Caregiver involvement in applied behavior-analytic research: A scoping review and discussion

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of applied behavior analysis Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1002/jaba.1035
Jessica L. Becraft, Samantha L. Hardesty, Kissel J. Goldman, Lesley A. Shawler, Matthew L. Edelstein, Phillip Orchowitz
{"title":"Caregiver involvement in applied behavior-analytic research: A scoping review and discussion","authors":"Jessica L. Becraft,&nbsp;Samantha L. Hardesty,&nbsp;Kissel J. Goldman,&nbsp;Lesley A. Shawler,&nbsp;Matthew L. Edelstein,&nbsp;Phillip Orchowitz","doi":"10.1002/jaba.1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We conducted a scoping review to characterize the role of caregiver involvement in behavior-analytic research. We reviewed eight behavioral-learning journals from 2011–2022 for works that included children or caregivers as participants and characterized caregiver involvement as passive (implications for caregivers, input, social validity) and active (implementation, caregiver behavior, training, caregiver-collected data). The review identified 228 studies, and almost all (96.1%; <i>n</i> = 219) involved caregivers in some capacity; 94.3% (<i>n</i> = 215) had passive involvement (26.8% had only passive involvement; <i>n</i> = 61), 69.3% (<i>n =</i> 158) had active involvement (1.8% had only active involvement<i>; n</i> = 4), and 3.9% (<i>n</i> = 9) had neither passive nor active involvement. Involvement generally increased over publication years. The most common types of involvement were implications for caregivers, implementation, and input; caregiver-collected data were rare. We propose considerations when engaging caregivers in research and suggest new avenues of inquiry related to caregivers' treatment objectives and social validity, treatment implementers, and caregiver-collected data.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"57 1","pages":"55-70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.1035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a scoping review to characterize the role of caregiver involvement in behavior-analytic research. We reviewed eight behavioral-learning journals from 2011–2022 for works that included children or caregivers as participants and characterized caregiver involvement as passive (implications for caregivers, input, social validity) and active (implementation, caregiver behavior, training, caregiver-collected data). The review identified 228 studies, and almost all (96.1%; n = 219) involved caregivers in some capacity; 94.3% (n = 215) had passive involvement (26.8% had only passive involvement; n = 61), 69.3% (n = 158) had active involvement (1.8% had only active involvement; n = 4), and 3.9% (n = 9) had neither passive nor active involvement. Involvement generally increased over publication years. The most common types of involvement were implications for caregivers, implementation, and input; caregiver-collected data were rare. We propose considerations when engaging caregivers in research and suggest new avenues of inquiry related to caregivers' treatment objectives and social validity, treatment implementers, and caregiver-collected data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理人员参与应用行为分析研究:范围界定综述和讨论。
我们进行了一项范围界定审查,以描述照顾者参与行为分析研究的作用。我们回顾了2011-2022年的八本行为学习期刊,其中包括儿童或照顾者作为参与者,并将照顾者的参与描述为被动(对照顾者的影响、输入、社会有效性)和主动(实施、照顾者行为、培训、照顾者收集的数据)。该综述确定了228项研究,几乎所有研究(96.1%;n = 219)以某种身份参与照顾者;94.3%(n = 215)有被动参与(26.8%只有被动参与;n = 61)、69.3%(n = 158)有活动性受累(1.8%只有活动性受累;n = 4) 和3.9%(n = 9) 既没有被动也没有主动参与。在出版的几年里,参与度普遍增加。最常见的参与类型是对照顾者、实施和投入的影响;护理人员收集的数据很少。我们提出了让护理人员参与研究时的考虑因素,并提出了与护理人员的治疗目标和社会有效性、治疗实施者和护理人员收集的数据相关的新的调查途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of artificial-intelligence-enhanced video feedback to improve manufacturing workers' ergonomic postural behavior: A preliminary investigation A systematic replication investigating the efficiency and effectiveness of restricted- and free-operant programming Comparing methods of evaluating sensitivity to common establishing operations and bias toward challenging behavior Unmasking social functions: Outcomes from a retrospective consecutive case series of 19 applications Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1