Tunneled femoral dialysis catheters and factors affecting their outcome: a single institution experience.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-29 DOI:10.1177/11297298231176315
Naveen Kumar Pokala, Matthew Mesick, Seung Kwon Kim, Pavan Kumar Kavali, Naganathan B Mani
{"title":"Tunneled femoral dialysis catheters and factors affecting their outcome: a single institution experience.","authors":"Naveen Kumar Pokala, Matthew Mesick, Seung Kwon Kim, Pavan Kumar Kavali, Naganathan B Mani","doi":"10.1177/11297298231176315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess a single-center experience with tunneled femoral dialysis catheter usage and outcomes and to identify any operator-dependent factors related to risk of premature catheter failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of the institutional radiology information system for tunneled femoral dialysis catheter placement from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Patients for whom the catheter was placed for an indication other than dialysis or who were less than 18 years of age at the time of catheter placement were excluded. Premature catheter failure rate, cause of premature failure, catheter patency (in days) and infection rate were assessed. Operator/placement characteristics, including laterality, catheter tip placement, and catheter length were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients were included in the study. This included <i>n</i> = 116 catheter placements. Thirty-four percent of patients (<i>n</i> = 40) were lost to follow-up, resulting in <i>n</i> = 61 patients and <i>n</i> = 76 catheters analyzed. Premature catheter failure rate was 48% (<i>n</i> = 36), with low flows being the foremost cause of failure (64%, <i>n</i> = 23). Average primary patency of these catheters was 82.4 days (1-328 days). About 8% of catheters (<i>n</i> = 3) were complicated by infection, resulting in an infection rate of 0.4/1000 catheter days. None of the operator-dependent factors analyzed, including catheter laterality, catheter tip placement, and catheter length, demonstrated a significant association with premature catheter failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Institutional primary access patency rates are comparable to or higher than previously published data, while infection rates are similar to or lower than those reported in the literature. None of the operator-dependent factors related to placement was shown to significantly decrease the risk of premature catheter failure. These findings suggest that while femoral dialysis catheters do not function well in the long term relative to internal jugular vein dialysis catheters, prior literature may undervalue their utility and function, particularly given that these catheters are used as a \"last resort\" for many patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"289-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231176315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess a single-center experience with tunneled femoral dialysis catheter usage and outcomes and to identify any operator-dependent factors related to risk of premature catheter failure.

Methods: Retrospective review of the institutional radiology information system for tunneled femoral dialysis catheter placement from 2010 to 2017 was performed. Patients for whom the catheter was placed for an indication other than dialysis or who were less than 18 years of age at the time of catheter placement were excluded. Premature catheter failure rate, cause of premature failure, catheter patency (in days) and infection rate were assessed. Operator/placement characteristics, including laterality, catheter tip placement, and catheter length were also assessed.

Results: A total of 101 patients were included in the study. This included n = 116 catheter placements. Thirty-four percent of patients (n = 40) were lost to follow-up, resulting in n = 61 patients and n = 76 catheters analyzed. Premature catheter failure rate was 48% (n = 36), with low flows being the foremost cause of failure (64%, n = 23). Average primary patency of these catheters was 82.4 days (1-328 days). About 8% of catheters (n = 3) were complicated by infection, resulting in an infection rate of 0.4/1000 catheter days. None of the operator-dependent factors analyzed, including catheter laterality, catheter tip placement, and catheter length, demonstrated a significant association with premature catheter failure.

Conclusions: Institutional primary access patency rates are comparable to or higher than previously published data, while infection rates are similar to or lower than those reported in the literature. None of the operator-dependent factors related to placement was shown to significantly decrease the risk of premature catheter failure. These findings suggest that while femoral dialysis catheters do not function well in the long term relative to internal jugular vein dialysis catheters, prior literature may undervalue their utility and function, particularly given that these catheters are used as a "last resort" for many patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨隧道透析导管及其影响结果的因素:单一机构经验。
背景:评估单中心对隧道式股骨透析导管使用和结果的经验,并确定与导管过早失效风险相关的任何操作员依赖性因素。方法:回顾性回顾2010年至2017年用于隧道式股骨干透析导管置入的机构放射学信息系统。放置导管用于透析以外的适应症或年龄小于18岁的患者 导管置入时年龄不包括在内。评估导管过早失效率、过早失效原因、导管通畅率(以天为单位)和感染率。还评估了操作员/放置特征,包括偏侧性、导管尖端放置和导管长度。结果:共有101名患者被纳入研究。其中包括n = 116导管放置。34%的患者(n = 40)在随访中丢失,导致n = 61名患者和n = 分析了76根导管。导管过早失效率为48%(n = 36),低流量是故障的首要原因(64%,n = 23)。这些导管的平均初次通畅率为82.4 天(1-328 天)。约8%的导管(n = 3) 感染率为0.4/1000导管日。所分析的操作员相关因素,包括导管偏侧性、导管尖端位置和导管长度,均未显示与导管过早失效有显著关联。结论:机构主要通路通畅率与先前公布的数据相当或更高,而感染率与文献中报道的相似或更低。与放置相关的操作员依赖性因素均未显示能显著降低导管过早失效的风险。这些发现表明,虽然股骨透析导管相对于颈内静脉透析导管的长期功能不佳,但先前的文献可能低估了其效用和功能,特别是考虑到这些导管是许多患者的“最后手段”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
First successful use of translocated autologous great saphenous vein to the upper arm for hemodialysis access in Vietnam: A 3-year follow-up case report. Femoral venous access: State of the art and future perspectives. Elimination of bleeding after tunnelled catheter removal by modified technique in practice. Integrated short peripheral intravenous cannulas and risk of catheter failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparison of procedural time with two different ultrasound-guided approaches for dorsalis pedis artery cannulation in adult patients: A randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1