Isolated femoral avulsion of the popliteus tendon: a systematic review of the literature.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta orthopaedica Belgica Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.52628/89.2.11693
Steven Heylen, Patrick Demey, Zakaria Mousati
{"title":"Isolated femoral avulsion of the popliteus tendon: a systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Steven Heylen,&nbsp;Patrick Demey,&nbsp;Zakaria Mousati","doi":"10.52628/89.2.11693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The popliteus tendon is an important part of the posterolateral corner of the knee. Isolated injuries to the posterolateral corner are very rare, as most injuries occur in multiligamentous knee trauma. Purely isolated popliteus tendon injuries are even more rare. There is very little evidence for treatment of isolated popliteus tendon avulsion injuries. The aim of this systematic review is to report on all publications regarding isolated popliteus tendon avulsion injuries and hopefully provide some guidance for future treatment algorithms. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies were included if they documented isolated popliteus tendon avulsion injuries. Exclusion criteria were studies with popliteus injuries in combination with other knee ligamentous injuries and popliteus tendon injuries other than femoral avulsion injuries. Twenty-eight studies were included which mentioned in total 38 patients with isolated popliteus tendon avulsion injuries. 24 patients (63%) were treated operatively. 3 (8%) patients were diagnosed arthroscopically but did not receive any surgical treatment. 9 patients (24%) were treated conservatively. In two publications, there was no mention of treatment. We found no clear recommendations in the literature for treatment of this rare injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/89.2.11693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The popliteus tendon is an important part of the posterolateral corner of the knee. Isolated injuries to the posterolateral corner are very rare, as most injuries occur in multiligamentous knee trauma. Purely isolated popliteus tendon injuries are even more rare. There is very little evidence for treatment of isolated popliteus tendon avulsion injuries. The aim of this systematic review is to report on all publications regarding isolated popliteus tendon avulsion injuries and hopefully provide some guidance for future treatment algorithms. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Studies were included if they documented isolated popliteus tendon avulsion injuries. Exclusion criteria were studies with popliteus injuries in combination with other knee ligamentous injuries and popliteus tendon injuries other than femoral avulsion injuries. Twenty-eight studies were included which mentioned in total 38 patients with isolated popliteus tendon avulsion injuries. 24 patients (63%) were treated operatively. 3 (8%) patients were diagnosed arthroscopically but did not receive any surgical treatment. 9 patients (24%) were treated conservatively. In two publications, there was no mention of treatment. We found no clear recommendations in the literature for treatment of this rare injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腘肌腱孤立性股性撕脱伤:文献系统回顾。
腘肌腱是膝关节后外侧角的重要组成部分。后外侧角的孤立性损伤非常罕见,因为大多数损伤发生在多韧带膝关节创伤中。单纯孤立的腘肌腱损伤更为罕见。治疗孤立性腘肌腱撕脱伤的证据很少。本系统综述的目的是报告所有关于孤立性腘肌腱撕脱伤的出版物,并希望为未来的治疗算法提供一些指导。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)对文献进行了系统评价。如果研究记录了孤立的腘肌腱撕脱伤,则纳入研究。排除标准为腘韧带损伤合并其他膝韧带损伤和腘肌腱损伤(股骨头撕脱伤除外)的研究。共有38例腘肌腱撕脱伤患者参与了28项研究。手术治疗24例(63%)。3例(8%)患者经关节镜检查确诊,但未接受任何手术治疗。保守治疗9例(24%)。在两份出版物中,没有提及治疗。我们在文献中没有发现治疗这种罕见损伤的明确建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Clavicular tunnel widening after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: comparison between single and double clavicular tunnel techniques. Patients' perspective of fast-track total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Advanced osteoarthritis of the hip as reason for extensive asymmetric leg edema: a rare case report and review of the literature. Patient with knee osteoarthritis demonstrates improved knee adduction moment after knee joint distraction: a case report. Cubital tunnel release with Wide Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique in an outpatient setting is safe and effective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1