Decision Factors for Glaucoma Suspects and Ocular Hypertensive Treatment at an Academic Center.

Elizabeth C Ciociola, Alicia Anderson, Huijun Jiang, Ian Funk, Feng-Chang Lin, Jean-Claude Mwanza, Meredith R Klifto, David Fleischman
{"title":"Decision Factors for Glaucoma Suspects and Ocular Hypertensive Treatment at an Academic Center.","authors":"Elizabeth C Ciociola, Alicia Anderson, Huijun Jiang, Ian Funk, Feng-Chang Lin, Jean-Claude Mwanza, Meredith R Klifto, David Fleischman","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>Practice guidelines assert that high-risk glaucoma suspects should be treated. Yet, there is ambiguity regarding what constitutes a high enough risk for treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine which factors contribute to the decision to treat glaucoma suspects and ocular hypertensive patients in an academic ophthalmology practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of glaucoma suspects or ocular hypertensives at an academic ophthalmology practice from 2014 to 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, intraocular pressure (IOP), optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, and visual field measurements were compared between treated and untreated patients. A multivariable logistic regression model assessed predictors of glaucoma suspected treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 388 patients included, 311 (80%) were untreated, and 77 (20%) were treated. There was no statistical difference in age, race/ethnicity, family history of glaucoma, central corneal thickness (CCT), or any visual field parameters between the two groups. Treated glaucoma suspects had higher IOP, thinner retinal nerve fiber layers (RNFL), more RNFL asymmetry, thinner ganglion cell-inner plexiform layers (GCIPL), and a higher prevalence of optic disc drusen, disc hemorrhage, ocular trauma, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (<i>p</i> < 0.05 for all). In the multivariable model, elevated IOP {odds ratio [OR] 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.30], <i>p</i> = 0.008}, yellow temporal [5.76 (1.80-18.40), <i>p</i> = 0.003] and superior [3.18 (1.01-10.0), <i>p</i> = 0.05] RNFL quadrants, and a history of optic disc drusen [8.77 (1.96-39.34), <i>p</i> = 0.005] were significant predictors of glaucoma suspect treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher IOP, RNFL thinning, and optic disc drusen were the strongest factors in the decision to treat a glaucoma suspect or ocular hypertensive patient. RNFL asymmetry, GCIPL thinning, and ocular comorbidities may also factor into treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Understanding the clinical characteristics that prompt glaucoma suspect treatment helps further define glaucoma suspect disease status and inform when treatment should be initiated.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Ciociola EC, Anderson A, Jiang H, <i>et al.</i> Decision Factors for Glaucoma Suspects and Ocular Hypertensive Treatment at an Academic Center. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(3):157-165.</p>","PeriodicalId":15419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","volume":"17 3","pages":"157-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10618603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and background: Practice guidelines assert that high-risk glaucoma suspects should be treated. Yet, there is ambiguity regarding what constitutes a high enough risk for treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine which factors contribute to the decision to treat glaucoma suspects and ocular hypertensive patients in an academic ophthalmology practice.

Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study of glaucoma suspects or ocular hypertensives at an academic ophthalmology practice from 2014 to 2020. Demographics, comorbidities, intraocular pressure (IOP), optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, and visual field measurements were compared between treated and untreated patients. A multivariable logistic regression model assessed predictors of glaucoma suspected treatment.

Results: Of the 388 patients included, 311 (80%) were untreated, and 77 (20%) were treated. There was no statistical difference in age, race/ethnicity, family history of glaucoma, central corneal thickness (CCT), or any visual field parameters between the two groups. Treated glaucoma suspects had higher IOP, thinner retinal nerve fiber layers (RNFL), more RNFL asymmetry, thinner ganglion cell-inner plexiform layers (GCIPL), and a higher prevalence of optic disc drusen, disc hemorrhage, ocular trauma, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (p < 0.05 for all). In the multivariable model, elevated IOP {odds ratio [OR] 1.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.30], p = 0.008}, yellow temporal [5.76 (1.80-18.40), p = 0.003] and superior [3.18 (1.01-10.0), p = 0.05] RNFL quadrants, and a history of optic disc drusen [8.77 (1.96-39.34), p = 0.005] were significant predictors of glaucoma suspect treatment.

Conclusion: Higher IOP, RNFL thinning, and optic disc drusen were the strongest factors in the decision to treat a glaucoma suspect or ocular hypertensive patient. RNFL asymmetry, GCIPL thinning, and ocular comorbidities may also factor into treatment decisions.

Clinical significance: Understanding the clinical characteristics that prompt glaucoma suspect treatment helps further define glaucoma suspect disease status and inform when treatment should be initiated.

How to cite this article: Ciociola EC, Anderson A, Jiang H, et al. Decision Factors for Glaucoma Suspects and Ocular Hypertensive Treatment at an Academic Center. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(3):157-165.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术中心青光眼疑似患者和眼部高血压治疗的决定因素。
目的和背景:实践指南主张高危青光眼嫌疑人应接受治疗。然而,对于什么构成足够高的治疗风险,目前还存在歧义。本研究的目的是确定在学术眼科实践中,哪些因素有助于决定治疗青光眼嫌疑人和眼高血压患者。材料和方法:2014年至2020年在一家学术眼科诊所对青光眼嫌疑人或眼高血压患者进行的回顾性队列研究。比较了接受治疗和未接受治疗的患者的人口学、合并症、眼压(IOP)、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)结果和视野测量结果。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了青光眼疑似治疗的预测因素。结果:388例患者中,311例(80%)未接受治疗,77例(20%)接受治疗。两组之间在年龄、种族/民族、青光眼家族史、中央角膜厚度(CCT)或任何视野参数方面没有统计学差异。接受治疗的青光眼患者IOP更高,视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)更薄,RNFL不对称性更强,神经节细胞内丛状层(GCIPL)更细,视盘核膜炎、椎间盘出血、眼外伤和增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)的发生率更高(所有患者均p<0.05)。在多变量模型中,眼压升高[比值比[OR]1.16[95%置信区间(CI)1.04-1.30],p=0.008]、颞叶黄色[5.76(1.80-18.40),p=0.003]和上型[3.18(1.01-10.0),p=0.005]RNFL象限,以及有视盘核膜炎病史[8.77(1.96-39.34),p=0.0005]是可疑青光眼治疗的重要预测因素。结论:较高的IOP、RNFL变薄和视盘凹陷是决定是否治疗青光眼可疑或眼高血压患者的最强因素。RNFL不对称、GCIPL变薄和眼部合并症也可能成为治疗决策的因素。临床意义:了解促使青光眼可疑治疗的临床特征有助于进一步确定青光眼可疑疾病的状态,并告知何时开始治疗。如何引用这篇文章:Ciociola EC,Anderson A,Jiang H,et al.学术中心青光眼疑似患者和眼高血压治疗的决策因素。青光眼临床杂志2023;17(3):157-165。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
A Review of Canaloplasty in the Treatment and Management of Glaucoma Effect of Sleeping Position on the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in Individuals with Glaucoma The Metabolic Shift: Unraveling the Potential of the Ketogenic Diet in Glaucoma Management Bilateral Chandler Syndrome, Nanophthalmos, and Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Complex Presentation, Challenging Diagnosis, and Pathological Insight—A Case Report Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Spacer for Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy Combined with Cataract Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1