Relative Telomere Length in Cervical Exfoliated Cells among Women with High-Risk Human Papillomavirus.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY Pathobiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1159/000534917
Rana Al-Awadhi, Materah Salem Alwehaidah, Moody AlRoomy, Kusum Kapila
{"title":"Relative Telomere Length in Cervical Exfoliated Cells among Women with High-Risk Human Papillomavirus.","authors":"Rana Al-Awadhi, Materah Salem Alwehaidah, Moody AlRoomy, Kusum Kapila","doi":"10.1159/000534917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigates and compares the relative telomere length (RTL) outcome of high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV)-infected normal, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cervical samples to HPV-free normal cervical samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used archived cervical samples and obtained cytology and histology data. HPV genotyping was conducted using Sanger sequencing, and RTL was performed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study investigated 287 cervical samples, including 100 normal and hr-HPV-negative samples from the control group, 44 normal and hr-HPV-infected samples, and 143 SIL and hr-HPV-infected samples. The RTL in hr-HPV-infected samples, including the SIL and normal sample groups, was significantly longer than that in the control group. RTL in HSIL (5.13 ± 3.22) and LSIL (2.86 ± 2.81) was significantly different (p &lt; 0.001). The RTL of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1) lesion (3.53 ± 2.53) differed significantly (p &lt; 0.001) when compared to CIN2 and CIN3 lesions combined (12.04 ± 10.51). The risk of developing cervical cancer was associated with RTL and decreased with RTL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed the strong potential of the RTL test in identifying women at risk of developing cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19805,"journal":{"name":"Pathobiology","volume":" ","pages":"180-186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534917","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates and compares the relative telomere length (RTL) outcome of high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV)-infected normal, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cervical samples to HPV-free normal cervical samples.

Methods: This study used archived cervical samples and obtained cytology and histology data. HPV genotyping was conducted using Sanger sequencing, and RTL was performed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Results: This study investigated 287 cervical samples, including 100 normal and hr-HPV-negative samples from the control group, 44 normal and hr-HPV-infected samples, and 143 SIL and hr-HPV-infected samples. The RTL in hr-HPV-infected samples, including the SIL and normal sample groups, was significantly longer than that in the control group. RTL in HSIL (5.13 ± 3.22) and LSIL (2.86 ± 2.81) was significantly different (p < 0.001). The RTL of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1) lesion (3.53 ± 2.53) differed significantly (p < 0.001) when compared to CIN2 and CIN3 lesions combined (12.04 ± 10.51). The risk of developing cervical cancer was associated with RTL and decreased with RTL.

Conclusion: This study revealed the strong potential of the RTL test in identifying women at risk of developing cervical cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高危型人乳头瘤病毒患者宫颈脱落细胞中端粒的相对长度。
引言:本研究调查并比较了高危(hr)人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染的正常、低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)和高度鳞状上皮内损伤(HSIL)宫颈样本与无HPV的正常宫颈样本的相对端粒长度(RTL)结果。方法:本研究使用存档的宫颈样本,并获得细胞学和组织学数据。使用Sanger测序进行HPV基因分型,使用实时定量聚合酶链式反应进行RTL。结果:本研究调查了287份宫颈样本,包括对照组的100份正常和hr HPV阴性样本,44份正常和hr-HPV感染样本,以及143份SIL和hr-HHPV感染样本。hr HPV感染样本(包括SIL和正常样本组)的RTL明显长于对照组。HSIL(5.13±3.22)和LSIL(2.86±2.81)的RTL有显著性差异(P<0.001)。宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN1)病变的RTL(3.53±2.53)与CIN2和CIN3联合病变相比有显著性差别(P<0.01)。结论:RTL检测在识别有宫颈癌症风险的女性中具有很强的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pathobiology
Pathobiology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Pathobiology'' offers a valuable platform for the publication of high-quality original research into the mechanisms underlying human disease. Aiming to serve as a bridge between basic biomedical research and clinical medicine, the journal welcomes articles from scientific areas such as pathology, oncology, anatomy, virology, internal medicine, surgery, cell and molecular biology, and immunology. Published bimonthly, ''Pathobiology'' features original research papers and reviews on translational research. The journal offers the possibility to publish proceedings of meetings dedicated to one particular topic.
期刊最新文献
Roles of cancer histology type and HPV genotype in HPV ctDNA detection at baseline in cervical cancer: Implications for tumor burden assessment. Validation of a urine- based proteomics test to predict clinically significant prostate cancer: complementing mpMRI pathway. Nodal T-cell lymphoma transdifferentiated from mantle cell lymphoma with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Human Papilloma Virus-Related Oral Mucosal Lesions in Turkey: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Next-Generation Integrated Sequencing Identifies Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients with MYD88-Mutated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1