What counts as STEM, and does it matter?

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL British Journal of Educational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1111/bjep.12639
Rebecca M. Adler, Mingkai Xu, Bethany Rittle-Johnson
{"title":"What counts as STEM, and does it matter?","authors":"Rebecca M. Adler,&nbsp;Mingkai Xu,&nbsp;Bethany Rittle-Johnson","doi":"10.1111/bjep.12639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To accurately measure students' science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) career interest, researchers must get inside the ‘black box’ to understand students' conceptualizations of STEM careers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of Study 1 was to explore whether students' conceptualizations of STEM included medical careers. The aim of Study 2 was to explore whether predictors of STEM career interest (e.g., gender and motivation) varied by STEM definition (inclusion/exclusion of medical careers).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Samples</h3>\n \n <p>In Study 1, the sample was US college students (<i>N</i> = 125) who were mostly White (80%). In Study 2, the sample was US 10th-grade high school students (<i>N</i> = 455) who were mostly Black (79%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In Study 1, students completed an online questionnaire. In Study 2, students completed various measures of math achievement, motivation (science and math expectancies of success, interest and importance value) and career interest with an importance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In Study 1, medical careers were less often classified as STEM careers than traditional STEM careers, but more often classified as STEM than non-STEM careers. In Study 2, science importance value was the only motivational predictor of students' STEM+Medicine career interest, and no motivation constructs predicted traditional STEM career interest. Boys expressed greater interest in traditional STEM careers, while girls expressed greater interest in STEM+Medicine careers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Students' conceptualizations of STEM are not binary. Thus, we recommend researchers are explicit about their definition of STEM with study participants, in their coding and in their publications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51367,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":"94 1","pages":"165-180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjep.12639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To accurately measure students' science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) career interest, researchers must get inside the ‘black box’ to understand students' conceptualizations of STEM careers.

Aims

The aim of Study 1 was to explore whether students' conceptualizations of STEM included medical careers. The aim of Study 2 was to explore whether predictors of STEM career interest (e.g., gender and motivation) varied by STEM definition (inclusion/exclusion of medical careers).

Samples

In Study 1, the sample was US college students (N = 125) who were mostly White (80%). In Study 2, the sample was US 10th-grade high school students (N = 455) who were mostly Black (79%).

Methods

In Study 1, students completed an online questionnaire. In Study 2, students completed various measures of math achievement, motivation (science and math expectancies of success, interest and importance value) and career interest with an importance.

Results

In Study 1, medical careers were less often classified as STEM careers than traditional STEM careers, but more often classified as STEM than non-STEM careers. In Study 2, science importance value was the only motivational predictor of students' STEM+Medicine career interest, and no motivation constructs predicted traditional STEM career interest. Boys expressed greater interest in traditional STEM careers, while girls expressed greater interest in STEM+Medicine careers.

Conclusions

Students' conceptualizations of STEM are not binary. Thus, we recommend researchers are explicit about their definition of STEM with study participants, in their coding and in their publications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么算STEM,它重要吗?
背景:为了准确衡量学生的科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)职业兴趣,研究人员必须进入“黑匣子”,了解学生对STEM职业的概念。目的:研究1的目的是探索学生对STEM的概念化是否包括医学职业。研究2的目的是探讨STEM职业兴趣(如性别和动机)的预测因素是否因STEM定义(包括/排除医疗职业)而异。样本:在研究1中,样本为美国大学生(N = 125名),他们大多是白人(80%)。在研究2中,样本为美国10年级高中生(N = 455),其中大多数是黑人(79%)。方法:在研究1中,学生完成了一份在线问卷。在研究2中,学生完成了数学成绩、动机(科学和数学对成功的预期、兴趣和重要性值)以及具有重要性的职业兴趣的各种测量。结果:在研究1中,与传统的STEM职业相比,医学职业不太常被归类为STEM职业,但与非STEM职业相比较,医学职业更常被归类于STEM职业。在研究2中,科学重要性值是学生STEM+医学职业兴趣的唯一动机预测因子,而没有动机结构预测传统的STEM职业兴趣。男孩对传统STEM职业表现出更大的兴趣,而女孩对STEM+医学职业表现出更多的兴趣。结论:学生对STEM的概念不是二元的。因此,我们建议研究人员在研究参与者、编码和出版物中明确他们对STEM的定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Educational Psychology publishes original psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels including: - cognition - learning - motivation - literacy - numeracy and language - behaviour - social-emotional development - developmental difficulties linked to educational psychology or the psychology of education
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Academic language use in middle school informational writing. Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts. Study longer or study effectively? Better study strategies can compensate for less study time and predict goal achievement and lower negative affect. Parents' use of sustained shared thinking during joint mathematics activities with young children: An investigation of its measurement, antecedents, and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1