Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in different high-risk facility types during a period of Delta variant dominance in the Republic of Korea: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0188
Min Jei Lee, Myung-Jae Hwang, Dong Seob Kim, Seon Kyeong Park, Jihyun Choi, Ji Joo Lee, Jong Mu Kim, Young-Man Kim, Young-Joon Park, Jin Gwack, Sang-Eun Lee
{"title":"Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in different high-risk facility types during a period of Delta variant dominance in the Republic of Korea: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Min Jei Lee,&nbsp;Myung-Jae Hwang,&nbsp;Dong Seob Kim,&nbsp;Seon Kyeong Park,&nbsp;Jihyun Choi,&nbsp;Ji Joo Lee,&nbsp;Jong Mu Kim,&nbsp;Young-Man Kim,&nbsp;Young-Joon Park,&nbsp;Jin Gwack,&nbsp;Sang-Eun Lee","doi":"10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in high-risk facilities in the Republic of Korea during the period when the highly transmissible Delta variant was prevalent. Additionally, we aimed to explore any disparities in vaccine effectiveness (VE) across various types of institutions, specifically distinguishing between non-medical and medical establishments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined 8 outbreak clusters covering 243 cases and 895 contacts from 8 high-risk facilities divided into 2 groups: group A (4 non-medical institutions) and group B (4 medical institutions). These clusters were observed from July 27, 2021 to October 16, 2021 for the attack rate (AR) and VE with respect to disease severity. A generalized linear model with a binomial distribution was used to determine the odds ratio (OR) for disease severity and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AR was notably lower in group B (medical institutions). Furthermore, VE analysis revealed that group A exhibited higher effectivity for disease severity and death than group B. The OR for disease severity was 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-2.16) for group A and 0.27 (95% CI, 0.12-0.64) for group B, with the OR for death at 0.12 (95% CI, 0.01-1.32) in group A and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.14-0.87) in group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although VE may vary across institutions, our findings underscore the importance of implementing vaccinations in high-risk facilities. Customized vaccination programs, tailored response plans, and competent management personnel are essential for effectively addressing and mitigating public health challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":38949,"journal":{"name":"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24171/j.phrp.2023.0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in high-risk facilities in the Republic of Korea during the period when the highly transmissible Delta variant was prevalent. Additionally, we aimed to explore any disparities in vaccine effectiveness (VE) across various types of institutions, specifically distinguishing between non-medical and medical establishments.

Methods: We examined 8 outbreak clusters covering 243 cases and 895 contacts from 8 high-risk facilities divided into 2 groups: group A (4 non-medical institutions) and group B (4 medical institutions). These clusters were observed from July 27, 2021 to October 16, 2021 for the attack rate (AR) and VE with respect to disease severity. A generalized linear model with a binomial distribution was used to determine the odds ratio (OR) for disease severity and death.

Results: AR was notably lower in group B (medical institutions). Furthermore, VE analysis revealed that group A exhibited higher effectivity for disease severity and death than group B. The OR for disease severity was 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-2.16) for group A and 0.27 (95% CI, 0.12-0.64) for group B, with the OR for death at 0.12 (95% CI, 0.01-1.32) in group A and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.14-0.87) in group B.

Conclusion: Although VE may vary across institutions, our findings underscore the importance of implementing vaccinations in high-risk facilities. Customized vaccination programs, tailored response plans, and competent management personnel are essential for effectively addressing and mitigating public health challenges.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在大韩民国德尔塔变异株占主导地位期间,新冠肺炎疫苗在不同高风险设施类型中的有效性评估:一项横断面研究。
背景:我们评估了在高传播性德尔塔变异株流行期间,在大韩民国高风险设施中接种2019冠状病毒病疫苗的有效性。此外,我们旨在探索不同类型机构在疫苗有效性(VE)方面的任何差异,特别是区分非医疗机构和医疗机构。方法:我们对来自8个高风险机构的8个疫情集群243例和895名接触者进行了调查,分为2组:A组(4个非医疗机构)和B组(4家医疗机构)。这些集群是在2021年7月27日至2021年10月16日期间观察到的,其发病率(AR)和VE与疾病严重程度有关。使用具有二项式分布的广义线性模型来确定疾病严重程度和死亡的比值比(OR)。结果:B组(医疗机构)AR明显降低。此外,VE分析显示,A组在疾病严重程度和死亡方面比B组表现出更高的有效性。A组疾病严重程度的OR为0.24(95%置信区间[CI],0.03-2.16),B组为0.27(95%可信区间,0.12-0.64),死亡的OR在A组为0.12(95%CI,0.01-1.32),在B组为0.34(95%CI,0.14-0.87)。结论:尽管VE可能因机构而异,但我们的研究结果强调了在高危机构接种疫苗的重要性。定制的疫苗接种计划、量身定制的应对计划和称职的管理人员对于有效应对和缓解公共卫生挑战至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives
Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Associations of type and intensity of social participation with depression, self-rated health, and life satisfaction among community-dwelling older adults in the Republic of Korea: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Individual and contextual factors associated with measles infection in Malaysia: a multilevel analysis. Rural-urban differences in common mental disorders among Indonesian youth: a cross-sectional national survey. Methodology of comparative studies on the relative effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review. BCED-Net: Breast Cancer Ensemble Diagnosis Network using transfer learning and the XGBoost classifier with mammography images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1