CT-based five-segment classification in Freiberg's infarction: Evaluation of its intraobserver and interobserver reliability

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2023.10.008
Yi Ren , Yu Chen , Ting-Jiang Gan , Hui Zhang , Xi Liu
{"title":"CT-based five-segment classification in Freiberg's infarction: Evaluation of its intraobserver and interobserver reliability","authors":"Yi Ren ,&nbsp;Yu Chen ,&nbsp;Ting-Jiang Gan ,&nbsp;Hui Zhang ,&nbsp;Xi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2023.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>According to the location and frequency of osteonecrosis zone of metatarsal head, a map of osteonecrosis zone was drawn for Freiberg’s infarction. The objective of the current study is to develop a new computed tomography-based Five-Segment classification system for Freiberg's infarction and testify if it has good intra- and interobserver reliability or not.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>According to the location and its frequency of osteonecrosis zone of metatarsal head, a map of osteonecrosis zone was drawn. According to the distribution of osteonecrosis zones of metatarsal heads, we proposed the Five-Segment classification system. Four evaluators evaluated each radiography and computed tomography (CT) twice at 8-week intervals. To test the reproducibility of the Five-Segment classification system, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this classification system comparing with that of the Smillie classification by four observers using the </span>kappa statistic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 80 cases were classified into five reproducible types by using Five-Segment classification system: type Ⅰ, two (2.5%) cases; type Ⅱ, ten (12.5%) cases; type Ⅲ, 42 (52.5) cases; type Ⅳ, 24 (30.0%) cases; type Ⅴ, two (2.5%) cases. The mean kappa value for interobserver reliability using Smillie classification systems was 0.562 (95% CI: 0.531–0.585), whereas the mean kappa value was 0.828 (95% CI: 0.801–0.852), by using Five-Segment classification; the mean kappa values for intraobserver reliability by using Smillie classification and Five-Segment classification were 0.777 (95% CI: 0.762–0.792) and 0.860 (95% CI: 0.843–0.895), respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The new Five-Segment classification system demonstrated perfect interobserver and intraobserver agreement between evaluators in the management of Freiberg’s infarction. Prospective studies should be done to evaluate its prognostic value and utility in clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level IV, retrospective</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1268773123001960","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

According to the location and frequency of osteonecrosis zone of metatarsal head, a map of osteonecrosis zone was drawn for Freiberg’s infarction. The objective of the current study is to develop a new computed tomography-based Five-Segment classification system for Freiberg's infarction and testify if it has good intra- and interobserver reliability or not.

Methods

According to the location and its frequency of osteonecrosis zone of metatarsal head, a map of osteonecrosis zone was drawn. According to the distribution of osteonecrosis zones of metatarsal heads, we proposed the Five-Segment classification system. Four evaluators evaluated each radiography and computed tomography (CT) twice at 8-week intervals. To test the reproducibility of the Five-Segment classification system, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this classification system comparing with that of the Smillie classification by four observers using the kappa statistic.

Results

The 80 cases were classified into five reproducible types by using Five-Segment classification system: type Ⅰ, two (2.5%) cases; type Ⅱ, ten (12.5%) cases; type Ⅲ, 42 (52.5) cases; type Ⅳ, 24 (30.0%) cases; type Ⅴ, two (2.5%) cases. The mean kappa value for interobserver reliability using Smillie classification systems was 0.562 (95% CI: 0.531–0.585), whereas the mean kappa value was 0.828 (95% CI: 0.801–0.852), by using Five-Segment classification; the mean kappa values for intraobserver reliability by using Smillie classification and Five-Segment classification were 0.777 (95% CI: 0.762–0.792) and 0.860 (95% CI: 0.843–0.895), respectively.

Conclusions

The new Five-Segment classification system demonstrated perfect interobserver and intraobserver agreement between evaluators in the management of Freiberg’s infarction. Prospective studies should be done to evaluate its prognostic value and utility in clinical practice.

Level of evidence

Level IV, retrospective

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Freiberg梗死基于CT的五节段分类:观察者内和观察者间可靠性评估。
背景:根据跖骨头坏死区的位置和频率,绘制了Freiberg梗死的骨坏死区图。本研究的目的是开发一种新的基于计算机断层扫描的Freiberg梗死五段分类系统,并验证其是否具有良好的观察者内部和观察者间可靠性。方法:根据跖骨头坏死区的位置和频率,绘制跖骨坏死区图。根据跖骨骨头坏死区的分布特点,提出了五段分类系统。四名评估人员每隔8周对每次放射线照相和计算机断层扫描(CT)进行两次评估。为了测试五段分类系统的再现性,由四名观察者使用kappa统计量对该分类系统与Smillie分类系统的观察者间和观察者内可靠性进行比较。结果:采用五段分类法将80例患者分为5个可重复型:Ⅰ型2例(2.5%);Ⅱ型10例(12.5%);Ⅲ型42例(52.5);Ⅳ型24例(30.0%);Ⅴ型2例(2.5%)。使用Smillie分类系统的观察者间可靠性的平均kappa值为0.562(95%可信区间:0.531-0.585),而使用五段分类的观察者之间可靠性的平均κ值为0.828(95%置信区间:0.801-0.852);使用Smillie分类和Five Segment分类的观察者内可靠性的平均kappa值分别为0.777(95%CI:0.762-0.792)和0.860(95%CI:0.843-0.895)。结论:新的五段分类系统显示,在Freiberg梗死的治疗中,评估者之间的观察者和观察者之间存在完美的一致性。应进行前瞻性研究,以评估其预后价值和在临床实践中的实用性。证据级别:四级,回顾性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
期刊最新文献
Comparative biomechanical study of different screw fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery: A finite element analysis. Younger age correlates with increased gutter impingement rates after total ankle arthroplasty. The clinical outcome comparison between trans-syndesmotic fixation and anatomic deltoid ligament repair in unstable ankle fractures with medial clear space widening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Use of computer-assisted hexapod external fixators for complex foot and ankle reconstructions - An analysis of functional outcomes and complications. Large language models and common patient concerns on hallux valgus: Comment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1