{"title":"Analysis of participation rates in Poll Everywhere questions and academic performance in a veterinary biochemistry and metabolism course.","authors":"Carie Cardamone, Christopher M Schonhoff","doi":"10.1152/advan.00127.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of the present study was to investigate whether class participation correlates with academic performance in a biochemistry and metabolism course for first-year veterinary school students. To increase engagement in this course, students had the opportunity to answer Poll Everywhere questions during many lectures in the course. These questions were mainly in multiple-choice format and delivered to students at various times (beginning, middle, and end) during the class. We compared students who earned A, B, or C grades with how often those cohorts participated in the Poll Everywhere questions. The results indicate that students who earned an A in the course have statistically significant higher participation in Poll Everywhere questions compared with students who earned a B or a C. The results do not distinguish between students who attended the lecture in person and those who watched the live stream, since remote students could answer the Poll Everywhere questions during class time. The results demonstrate an association between class participation and academic performance.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Many professional schools (medical, dental, and veterinary) routinely record most lectures and do not require attendance. Although lecture recordings may provide a valuable study tool for students, these results suggest that students who do not actively engage with class material miss an opportunity to maximize learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00127.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to investigate whether class participation correlates with academic performance in a biochemistry and metabolism course for first-year veterinary school students. To increase engagement in this course, students had the opportunity to answer Poll Everywhere questions during many lectures in the course. These questions were mainly in multiple-choice format and delivered to students at various times (beginning, middle, and end) during the class. We compared students who earned A, B, or C grades with how often those cohorts participated in the Poll Everywhere questions. The results indicate that students who earned an A in the course have statistically significant higher participation in Poll Everywhere questions compared with students who earned a B or a C. The results do not distinguish between students who attended the lecture in person and those who watched the live stream, since remote students could answer the Poll Everywhere questions during class time. The results demonstrate an association between class participation and academic performance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Many professional schools (medical, dental, and veterinary) routinely record most lectures and do not require attendance. Although lecture recordings may provide a valuable study tool for students, these results suggest that students who do not actively engage with class material miss an opportunity to maximize learning.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.