A novel comorbidity index in Italy based on diseases detected by the surveillance system PASSI and the Global Burden of Diseases disability weights.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Population Health Metrics Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1186/s12963-023-00317-7
Angela Andreella, Lorenzo Monasta, Stefano Campostrini
{"title":"A novel comorbidity index in Italy based on diseases detected by the surveillance system PASSI and the Global Burden of Diseases disability weights.","authors":"Angela Andreella,&nbsp;Lorenzo Monasta,&nbsp;Stefano Campostrini","doi":"10.1186/s12963-023-00317-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding comorbidity and its burden characteristics is essential for policymakers and healthcare providers to allocate resources accordingly. However, several definitions of comorbidity burden can be found in the literature. The main reason for these differences lies in the available information about the analyzed diseases (i.e., the target population studied), how to define the burden of diseases, and how to aggregate the occurrence of the detected health conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this manuscript, we focus on data from the Italian surveillance system PASSI, proposing an index of comorbidity burden based on the disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) project. We then analyzed the co-presence of ten non-communicable diseases, weighting their burden thanks to the GBD disability weights extracted by a multi-step procedure. The first step selects a set of GBD weights for each disease detected in PASSI using text mining. The second step utilizes an additional variable from PASSI (i.e., the perceived health variable) to associate a single disability weight for each disease detected in PASSI. Finally, the disability weights are combined to form the comorbidity burden index using three approaches common in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The comorbidity index (i.e., combined disability weights) proposed allows an exploration of the magnitude of the comorbidity burden in several Italian sub-populations characterized by different socioeconomic characteristics. Thanks to that, we noted that the level of comorbidity burden is greater in the sub-population characterized by low educational qualifications and economic difficulties than in the rich sub-population characterized by a high level of education. In addition, we found no substantial differences in terms of predictive values of comorbidity burden adopting different approaches in combining the disability weights (i.e., additive, maximum, and multiplicative approaches), making the Italian comorbidity index proposed quite robust and general.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"21 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00317-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding comorbidity and its burden characteristics is essential for policymakers and healthcare providers to allocate resources accordingly. However, several definitions of comorbidity burden can be found in the literature. The main reason for these differences lies in the available information about the analyzed diseases (i.e., the target population studied), how to define the burden of diseases, and how to aggregate the occurrence of the detected health conditions.

Methods: In this manuscript, we focus on data from the Italian surveillance system PASSI, proposing an index of comorbidity burden based on the disability weights from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) project. We then analyzed the co-presence of ten non-communicable diseases, weighting their burden thanks to the GBD disability weights extracted by a multi-step procedure. The first step selects a set of GBD weights for each disease detected in PASSI using text mining. The second step utilizes an additional variable from PASSI (i.e., the perceived health variable) to associate a single disability weight for each disease detected in PASSI. Finally, the disability weights are combined to form the comorbidity burden index using three approaches common in the literature.

Results: The comorbidity index (i.e., combined disability weights) proposed allows an exploration of the magnitude of the comorbidity burden in several Italian sub-populations characterized by different socioeconomic characteristics. Thanks to that, we noted that the level of comorbidity burden is greater in the sub-population characterized by low educational qualifications and economic difficulties than in the rich sub-population characterized by a high level of education. In addition, we found no substantial differences in terms of predictive values of comorbidity burden adopting different approaches in combining the disability weights (i.e., additive, maximum, and multiplicative approaches), making the Italian comorbidity index proposed quite robust and general.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利一项新的共病指数,基于监测系统PASSI检测到的疾病和全球疾病负担残疾权重。
背景:了解共病及其负担特征对于政策制定者和医疗保健提供者相应地分配资源至关重要。然而,在文献中可以找到几种关于共病负担的定义。这些差异的主要原因在于有关所分析疾病(即所研究的目标人群)的可用信息,如何定义疾病负担,以及如何汇总检测到的健康状况的发生情况。方法:在这份手稿中,我们重点关注意大利监测系统PASSI的数据,根据全球疾病负担(GBD)项目的残疾权重提出了一个共病负担指数。然后,我们分析了十种非传染性疾病的共同存在,并根据多步骤程序提取的GBD残疾权重对其负担进行加权。第一步使用文本挖掘为PASSI中检测到的每种疾病选择一组GBD权重。第二步利用PASSI中的附加变量(即感知健康变量)将PASSI中检测到的每种疾病的单个残疾权重关联起来。最后,使用文献中常见的三种方法,将残疾权重组合起来形成共病负担指数。结果:提出的共病指数(即综合残疾权重)可以探索以不同社会经济特征为特征的几个意大利亚人群的共病负担的程度。因此,我们注意到,以低学历和经济困难为特征的亚人群的共病负担水平高于以高教育水平为特征的富裕亚人群。此外,我们在合并残疾权重时采用不同的方法(即加法、最大值和乘法方法),在共病负担的预测值方面没有发现实质性差异,这使得提出的意大利共病指数相当稳健和通用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
期刊最新文献
A new method for estimating recent adult mortality from summary sibling histories. Investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the nutritional status of infants and toddlers: insights from China. Harmonizing measurements: establishing a common metric via shared items across instruments. Examining select sociodemographic characteristics of sub-county geographies for public health surveillance. Deriving disability weights for the Netherlands: findings from the Dutch disability weights measurement study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1