Cost-minimization analysis of escitalopram, fluoxetine, and amitriptyline in the treatment of depression.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Indian Journal of Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.4103/ijp.ijp_854_22
Harshit Hemant Salian, M V Raghav, Vikram Singh Rawat, A Divakar
{"title":"Cost-minimization analysis of escitalopram, fluoxetine, and amitriptyline in the treatment of depression.","authors":"Harshit Hemant Salian, M V Raghav, Vikram Singh Rawat, A Divakar","doi":"10.4103/ijp.ijp_854_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Escitalopram, fluoxetine, and amitriptyline are the drugs commonly used in the treatment of depression. The pharmacoeconomic evaluation of these drugs becomes relevant as they are prescribed for a long period of time, and depression causes a significant economic burden. The cost-minimization study would contribute to bringing down the annual treatment costs, leading to better medication adherence and ultimately better patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All drug prices are mentioned in Indian National Rupee (INR). All expenses are based on 2022 pricing. No cost discounting was used because all expenditures were calculated over a year. We considered hypothetical scenarios where the patient was prescribed the lowest possible dose for depression, an equivalent antidepressant dose, a defined daily dose, and the maximum acceptable therapeutic dose for depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annual average treatment costs of amitriptyline, escitalopram, and fluoxetine in patients with depression at baseline with equivalent dosing as mono-drug therapy were 2765.53, 2914.78, and 1422.72 rupees (INR), respectively. Savings were high when the patient was shifted to fluoxetine from either escitalopram or amitriptyline. The savings from switching to fluoxetine were 50.66% and 56.42% from escitalopram and amitriptyline, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of an antidepressant depends on multiple aspects, among which the cost of treatment plays a crucial role. Among the drugs compared, fluoxetine seems to offer greater value for money. The study emphasizes that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the most commonly prescribed antidepressants not only because of their favorable pharmacological profile but also because of their affordability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13490,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","volume":"55 5","pages":"293-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.ijp_854_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Escitalopram, fluoxetine, and amitriptyline are the drugs commonly used in the treatment of depression. The pharmacoeconomic evaluation of these drugs becomes relevant as they are prescribed for a long period of time, and depression causes a significant economic burden. The cost-minimization study would contribute to bringing down the annual treatment costs, leading to better medication adherence and ultimately better patient outcomes.

Materials and methods: All drug prices are mentioned in Indian National Rupee (INR). All expenses are based on 2022 pricing. No cost discounting was used because all expenditures were calculated over a year. We considered hypothetical scenarios where the patient was prescribed the lowest possible dose for depression, an equivalent antidepressant dose, a defined daily dose, and the maximum acceptable therapeutic dose for depression.

Results: Annual average treatment costs of amitriptyline, escitalopram, and fluoxetine in patients with depression at baseline with equivalent dosing as mono-drug therapy were 2765.53, 2914.78, and 1422.72 rupees (INR), respectively. Savings were high when the patient was shifted to fluoxetine from either escitalopram or amitriptyline. The savings from switching to fluoxetine were 50.66% and 56.42% from escitalopram and amitriptyline, respectively.

Conclusion: The choice of an antidepressant depends on multiple aspects, among which the cost of treatment plays a crucial role. Among the drugs compared, fluoxetine seems to offer greater value for money. The study emphasizes that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the most commonly prescribed antidepressants not only because of their favorable pharmacological profile but also because of their affordability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾西酞普兰、氟西汀和阿米替林治疗抑郁症的成本最小化分析。
引言:依西酞普兰、氟西汀和阿米替林是治疗抑郁症的常用药物。这些药物的药物经济学评估变得相关,因为它们是长期处方的,抑郁症会造成巨大的经济负担。成本最小化研究将有助于降低年度治疗成本,从而提高药物依从性,并最终改善患者预后。材料和方法:所有药品价格均以印度卢比(INR)表示。所有费用均基于2022年的定价。没有使用成本折扣,因为所有支出都是在一年内计算的。我们考虑了假设的情况,即给患者开尽可能低的抑郁症剂量、等效的抗抑郁药剂量、确定的每日剂量和最大可接受的抑郁症治疗剂量。结果:基线时,阿米替林、艾司西酞普兰和氟西汀治疗抑郁症患者的年平均治疗费用分别为2765.53、2914.78和1422.72卢比(INR)。当患者从艾司西酞普兰或阿米替林转为氟西汀时,节省的费用很高。艾司西酞普兰和阿米替林对改用氟西汀的节省分别为50.66%和56.42%。结论:抗抑郁药的选择取决于多个方面,其中治疗费用起着至关重要的作用。在比较的药物中,氟西汀似乎更物有所值。这项研究强调,选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂是最常见的抗抑郁药,不仅因为它们具有良好的药理学特性,还因为它们的可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Pharmacology accepts, in English, review articles, articles for educational forum, original research articles (full length and short communications), letter to editor, case reports and interesting fillers. Articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology will be considered. Articles of general interest (e.g. methods, therapeutics, medical education, interesting websites, new drug information and commentary on a recent topic) are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Applying quantitative and systems pharmacology to drug development and beyond: An introduction to clinical pharmacologists Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm study to evaluate the efficacy of coadministration of garlic as a hydrogen sulfide donor and tadalafil in patients with erectile dysfunction not responding to tadalafil alone – A pilot study Advancing pediatric drug development in South Asia: Current landscape and vision for the future Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis following ceftriaxone. Pharmacomicrobiomics - Another frontier of precision medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1