Colon polyps: updates in classification and management.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Current Opinion in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000988
David Dornblaser, Sigird Young, Aasma Shaukat
{"title":"Colon polyps: updates in classification and management.","authors":"David Dornblaser, Sigird Young, Aasma Shaukat","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000000988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Colon polyps are potential precursors to colorectal cancer (CRC), which remains one of the most common causes of cancer-associated death. The proper identification and management of these colorectal polyps is an important quality measure for colonoscopy outcomes. Here, we review colon polyp epidemiology, their natural history, and updates in endoscopic classification and management.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Colon polyps that form from not only the adenoma, but also the serrated polyp pathway have significant risk for future progression to CRC. Therefore, correct identification and management of sessile serrated lesions can improve the quality of screening colonoscopy. Malignant polyp recognition continues to be heavily reliant on well established endoscopic classification systems and plays an important role in intraprocedural management decisions. Hot snare remains the gold standard for pedunculated polyp resection. Nonpedunculated noninvasive lesions can be effectively removed by large forceps if diminutive, but cold snare is preferred for colon polyps 3-20 mm in diameter. Larger lesions at least 20 mm require endoscopic mucosal resection. Polyps with the endoscopic appearance of submucosal invasion require surgical referral or advanced endoscopic resection in select cases. Advances in artificial intelligence may revolutionize endoscopic polyp classification and improve both patient and cost-related outcomes of colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Clinicians should be aware of the most recent updates in colon polyp classification and management to provide the best care to their patients initiating screening colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Colon polyps are potential precursors to colorectal cancer (CRC), which remains one of the most common causes of cancer-associated death. The proper identification and management of these colorectal polyps is an important quality measure for colonoscopy outcomes. Here, we review colon polyp epidemiology, their natural history, and updates in endoscopic classification and management.

Recent findings: Colon polyps that form from not only the adenoma, but also the serrated polyp pathway have significant risk for future progression to CRC. Therefore, correct identification and management of sessile serrated lesions can improve the quality of screening colonoscopy. Malignant polyp recognition continues to be heavily reliant on well established endoscopic classification systems and plays an important role in intraprocedural management decisions. Hot snare remains the gold standard for pedunculated polyp resection. Nonpedunculated noninvasive lesions can be effectively removed by large forceps if diminutive, but cold snare is preferred for colon polyps 3-20 mm in diameter. Larger lesions at least 20 mm require endoscopic mucosal resection. Polyps with the endoscopic appearance of submucosal invasion require surgical referral or advanced endoscopic resection in select cases. Advances in artificial intelligence may revolutionize endoscopic polyp classification and improve both patient and cost-related outcomes of colonoscopy.

Summary: Clinicians should be aware of the most recent updates in colon polyp classification and management to provide the best care to their patients initiating screening colonoscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结肠息肉:分类和管理的更新。
综述目的:结肠息肉是癌症(CRC)的潜在前兆,结直肠癌仍是癌症相关死亡的最常见原因之一。正确识别和处理这些结肠息肉是结肠镜检查结果的重要质量指标。在此,我们回顾结肠息肉的流行病学、自然史以及内镜分类和管理的最新进展。最近的研究结果:结肠息肉不仅由腺瘤形成,而且由锯齿状息肉途径形成,未来发展为CRC的风险很大。因此,正确识别和处理固着锯齿状病变可以提高结肠镜筛查的质量。恶性息肉的识别仍然在很大程度上依赖于完善的内镜分类系统,并在手术过程中的管理决策中发挥着重要作用。热圈套器仍然是带蒂息肉切除术的黄金标准。如果非手术性无创病变较小,可以用大钳子有效切除,但结肠息肉首选冷圈套器3-20 直径为mm。较大病变至少20 mm需要内镜下黏膜切除术。在某些情况下,内镜下表现为粘膜下层浸润的息肉需要手术转诊或内镜下晚期切除。人工智能的进步可能会彻底改变内镜息肉分类,并改善结肠镜检查的患者和成本相关结果。摘要:临床医生应该了解结肠息肉分类和管理的最新进展,为开始筛查结肠镜检查的患者提供最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic therapies for bariatric surgery complications. Gastroduodenal injury and repair mechanisms. Nutritional aspects in patients with gastroparesis. Regurgitation, eructation, and supragastric belch: retrograde esophageal motility, disorders, and treatment. Celiac disease and nonceliac enteropathies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1