNI, AMED and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials were searched from inception to May 2021 for prospective longitudinal prognostic factor studies investigating persistent pain in adults who had sustained a DRF. The Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework were used to assess the strength of evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A search yielded 440 studies of which 7 studies met full eligibility criteria. From five studies we found low evidence for high baseline pain or an ulnar styloid fracture as prognostic factors for persistent pain, and very low evidence for diabetes or older age. From two studies, investigating an outcome of CRPS, there was low evidence for high baseline pain, slow reaction time, dysynchiria, swelling and catastrophising as prognostic factors, and very low evidence for depression. Sex was found not to be a prognostic factor for CRPS or persistent pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The associations between prognostic factors and persistent pain following a DRF are unclear. The small number of factors investigated in more than one study, along with poor reporting and methodological limitations contributed to an assessment of low to very low strength of evidence. Further prospective studies, investigating psychosocial factors as candidate predictors of multidimensional pain outcomes are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"27 4","pages":"123-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983221124973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the evidence regarding prognostic factors for persistent pain, including Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), after a distal radius fracture (DRF), a common condition after which persistent pain can develop.

Methods: Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Psychinfo, CINAHL, BNI, AMED and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials were searched from inception to May 2021 for prospective longitudinal prognostic factor studies investigating persistent pain in adults who had sustained a DRF. The Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework were used to assess the strength of evidence.

Results: A search yielded 440 studies of which 7 studies met full eligibility criteria. From five studies we found low evidence for high baseline pain or an ulnar styloid fracture as prognostic factors for persistent pain, and very low evidence for diabetes or older age. From two studies, investigating an outcome of CRPS, there was low evidence for high baseline pain, slow reaction time, dysynchiria, swelling and catastrophising as prognostic factors, and very low evidence for depression. Sex was found not to be a prognostic factor for CRPS or persistent pain.

Conclusions: The associations between prognostic factors and persistent pain following a DRF are unclear. The small number of factors investigated in more than one study, along with poor reporting and methodological limitations contributed to an assessment of low to very low strength of evidence. Further prospective studies, investigating psychosocial factors as candidate predictors of multidimensional pain outcomes are recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桡骨远端骨折后持续疼痛的预后因素:一项系统综述。
引言:这项系统综述的目的是综合关于桡骨远端骨折(DRF)后持续疼痛的预后因素的证据,包括复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS),这是一种常见的持续疼痛的情况。方法:从一开始到2021年5月,检索Medline、Pubmed、Embase、Psychinfo、CINAHL、BNI、AMED和Cochrane临床试验注册中心,以进行前瞻性纵向预后因素研究,调查患有DRF的成年人的持续疼痛。预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具和建议、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)框架用于评估证据的强度。结果:一项搜索产生了440项研究,其中7项研究符合完全资格标准。从五项研究中,我们发现,作为持续疼痛的预后因素,基线疼痛或尺骨尺骨样骨折的证据很少,而糖尿病或老年人的证据很少。从两项研究CRPS的结果来看,很少有证据表明高基线疼痛、反应时间慢、呼吸困难、肿胀和灾难性发作是预后因素,抑郁症的证据也很少。性别被发现不是CRPS或持续疼痛的预后因素。结论:DRF后持续疼痛与预后因素之间的关系尚不清楚。在一项以上的研究中调查的因素数量很少,加上报告不力和方法上的局限性,导致对证据强度低到非常低的评估。建议进行进一步的前瞻性研究,调查心理社会因素作为多维疼痛结果的候选预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
A survey of practice on the use of condition-specific patient reported outcome measures with patients who have distal radius fractures. The effect of preoperative interventions on postoperative outcomes following elective hand surgery: A systematic review. Exploring patient perception of decision-making in carpal tunnel release surgery: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Rehabilitation of stage-one scapholunate instability (ReSOS): An online survey of UK practice. Production time and practicability of 3D-Printed wrist orthoses versus low temperature thermoplastic wrist orthoses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1