Revascularization for Renovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-16 DOI:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000217
Vivek Bhalla, Stephen C Textor, Joshua A Beckman, Ana I Casanegra, Christopher J Cooper, Esther S H Kim, James M Luther, Sanjay Misra, Gustavo S Oderich
{"title":"Revascularization for Renovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.","authors":"Vivek Bhalla, Stephen C Textor, Joshua A Beckman, Ana I Casanegra, Christopher J Cooper, Esther S H Kim, James M Luther, Sanjay Misra, Gustavo S Oderich","doi":"10.1161/HYP.0000000000000217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renovascular disease is a major causal factor for secondary hypertension and renal ischemic disease. However, several prospective, randomized trials for atherosclerotic disease failed to demonstrate that renal revascularization is more effective than medical therapy for most patients. These results have greatly reduced the generalized diagnostic workup and use of renal revascularization. Most guidelines and review articles emphasize the limited average improvement and fail to identify those clinical populations that do benefit from revascularization. On the basis of the clinical experience of hypertension centers, specialists have continued selective revascularization, albeit without a summary statement by a major, multidisciplinary, national organization that identifies specific populations that may benefit. In this scientific statement for health care professionals and the public-at-large, we review the strengths and weaknesses of randomized trials in revascularization and highlight (1) when referral for consideration of diagnostic workup and therapy may be warranted, (2) the evidence/rationale for these selective scenarios, (3) interventional and surgical techniques for effective revascularization, and (4) areas of research with unmet need.</p>","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":"79 8","pages":"e128-e143"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renovascular disease is a major causal factor for secondary hypertension and renal ischemic disease. However, several prospective, randomized trials for atherosclerotic disease failed to demonstrate that renal revascularization is more effective than medical therapy for most patients. These results have greatly reduced the generalized diagnostic workup and use of renal revascularization. Most guidelines and review articles emphasize the limited average improvement and fail to identify those clinical populations that do benefit from revascularization. On the basis of the clinical experience of hypertension centers, specialists have continued selective revascularization, albeit without a summary statement by a major, multidisciplinary, national organization that identifies specific populations that may benefit. In this scientific statement for health care professionals and the public-at-large, we review the strengths and weaknesses of randomized trials in revascularization and highlight (1) when referral for consideration of diagnostic workup and therapy may be warranted, (2) the evidence/rationale for these selective scenarios, (3) interventional and surgical techniques for effective revascularization, and (4) areas of research with unmet need.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾血管疾病的血运重建:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
肾血管疾病是继发性高血压和肾缺血性疾病的主要病因。然而,几项针对动脉粥样硬化疾病的前瞻性随机试验未能证明,对大多数患者来说,肾血运重建比药物治疗更有效。这些结果大大减少了肾血运重建的一般诊断检查和使用。大多数指南和综述文章强调了有限的平均改善,未能确定那些从血运重建中受益的临床人群。根据高血压中心的临床经验,专家们继续进行选择性血运重建,尽管没有一个主要的、多学科的国家组织的总结声明来确定可能受益的特定人群。在这份针对卫生保健专业人员和广大公众的科学声明中,我们回顾了血运重建随机试验的优势和劣势,并强调(1)何时有必要转诊以考虑诊断检查和治疗,(2)这些选择性方案的证据/理据,(3)有效血运重建的介入和手术技术,以及(4)需求未得到满足的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
期刊最新文献
Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α Mediates Hypertension and Vascular Remodeling. End Point-Based Threshold for the Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index. Urokinase Promotes Redundantly Intratubular C3a-Formation But Not ENaC-Driven Hypertension in DOCA/Salt Kidney Injury. Renox Reloaded: How Metabolic Reprogramming by the NADPH Oxidase Nox4 Promotes Salt-Sensitive Hypertension. Trends in Salt Substitute Use Among Adults in the United States from 2003 to 2020.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1