Comparison of Self-Efficacy and Problem-Solving Skills Between Women with Asthma and Healthy Controls: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 0.6 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Thoracic research and practice Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.23032
Melissa Köprülüoğlu, İlknur Naz, Büşra Aktaş, Berna Kömürcüoğlu, Derya Özer Kaya
{"title":"Comparison of Self-Efficacy and Problem-Solving Skills Between Women with Asthma and Healthy Controls: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Melissa Köprülüoğlu, İlknur Naz, Büşra Aktaş, Berna Kömürcüoğlu, Derya Özer Kaya","doi":"10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.23032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Problem-solving skills and self-efficacy are among the topics that are frequently investigated in people with various chronic conditions. However, there are limited studies on asthma patients. Our study aims to compare self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in asthma patients and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We included 23 women with asthma [age: 39 (34-56) years] and 23 healthy controls [age: 42 (30-55) years] in the study. Participants' sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics, Asthma Control Test, and the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale scores were recorded. We examined problem-solving skills with the Problem-Solving Inventory and self-efficacy with General Self-Efficacy Scale. We compared groups with the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Independent Sample t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, body mass index, educational status, marital status, and occupational status were similar among the groups (P > .05). However, smoking was significantly higher in healthy controls (P < .05). It was found that women with asthma had worse self-efficacy and problem-solving skills compared to healthy controls (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results showed that there may be problems in socio-cognitive skills associated with the disease. Our study focused on the possibility that female asthma patients may have low levels of self-efficacy and problem-solving skills. Therefore, health professionals designing the rehabilitation program should take these skills into account while conducting the assessment as they may be useful in developing an efficient rehabilitation program.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":"24 6","pages":"304-308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10724732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.23032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Problem-solving skills and self-efficacy are among the topics that are frequently investigated in people with various chronic conditions. However, there are limited studies on asthma patients. Our study aims to compare self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in asthma patients and healthy controls.

Material and methods: We included 23 women with asthma [age: 39 (34-56) years] and 23 healthy controls [age: 42 (30-55) years] in the study. Participants' sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics, Asthma Control Test, and the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale scores were recorded. We examined problem-solving skills with the Problem-Solving Inventory and self-efficacy with General Self-Efficacy Scale. We compared groups with the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Independent Sample t-test.

Results: Age, body mass index, educational status, marital status, and occupational status were similar among the groups (P > .05). However, smoking was significantly higher in healthy controls (P < .05). It was found that women with asthma had worse self-efficacy and problem-solving skills compared to healthy controls (P < .05).

Conclusion: These results showed that there may be problems in socio-cognitive skills associated with the disease. Our study focused on the possibility that female asthma patients may have low levels of self-efficacy and problem-solving skills. Therefore, health professionals designing the rehabilitation program should take these skills into account while conducting the assessment as they may be useful in developing an efficient rehabilitation program.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哮喘妇女与健康对照者自我效能和问题解决能力的比较:一项横断面研究。
目的:问题解决技能和自我效能感是各种慢性病患者经常调查的主题之一。然而,对哮喘患者的研究有限。我们的研究旨在比较哮喘患者和健康对照组的自我效能感和解决问题的技能。材料和方法:我们将23名哮喘女性[年龄:39(34-56)岁]和23名健康对照[年龄:42(30-55)岁]纳入研究。记录参与者的社会人口统计学和疾病相关特征、哮喘控制测试和改良医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表评分。我们用问题解决量表检验了问题解决技能,用一般自我效能量表检验自我效能。我们用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和独立样本t检验对各组进行了比较。结果:各组的年龄、体重指数、教育状况、婚姻状况和职业状况相似(P>0.05),吸烟在健康对照组中显著升高(P<0.05)。研究发现,与健康对照组相比,哮喘女性的自我效能和解决问题的能力较差(P<.05)。结论:这些结果表明,哮喘可能存在社会认知技能方面的问题。我们的研究重点是女性哮喘患者的自我效能感和解决问题的能力可能较低。因此,设计康复计划的卫生专业人员在进行评估时应考虑到这些技能,因为它们可能有助于制定有效的康复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Analysis of Tuberculosis Disease in the Case of Tuberculosis Control Dispensary. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Lung Transplant-specific Valued Life Activities Scale. Emrelis: A New Approach in Treating MET-high Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-squamous NSCLC; A Mini Review. Air Pollution, COVID-19-related Air-quality Changes, and Premature Mortality in Türkiye (2019-2023). Household Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Asthmatic Children in Algeria: A Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1