[Los sesgos cognitivos en la comunicación provacunas. Un estudio de la página de vacunación de la COVID-19 del Gobierno de España.]

Revista espanola de salud publica Pub Date : 2023-09-22
Paloma Piqueiras-Conlledo, Ubaldo Cuesta Cambra, Victoria Cuesta Díaz
{"title":"[Los sesgos cognitivos en la comunicación provacunas. Un estudio de la página de vacunación de la COVID-19 del Gobierno de España.]","authors":"Paloma Piqueiras-Conlledo,&nbsp;Ubaldo Cuesta Cambra,&nbsp;Victoria Cuesta Díaz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Health communication aims to modify attitudes and behaviors, which is why it uses, among others, persuasive strategies and the use of cognitive biases. Both elements have been investigated in previous studies, however, no research precedents have been found that evaluate government messages from both perspectives at the same time. The objective of this research was to analyze the type of information related to the COVID-19 vaccination that was distributed on the official page of the Government of Spain, evaluating its persuasive capacity and the use of cognitive biases as tools against vaccination reluctance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The information from the official page on vaccination of COVID-19 of the Government of Spain was analysed, taking into account both its structure and the content of the information. Special attention was paid to the communication strategy developed to develop pro-vaccine messages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, the information coming from the Government was presented in a concise, clear and simple way on a well-structured webpage. Second, the content shared revolved around certain recurring themes such as the benefits and the vaccination process. Third, the content had a highly scientific nature and was supported by arguments to overthrow cognitive biases against vaccination. Lastly, the communication strategy was based on content that were more informative (rational) than persuasive (emotional).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowing the techniques of persuasion and the implication of cognitive biases, especially in the area of vaccination, will help guide communication strategies in Public Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94199,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de salud publica","volume":"97 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10560520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de salud publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Health communication aims to modify attitudes and behaviors, which is why it uses, among others, persuasive strategies and the use of cognitive biases. Both elements have been investigated in previous studies, however, no research precedents have been found that evaluate government messages from both perspectives at the same time. The objective of this research was to analyze the type of information related to the COVID-19 vaccination that was distributed on the official page of the Government of Spain, evaluating its persuasive capacity and the use of cognitive biases as tools against vaccination reluctance.

Methods: The information from the official page on vaccination of COVID-19 of the Government of Spain was analysed, taking into account both its structure and the content of the information. Special attention was paid to the communication strategy developed to develop pro-vaccine messages.

Results: First, the information coming from the Government was presented in a concise, clear and simple way on a well-structured webpage. Second, the content shared revolved around certain recurring themes such as the benefits and the vaccination process. Third, the content had a highly scientific nature and was supported by arguments to overthrow cognitive biases against vaccination. Lastly, the communication strategy was based on content that were more informative (rational) than persuasive (emotional).

Conclusions: Knowing the techniques of persuasion and the implication of cognitive biases, especially in the area of vaccination, will help guide communication strategies in Public Health.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[疫苗前沟通中的认知偏见。西班牙政府新冠疫苗接种页面的一项研究。]
目的:健康沟通旨在改变态度和行为,这就是为什么它使用说服策略和使用认知偏见等。这两个因素在之前的研究中都进行了调查,然而,没有发现同时从两个角度评估政府信息的研究先例。本研究的目的是分析西班牙政府官方页面上发布的与新冠肺炎疫苗接种相关的信息类型,评估其说服能力以及将认知偏见作为反对接种意愿的工具的使用情况。方法:分析西班牙政府新冠肺炎疫苗接种官方页面上的信息,考虑其结构和信息内容。会议特别注意为发展支持疫苗的信息而制定的沟通战略。结果:首先,来自政府的信息以简洁、清晰和简单的方式呈现在一个结构良好的网页上。其次,分享的内容围绕着某些反复出现的主题,如好处和疫苗接种过程。第三,该内容具有高度科学性,并得到了推翻反对疫苗接种的认知偏见的论点的支持。最后,沟通策略基于信息(理性)多于说服(情感)的内容。结论:了解说服技术和认知偏见的含义,特别是在疫苗接种领域,将有助于指导公共卫生中的沟通策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Frailty, dependence, and unwanted loneliness in elderly. A review of the health plans]. [Review about smoking in pregnancy: prevalence, sociodemographic profile, perinatal depression, psychological variables involved and treatment]. [Factors associated with the intention to donate blood in patients of a hospital in Peru]. [A multifaceted implementation strategy to enhance the uptake of evidence-based nursing recommendations in Spain: implementation project protocol]. [Outbreak of Raoultella ornithinolytica infection in patients cared at a hemodialysis center].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1