Comparison of the effects of intraoperative remifentanil and sufentanil infusion on postoperative pain management in robotic gynecological surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-30 DOI:10.17085/apm.23007
Tae-Yun Sung, Young Seok Jee, Sung-Ae Cho, Inho Huh, Seok-Jin Lee, Choon-Kyu Cho
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of intraoperative remifentanil and sufentanil infusion on postoperative pain management in robotic gynecological surgery: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Tae-Yun Sung, Young Seok Jee, Sung-Ae Cho, Inho Huh, Seok-Jin Lee, Choon-Kyu Cho","doi":"10.17085/apm.23007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remifentanil and sufentanil are potent short-acting synthetic opioid analgesics. The administration of remifentanil has been associated with the incidence of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia may be alleviated when opioids, such as morphine, are switched to sufentanil. Therefore, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare the effects of remifentanil and sufentanil on postoperative pain in patients undergoing robotic gynecological surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent elective robotic gynecological surgery between January 2016 and February 2021. The patients were classified into sufentanil (n = 159) or remifentanil (n = 359) groups according to the opioids administered continuously during anesthesia. The primary outcome assessed in this study was the postoperative pain score measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes assessed included the recovery time (from discontinuation of opioid infusion to extubation) and frequency of rescue analgesic administration in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The recovery time did not differ significantly between the two groups. The NRS score for pain (median [1Q, 3Q]) in the PACU was significantly lower in the sufentanil group than in the remifentanil group (2 [2, 3] vs. 4 [3, 7], P < 0.001). The frequency of rescue analgesic administration in the PACU was 6.3% and 35.4% in the sufentanil and remifentanil groups, respectively (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sufentanil, as an adjunct to sevoflurane anesthesia is more advantageous than remifentanil in terms of postoperative pain control during robotic gynecological surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 4","pages":"376-381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.23007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remifentanil and sufentanil are potent short-acting synthetic opioid analgesics. The administration of remifentanil has been associated with the incidence of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia may be alleviated when opioids, such as morphine, are switched to sufentanil. Therefore, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare the effects of remifentanil and sufentanil on postoperative pain in patients undergoing robotic gynecological surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent elective robotic gynecological surgery between January 2016 and February 2021. The patients were classified into sufentanil (n = 159) or remifentanil (n = 359) groups according to the opioids administered continuously during anesthesia. The primary outcome assessed in this study was the postoperative pain score measured using the numeric rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes assessed included the recovery time (from discontinuation of opioid infusion to extubation) and frequency of rescue analgesic administration in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU).

Results: The recovery time did not differ significantly between the two groups. The NRS score for pain (median [1Q, 3Q]) in the PACU was significantly lower in the sufentanil group than in the remifentanil group (2 [2, 3] vs. 4 [3, 7], P < 0.001). The frequency of rescue analgesic administration in the PACU was 6.3% and 35.4% in the sufentanil and remifentanil groups, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Sufentanil, as an adjunct to sevoflurane anesthesia is more advantageous than remifentanil in terms of postoperative pain control during robotic gynecological surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼在机器人妇科手术术后疼痛管理中的作用比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼是强效的短效合成阿片类镇痛药。瑞芬太尼的给药与阿片类药物诱导的痛觉过敏的发生率有关。当阿片类药物(如吗啡)改用舒芬太尼时,阿片类诱导的痛觉过敏可能会减轻。因此,本回顾性观察研究旨在比较瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼对机器人妇科手术患者术后疼痛的影响。方法:我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2021年2月期间接受选择性机器人妇科手术的患者的电子病历。根据麻醉期间持续给药的阿片类药物,将患者分为舒芬太尼(n=159)组或瑞芬太尼(n=359)组。本研究评估的主要结果是使用数字评定量表(NRS)测量的术后疼痛评分。评估的次要结果包括恢复时间(从停止阿片类药物输注到拔管)和麻醉后监护室(PACU)的抢救性镇痛给药频率。结果:两组的恢复时间没有显著差异。舒芬太尼组PACU的疼痛NRS评分(中位数[1Q,3Q])显著低于瑞芬太尼组(2[2,3]vs.4[3,7],P<0.001)。舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼组PACU中抢救性镇痛给药的频率分别为6.3%和35.4%(P<0.001),在机器人妇科手术的术后疼痛控制方面,七氟烷麻醉作为一种辅助麻醉比瑞芬太尼更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of characteristics of patients whose sugammadex claims were denied by the Auto Insurance Claims Review Department of Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service: a retrospective single-center review. What is your optimal target of oxygen during general anesthesia in pediatric patients? Early extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery. Effective and safe pediatric sedation. Emergence delirium: an overview with an emphasis on the use of electroencephalography in its management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1