Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Studies in Second Language Acquisition Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1017/s0272263123000141
Rosa Maria Manchón, Sophie McBride, María Dolores Mellado Martínez, Olena Vasylets
{"title":"Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance","authors":"Rosa Maria Manchón, Sophie McBride, María Dolores Mellado Martínez, Olena Vasylets","doi":"10.1017/s0272263123000141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the independent effects of working memory (WM) and the interactive effects of WM/L2 proficiency and WM/task complexity on L2 written performance. The study followed a within–between-participant factorial design, with two levels of task complexity as the within-participant variable and L2 proficiency and WM as between-participants variables. The outcome measure was L2 writing performance as measured by CAF indices. Two groups of undergraduate students from a degree in English studies were invited to complete the simple and complex version of the “Fire-Chief” task. Task complexity was operationalized in terms of reasoning demands, and tasks were counterbalanced to avoid unwanted order effects. Participants also completed the Oxford Placement Test and a working memory test (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>-back). Regarding independent effects, results show that WM did not have an effect on L2 writing performance. In contrast, L2 proficiency was the variable most connected to various dimensions of the text produced. As for interactive effects, no significant interaction between WM, proficiency, or task complexity was found. In contrast, L2 proficiency emerged as the sole significant predictor of L2 writing performance at both levels of task complexity.","PeriodicalId":22008,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Second Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263123000141","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study examined the independent effects of working memory (WM) and the interactive effects of WM/L2 proficiency and WM/task complexity on L2 written performance. The study followed a within–between-participant factorial design, with two levels of task complexity as the within-participant variable and L2 proficiency and WM as between-participants variables. The outcome measure was L2 writing performance as measured by CAF indices. Two groups of undergraduate students from a degree in English studies were invited to complete the simple and complex version of the “Fire-Chief” task. Task complexity was operationalized in terms of reasoning demands, and tasks were counterbalanced to avoid unwanted order effects. Participants also completed the Oxford Placement Test and a working memory test (n-back). Regarding independent effects, results show that WM did not have an effect on L2 writing performance. In contrast, L2 proficiency was the variable most connected to various dimensions of the text produced. As for interactive effects, no significant interaction between WM, proficiency, or task complexity was found. In contrast, L2 proficiency emerged as the sole significant predictor of L2 writing performance at both levels of task complexity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作记忆、二语熟练度和任务复杂性:对二语书面表现的独立和互动影响
本研究考察了工作记忆(WM)对二语写作成绩的独立影响,以及工作记忆/二语熟练度和工作记忆/任务复杂性对二语书写成绩的交互影响。该研究采用了参与者内部-参与者之间的析因设计,两个级别的任务复杂性作为参与者内部变量,L2熟练度和WM作为参与者之间的变量。结果是通过CAF指数来衡量二语写作成绩。两组来自英语研究学位的本科生被邀请完成“消防队长”任务的简单和复杂版本。根据推理需求对任务复杂性进行了操作,并对任务进行了平衡,以避免不必要的顺序效应。参与者还完成了牛津大学入学测试和工作记忆测试(n-back)。关于独立效应,研究结果表明,WM对二语写作成绩没有影响。相比之下,二语水平是与所产生的文本的各个维度最相关的变量。至于交互效应,在工作记忆、熟练程度或任务复杂性之间没有发现显著的交互作用。相比之下,在两个任务复杂性水平上,二语熟练程度都是二语写作表现的唯一重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Studies in Second Language Acquisition is a refereed journal of international scope devoted to the scientific discussion of acquisition or use of non-native and heritage languages. Each volume (five issues) contains research articles of either a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods nature in addition to essays on current theoretical matters. Other rubrics include shorter articles such as Replication Studies, Critical Commentaries, and Research Reports.
期刊最新文献
Bilingualism and flexibility in task switching: A close replication study Acceptance and engagement patterns of mobile-assisted language learning among non-conventional adult L2 learners: A survival analysis Coherence and Comprehensibility in Second Language Speakers’ Academic Speaking Performance The Interplay of Mindsets, Aptitude, Grit, and Language Achievement: What Role Does Gender Play? Statistical Insignificance is not wholesale transfer in L3 Acquisition: an approximate replication of Rothman (2011)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1