Cynical people desire power but rarely acquire it: Exploring the role of cynicism in leadership attainment

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1111/bjop.12685
Olga Stavrova, Daniel Ehlebracht, Dongning Ren
{"title":"Cynical people desire power but rarely acquire it: Exploring the role of cynicism in leadership attainment","authors":"Olga Stavrova,&nbsp;Daniel Ehlebracht,&nbsp;Dongning Ren","doi":"10.1111/bjop.12685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Do cynical individuals have a stronger desire for power and are they more likely to acquire power at work? The negative consequences of cynicism—for cynics themselves and the people around them—render the examination of these questions particularly important. We first examined the role of cynicism in power motives. Results showed that more cynical individuals have a greater desire for power to avoid exploitation by others (and less so to exploit others; Study 1) and score higher on dominance (but not prestige or leadership) motives (Study 2). The subsequent two studies examined the role of cynicism in power attainment at work. A study of virtual teams (Study 3) showed that more cynical individuals were less likely to emerge as group leaders, and a prospective study of ~9000 employees followed for up to 10 years (Study 4) showed that cynicism predicted a lower likelihood of attaining a leadership position in organizations. Taken together, more (vs. less) cynical individuals have a stronger power—in particular, dominance—motive but they are not more successful at power acquisition. These findings inform the literature on cynicism and power and highlight the importance of cynical worldviews for leadership attainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":"115 2","pages":"226-252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjop.12685","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do cynical individuals have a stronger desire for power and are they more likely to acquire power at work? The negative consequences of cynicism—for cynics themselves and the people around them—render the examination of these questions particularly important. We first examined the role of cynicism in power motives. Results showed that more cynical individuals have a greater desire for power to avoid exploitation by others (and less so to exploit others; Study 1) and score higher on dominance (but not prestige or leadership) motives (Study 2). The subsequent two studies examined the role of cynicism in power attainment at work. A study of virtual teams (Study 3) showed that more cynical individuals were less likely to emerge as group leaders, and a prospective study of ~9000 employees followed for up to 10 years (Study 4) showed that cynicism predicted a lower likelihood of attaining a leadership position in organizations. Taken together, more (vs. less) cynical individuals have a stronger power—in particular, dominance—motive but they are not more successful at power acquisition. These findings inform the literature on cynicism and power and highlight the importance of cynical worldviews for leadership attainment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
愤世嫉俗的人渴望权力,但很少获得权力:探索愤世嫉俗在领导成就中的作用。
愤世嫉俗的人是否对权力有更强的欲望,他们是否更有可能在工作中获得权力?玩世不恭对愤世嫉俗者自己和周围人的负面影响使对这些问题的审查变得尤为重要。我们首先考察了犬儒主义在权力动机中的作用。结果表明,愤世嫉俗的人更渴望权力,以避免被他人剥削(而剥削他人的欲望则更低;研究1),在支配(但不是声望或领导)动机上得分更高(研究2)。随后的两项研究考察了犬儒主义在工作中获得权力的作用。一项针对虚拟团队的研究(研究3)表明,愤世嫉俗的人不太可能成为团队领导者,一项针对约9000名员工的前瞻性研究跟踪了长达10年 年(研究4)表明,犬儒主义预测在组织中获得领导职位的可能性较低。总的来说,更多(而不是更少)愤世嫉俗的人有更强的权力,特别是支配动机,但他们在权力获取方面并不更成功。这些发现为有关犬儒主义和权力的文献提供了信息,并强调了犬儒主义世界观对领导才能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Bridging minds and machines: Unmasking the limits in text-based automatic personality recognition for enhanced psychology-AI synergy. Face and voice identity matching accuracy is not improved by multimodal identity information. The token undermining effect: When and why adding a small reward to a dated outcome makes it less preferred. Mapping the maze: A network analysis of social-emotional skills among children and adolescents with social-emotional difficulties. Sounds of the future and past.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1