Barriers to Health Information Exchange Among Ambulatory Physicians: Results From a Nationally Representative Sample.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000404
Elizabeth B Matthews, Victoria Stanhope, Yuanyuan Hu
{"title":"Barriers to Health Information Exchange Among Ambulatory Physicians: Results From a Nationally Representative Sample.","authors":"Elizabeth B Matthews, Victoria Stanhope, Yuanyuan Hu","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health information exchange (HIE) improves healthcare quality, but is underutilized by providers. This study used a nationally representative survey of ambulatory physicians to examine barriers to HIE, and identify which barriers have the greatest impact on providers' use of HIE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pooled sample of 1,292 physicians from the 2018-2019 National Electronic Health Record Survey was used. Univariate statistics described rates and patterns of eight common barriers to HIE. Multivariate logistic regression examined the relationship between each barrier and the use of HIE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to HIE were common and diverse. Negative attitudes toward HIE's ability to improve clinical quality significantly decreased HIE use (OR = .44, p < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To increase adoption of HIE, efforts should focus on addressing providers' negative attitudes toward HIE. These findings can guide targeted implementation strategies to improve HIE adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 6","pages":"352-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Health information exchange (HIE) improves healthcare quality, but is underutilized by providers. This study used a nationally representative survey of ambulatory physicians to examine barriers to HIE, and identify which barriers have the greatest impact on providers' use of HIE.

Methods: A pooled sample of 1,292 physicians from the 2018-2019 National Electronic Health Record Survey was used. Univariate statistics described rates and patterns of eight common barriers to HIE. Multivariate logistic regression examined the relationship between each barrier and the use of HIE.

Results: Barriers to HIE were common and diverse. Negative attitudes toward HIE's ability to improve clinical quality significantly decreased HIE use (OR = .44, p < .01).

Conclusions: To increase adoption of HIE, efforts should focus on addressing providers' negative attitudes toward HIE. These findings can guide targeted implementation strategies to improve HIE adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊医师之间健康信息交流的障碍:来自全国代表性样本的结果。
目的:健康信息交换(HIE)提高了医疗保健质量,但提供者没有充分利用。这项研究使用了一项具有全国代表性的流动医生调查,以检查HIE的障碍,并确定哪些障碍对提供者使用HIE的影响最大。方法:使用2018-2019年国家电子健康记录调查中1292名医生的汇总样本。单变量统计描述了HIE八种常见障碍的发生率和模式。多因素logistic回归分析了各种障碍与HIE使用之间的关系。结果:HIE的障碍是常见和多样的。对HIE改善临床质量能力的负面态度显著降低了HIE的使用(OR=0.44,p<0.01)。结论:为了增加HIE的采用,应重点解决提供者对HIE的负面态度。这些发现可以指导有针对性的实施策略,以提高HIE的采用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
期刊最新文献
Continuous Quality Improvement in Social Needs Screening: Evaluation of an Intervention in Bariatric Specialty Care. Electronic Clinical Quality Measures for Prosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis: Pitfalls and Potential. Using Broken Windows Theory to Examine Flow Disruptions in Surgical Care: A Multispecialty Comparison. Optimizing Workplace Violence Reporting in a Multisite Hospital Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Preoperative Optimization of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Single Institution Cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1