"A Community… Sounds Like Communism": Notions of Gay Community and "Community Belonging Contradiction" Among Bulgarian Non-Heterosexual Males.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Homosexuality Pub Date : 2024-11-09 Epub Date: 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1080/00918369.2023.2275302
Shaban Darakchi
{"title":"\"A Community… Sounds Like Communism\": Notions of Gay Community and \"Community Belonging Contradiction\" Among Bulgarian Non-Heterosexual Males.","authors":"Shaban Darakchi","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2023.2275302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"gay community\" has been criticized for its inability to explain the pluralities in a specific cultural and political context. Based on in-depth interviews with 63 non-heterosexual males in Bulgaria, this study aims to revisit the theories of gay communities in a non-Western, post-communist context. The data from this study suggest that (1) the idea of a \"gay community\" is often rejected due to anti-communist notions and explicit engagement with individualism as anti-communitarianism; (2) belonging to a gay community is subjective, and initial verbal detachment from gay communities does not indicate a lack of factual belonging to such communities; (3) the concepts of \"personal communities\" and \"family of choice\" remain relatively irrelevant in the Bulgarian context; (4) the most significant factor for attachment to a gay community is the notion of \"gay culture\" and \"gay scene\"; (5) recent forms of \"sexual attachments\" have led to a certain political involvement; and (6) the \"anti-gender campaigns\" have revitalized the importance of gay communities and have brought an increasing number of respondents to certain involvement in gay communities and networks, challenging the theories of \"post-gay\" societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2023.2275302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term "gay community" has been criticized for its inability to explain the pluralities in a specific cultural and political context. Based on in-depth interviews with 63 non-heterosexual males in Bulgaria, this study aims to revisit the theories of gay communities in a non-Western, post-communist context. The data from this study suggest that (1) the idea of a "gay community" is often rejected due to anti-communist notions and explicit engagement with individualism as anti-communitarianism; (2) belonging to a gay community is subjective, and initial verbal detachment from gay communities does not indicate a lack of factual belonging to such communities; (3) the concepts of "personal communities" and "family of choice" remain relatively irrelevant in the Bulgarian context; (4) the most significant factor for attachment to a gay community is the notion of "gay culture" and "gay scene"; (5) recent forms of "sexual attachments" have led to a certain political involvement; and (6) the "anti-gender campaigns" have revitalized the importance of gay communities and have brought an increasing number of respondents to certain involvement in gay communities and networks, challenging the theories of "post-gay" societies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一个社区…听起来像共产主义”:保加利亚非异性恋男性的同性恋社区和“社区归属矛盾”概念。
“同性恋群体”一词因无法在特定的文化和政治背景下解释多元性而受到批评。本研究基于对保加利亚63名非异性恋男性的深入采访,旨在重新审视非西方后共产主义背景下的同性恋群体理论。这项研究的数据表明:(1)“同性恋社区”的想法经常被拒绝,因为反共观念和作为反社群主义的个人主义的明确参与;(2) 属于同性恋群体是主观的,最初对同性恋群体的言语脱离并不意味着缺乏对此类群体的事实归属;(3) “个人社区”和“选择的家庭”的概念在保加利亚的背景下仍然相对不相关;(4) 对同性恋群体依恋的最重要因素是“同性恋文化”和“同性恋场景”的概念;(5) 最近形式的“性依恋”导致了某种政治介入;(6)“反性别运动”重振了同性恋社区的重要性,并使越来越多的受访者参与到同性恋社区和网络中,挑战了“后同性恋”社会的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
期刊最新文献
"It is for God to judge"1: Understanding Why and When Islamic Religiosity Inhibits Homotolerance. "A Community… Sounds Like Communism": Notions of Gay Community and "Community Belonging Contradiction" Among Bulgarian Non-Heterosexual Males. Developing and Validating Thai Sexual Orientation Microaggression and Microaffirmation Scales. No Cock Needed: Exploring the Hapto-Erotic Assemblage of Fist-Play in Gay Men's Anal Fisting. The Impact of Contact Experience on the Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Same-Sex Parents and Their Children Among Kindergarten Teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1