Self-managed medication abortion trajectories: results from a prospective observational study in Argentina, Nigeria and Southeast Asia.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Pub Date : 2024-07-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201979
Elizabeth A Pleasants, Ruvani T Jayaweera, Ijeoma Egwuatu, Sybil Nmezi, Ika Ayu Kristianingrum, Ruth Zurbriggen, Belén Grosso, Chiara Bercu, Relebohile Motana, Caitlin Gerdts, Heidi Moseson
{"title":"Self-managed medication abortion trajectories: results from a prospective observational study in Argentina, Nigeria and Southeast Asia.","authors":"Elizabeth A Pleasants, Ruvani T Jayaweera, Ijeoma Egwuatu, Sybil Nmezi, Ika Ayu Kristianingrum, Ruth Zurbriggen, Belén Grosso, Chiara Bercu, Relebohile Motana, Caitlin Gerdts, Heidi Moseson","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Time is a crucial factor in abortion-seeking because options for care change with pregnancy duration, and most people prefer to access abortion care early in pregnancy. We aimed to collect data on the timing of steps in accompanied self-managed abortion-seeking experiences in legally restrictive settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, observational, cohort study we recruited callers from three abortion accompaniment groups in Argentina, Nigeria and a country in Southeast Asia. Participants completed a baseline survey before starting a self-managed medication abortion (SMA) and two follow-up surveys (approximately 1 and 3 weeks after taking medication). Primary outcomes of interest included: (1) time from abortion decision to contacting the hotline, (2) time from contacting the hotline to obtaining pills and (3) time from obtaining pills to taking the first dose. We explored relationships between participant characteristics and each of these outcomes and evaluated differences in overall abortion time using survival analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between July 31, 2019 and October 01, 2020 we enrolled 1352 eligible callers; 1148 provided data for this analysis. After deciding to have an abortion, participants took 12.2 days on average (95% CI: 11.6, 12.9) to start medications for abortion. On average, participants at later pregnancy durations progressed through the SMA process more quickly (<4 weeks: 20.9 days, 4 weeks: 11 days, 5-6 weeks: 10.1 days, 7-9 weeks, 10.4 days, 10+ weeks: 9.1 days; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, participants accessed accompaniment group support and started abortion regimens quickly and at relatively early pregnancy durations. SMA with accompaniment provided a time-efficient route for obtaining abortions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"155-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2023-201979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Time is a crucial factor in abortion-seeking because options for care change with pregnancy duration, and most people prefer to access abortion care early in pregnancy. We aimed to collect data on the timing of steps in accompanied self-managed abortion-seeking experiences in legally restrictive settings.

Methods: In this prospective, observational, cohort study we recruited callers from three abortion accompaniment groups in Argentina, Nigeria and a country in Southeast Asia. Participants completed a baseline survey before starting a self-managed medication abortion (SMA) and two follow-up surveys (approximately 1 and 3 weeks after taking medication). Primary outcomes of interest included: (1) time from abortion decision to contacting the hotline, (2) time from contacting the hotline to obtaining pills and (3) time from obtaining pills to taking the first dose. We explored relationships between participant characteristics and each of these outcomes and evaluated differences in overall abortion time using survival analyses.

Results: Between July 31, 2019 and October 01, 2020 we enrolled 1352 eligible callers; 1148 provided data for this analysis. After deciding to have an abortion, participants took 12.2 days on average (95% CI: 11.6, 12.9) to start medications for abortion. On average, participants at later pregnancy durations progressed through the SMA process more quickly (<4 weeks: 20.9 days, 4 weeks: 11 days, 5-6 weeks: 10.1 days, 7-9 weeks, 10.4 days, 10+ weeks: 9.1 days; p<0.001).

Conclusions: Overall, participants accessed accompaniment group support and started abortion regimens quickly and at relatively early pregnancy durations. SMA with accompaniment provided a time-efficient route for obtaining abortions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我管理药物流产轨迹:来自阿根廷、尼日利亚和东南亚的一项前瞻性观察性研究的结果。
目的:时间是寻求堕胎的一个关键因素,因为护理的选择会随着妊娠期的变化而变化,大多数人更喜欢在妊娠早期获得堕胎护理。我们的目的是收集有关在法律限制的环境中寻求自我管理堕胎经验的步骤时间的数据。方法:在这项前瞻性、观察性、队列研究中,我们招募了来自阿根廷、尼日利亚和东南亚一个国家的三个堕胎伴随组的来电者。参与者在开始自我管理药物流产(SMA)之前完成了一项基线调查和两项随访调查(约1和3 服用药物后数周)。感兴趣的主要结果包括:(1)从堕胎决定到联系热线的时间,(2)从联系热线到获得药丸的时间,以及(3)从获得药丸到服用第一剂的时间。我们探讨了参与者特征与每种结果之间的关系,并使用生存分析评估了总体流产时间的差异。结果:在2019年7月31日至2020年10月1日期间,我们招募了1352名符合条件的来电者;1148为该分析提供了数据。在决定堕胎后,参与者服用12.2 平均天数(95%可信区间:11.6,12.9)开始药物流产。平均而言,妊娠期较晚的参与者在SMA过程中进展更快(结论:总体而言,参与者获得了陪伴小组的支持,并在妊娠期相对较早的时候迅速开始了堕胎方案。伴随SMA为获得堕胎提供了一条时效性途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
期刊最新文献
Shifting discourses, changing interests? How the language of sexual and reproductive health has evolved in the past 50 years. "That's not how abortions happen": a qualitative study exploring how young adults navigate abortion misinformation in the post-Roe era. Attitudes towards the regulation and provision of abortion among healthcare professionals in Britain: cross-sectional survey data from the SACHA Study. Reported side effects from hormonal contraceptives among those seeking abortion care versus contraceptive services. The post-Roe potential of mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1