Brain Injury Outcomes after Adjuvant Erythropoietin Neuroprotection for Moderate or Severe Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Report from the HEAL Trial.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Developmental Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1159/000534618
Jessica L Wisnowski, Sarah E Monsell, Stefan Bluml, Amy M Goodman, Yi Li, Bryan A Comstock, Patrick J Heagerty, Sandra E Juul, Yvonne W Wu, Robert C McKinstry, Amit M Mathur
{"title":"Brain Injury Outcomes after Adjuvant Erythropoietin Neuroprotection for Moderate or Severe Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Report from the HEAL Trial.","authors":"Jessica L Wisnowski, Sarah E Monsell, Stefan Bluml, Amy M Goodman, Yi Li, Bryan A Comstock, Patrick J Heagerty, Sandra E Juul, Yvonne W Wu, Robert C McKinstry, Amit M Mathur","doi":"10.1159/000534618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erythropoietin (Epo) is a putative neuroprotective therapy that did not improve overall outcomes in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial for neonates with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). However, HIE is a heterogeneous disorder, and it remains to be determined whether Epo had beneficial effects on a subset of perinatal brain injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a secondary analysis of neuroimaging data from the High-dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) Trial, which was conducted from 2016 to 2021 at 17 sites involving 23 US academic medical centers. Participants were neonates &gt;36 weeks' gestation undergoing therapeutic hypothermia for moderate or severe HIE who received 5 doses of study drug (Epoetin alpha 1,000 U/kg/dose) or placebo in the first week of life. Treatment assignment was stratified by trial site and severity of encephalopathy. The primary outcome was the locus, pattern, and acuity of brain injury as determined by three independent readers using a validated HIE Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 500 infants enrolled in HEAL, 470 (94%) had high quality MRI data obtained at a median of 4.9 days of age (IQR: 4.5-5.8). The incidence of injury to the deep gray nuclei, cortex, white matter, brainstem and cerebellum was similar between Epo and placebo groups. Likewise, the distribution of injury patterns was similar between groups. Among infants imaged at less than 8 days (n = 414), 94 (23%) evidenced only acute, 93 (22%) only subacute and 89 (21%) both acute and subacute injuries, with similar distribution across treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant erythropoietin did not reduce the incidence of regional brain injury. Subacute brain injury was more common than previously reported, which has key implications for the development of adjuvant neuroprotective therapies for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50585,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"285-296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Erythropoietin (Epo) is a putative neuroprotective therapy that did not improve overall outcomes in a phase 3 randomized controlled trial for neonates with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). However, HIE is a heterogeneous disorder, and it remains to be determined whether Epo had beneficial effects on a subset of perinatal brain injuries.

Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of neuroimaging data from the High-dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) Trial, which was conducted from 2016 to 2021 at 17 sites involving 23 US academic medical centers. Participants were neonates >36 weeks' gestation undergoing therapeutic hypothermia for moderate or severe HIE who received 5 doses of study drug (Epoetin alpha 1,000 U/kg/dose) or placebo in the first week of life. Treatment assignment was stratified by trial site and severity of encephalopathy. The primary outcome was the locus, pattern, and acuity of brain injury as determined by three independent readers using a validated HIE Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scoring system.

Results: Of the 500 infants enrolled in HEAL, 470 (94%) had high quality MRI data obtained at a median of 4.9 days of age (IQR: 4.5-5.8). The incidence of injury to the deep gray nuclei, cortex, white matter, brainstem and cerebellum was similar between Epo and placebo groups. Likewise, the distribution of injury patterns was similar between groups. Among infants imaged at less than 8 days (n = 414), 94 (23%) evidenced only acute, 93 (22%) only subacute and 89 (21%) both acute and subacute injuries, with similar distribution across treatment groups.

Conclusion: Adjuvant erythropoietin did not reduce the incidence of regional brain injury. Subacute brain injury was more common than previously reported, which has key implications for the development of adjuvant neuroprotective therapies for this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助促红细胞生成素神经保护治疗中度或重度新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病后的脑损伤结果:HEAL试验报告。
引言:在一项针对中度或重度缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)新生儿的3期随机对照试验中,促红细胞生成素(Epo)是一种公认的神经保护疗法,但并未改善总体结果。然而,HIE是一种异质性疾病,Epo是否对围产期脑损伤有有益影响还有待确定。方法:本研究对2016年至2021年在涉及23个美国学术医疗中心的17个地点进行的高剂量促红细胞生成素治疗窒息和脑病(HEAL)试验的神经影像学数据进行了二次分析。参与者是妊娠期>36周的新生儿,因中度或重度HIE接受治疗性低温治疗,并在出生后第一周接受5剂研究药物(Epoetinα1000 U/kg/剂)或安慰剂。根据试验地点和脑病的严重程度对治疗分配进行分层。主要结果是由三名独立读者使用经验证的HIE磁共振成像(MRI)评分系统确定的脑损伤的部位、模式和敏锐度。结果:在参加HEAL的500名婴儿中,470名(94%)在中位4.9天时获得了高质量的MRI数据(IQR 4.5-5.8)。Epo组和安慰剂组的深灰色核、皮层、白质、脑干和小脑损伤发生率相似。同样,各组之间损伤模式的分布相似。在8天内成像的婴儿中(n=414),94(23%)只出现急性损伤,93(22%)只出现亚急性损伤,89(21%)同时出现急性和亚急性损伤。各治疗组的分布相似。结论:辅助红细胞生成素不能降低局部脑损伤的发生率。亚急性脑损伤比以前报道的更常见,这对开发该人群的辅助神经保护疗法具有关键意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Neuroscience
Developmental Neuroscience 医学-发育生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Developmental Neuroscience'' is a multidisciplinary journal publishing papers covering all stages of invertebrate, vertebrate and human brain development. Emphasis is placed on publishing fundamental as well as translational studies that contribute to our understanding of mechanisms of normal development as well as genetic and environmental causes of abnormal brain development. The journal thus provides valuable information for both physicians and biologists. To meet the rapidly expanding information needs of its readers, the journal combines original papers that report on progress and advances in developmental neuroscience with concise mini-reviews that provide a timely overview of key topics, new insights and ongoing controversies. The editorial standards of ''Developmental Neuroscience'' are high. We are committed to publishing only high quality, complete papers that make significant contributions to the field.
期刊最新文献
Ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging of the human fetal brain. Pubertal- and Stress-Dependent Changes in Cellular Activation and Expression of Excitatory Amino Acid Receptor Subunits in the Paraventricular Nucleus of the Hypothalamus in Male and Female Rats. Dexmedetomidine Alleviates the Long-Term Neurodevelopmental Toxicity Induced by Sevoflurane in the Developing Brain. The Relationship between Early Exposure to General Anesthesia and Neurobehavioral Deficits. Ultrarare Variants in DNA Damage Repair Genes in Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome or Acute Behavioral Regression in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1