The use of telephone and video consultations in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A scoping review.

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1177/17589983231191867
Amy Maltby, Ann Underhill, Sarah Woodbridge
{"title":"The use of telephone and video consultations in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation: A scoping review.","authors":"Amy Maltby,&nbsp;Ann Underhill,&nbsp;Sarah Woodbridge","doi":"10.1177/17589983231191867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid uptake of virtual consultations (VCs) to minimise disease transmission and for this reason, research into telerehabilitation has been expanding. This review aimed to map and synthesize evidence on the use of VCs in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation, describe key characteristics, and identify gaps in the research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review investigated synchronous rehabilitation consultations performed over VC. All asynchronous, wearable or pre-recorded technology was excluded. CINAHL Complete, Medline, PEDro, Google Scholar and grey literature sources were searched. Screening and data extraction were done by a single researcher. Frequency counts were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies were identified, with patients with shoulder injury/pain most frequently studied. Most sources (n = 9) used bespoke video programmes. Range of motion (ROM) was the most common assessment (n = 10) and exercise prescription (n = 7) was the most common treatment. Benefits included time and cost savings, maintaining therapeutic relationships and increasing patient independence. Most diagnostic assessments, except joint and nerve tension tests, were found to be reliable and valid. Studies noted increased function in activities, decreased pain and increased ROM after VCs. Limitations included restricted 'hands-on' treatment, resource and training concerns and limiting patient factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review mapped available evidence and identified several gaps in the literature. Further robust research into VCs for hand/wrist disorders, ROM assessment and cost-effectiveness is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"28 3","pages":"89-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10581535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983231191867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid uptake of virtual consultations (VCs) to minimise disease transmission and for this reason, research into telerehabilitation has been expanding. This review aimed to map and synthesize evidence on the use of VCs in upper limb musculoskeletal rehabilitation, describe key characteristics, and identify gaps in the research.

Methods: This scoping review investigated synchronous rehabilitation consultations performed over VC. All asynchronous, wearable or pre-recorded technology was excluded. CINAHL Complete, Medline, PEDro, Google Scholar and grey literature sources were searched. Screening and data extraction were done by a single researcher. Frequency counts were used to analyse the data.

Results: Nineteen studies were identified, with patients with shoulder injury/pain most frequently studied. Most sources (n = 9) used bespoke video programmes. Range of motion (ROM) was the most common assessment (n = 10) and exercise prescription (n = 7) was the most common treatment. Benefits included time and cost savings, maintaining therapeutic relationships and increasing patient independence. Most diagnostic assessments, except joint and nerve tension tests, were found to be reliable and valid. Studies noted increased function in activities, decreased pain and increased ROM after VCs. Limitations included restricted 'hands-on' treatment, resource and training concerns and limiting patient factors.

Conclusions: This review mapped available evidence and identified several gaps in the literature. Further robust research into VCs for hand/wrist disorders, ROM assessment and cost-effectiveness is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电话和视频咨询在上肢肌肉骨骼康复中的应用:范围界定综述。
简介:2020年,新冠肺炎大流行导致虚拟咨询(VC)的迅速普及,以最大限度地减少疾病传播,因此,远程康复的研究一直在扩大。这篇综述旨在绘制和综合VC在上肢肌肉骨骼康复中使用的证据,描述关键特征,并确定研究中的差距。方法:本范围审查调查了通过VC进行的同步康复咨询。排除了所有异步、可穿戴或预先记录的技术。检索CINAHL Complete、Medline、PEDro、Google Scholar和灰色文献来源。筛选和数据提取由一名研究人员完成。频率计数用于分析数据。结果:确定了19项研究,其中肩部损伤/疼痛患者的研究频率最高。大多数来源(n=9)使用定制的视频节目。运动范围(ROM)是最常见的评估(n=10),运动处方(n=7)是最常用的治疗方法。好处包括节省时间和成本,维持治疗关系和提高患者独立性。除关节和神经张力测试外,大多数诊断评估都是可靠和有效的。研究表明,VC后活动功能增强,疼痛减轻,ROM增加。限制因素包括限制“动手”治疗、资源和培训问题以及限制患者因素。结论:这篇综述绘制了可用的证据,并确定了文献中的几个空白。需要对手/手腕疾病的VC、ROM评估和成本效益进行进一步的有力研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
A survey of practice on the use of condition-specific patient reported outcome measures with patients who have distal radius fractures. The effect of preoperative interventions on postoperative outcomes following elective hand surgery: A systematic review. Exploring patient perception of decision-making in carpal tunnel release surgery: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Rehabilitation of stage-one scapholunate instability (ReSOS): An online survey of UK practice. Production time and practicability of 3D-Printed wrist orthoses versus low temperature thermoplastic wrist orthoses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1