Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (UK TACT2; CRUK/05/19): quality of life results from a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.

IF 41.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Lancet Oncology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00460-6
Galina Velikova, James P Morden, Joanne S Haviland, Charlotte Emery, Peter Barrett-Lee, Helena Earl, David Bloomfield, Adrian Murray Brunt, Peter Canney, Robert Coleman, Mark Verrill, Andrew Wardley, Gianfilippo Bertelli, Paul Ellis, Rob Stein, Judith M Bliss, David Cameron
{"title":"Accelerated versus standard epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil or capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (UK TACT2; CRUK/05/19): quality of life results from a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, randomised, controlled trial.","authors":"Galina Velikova, James P Morden, Joanne S Haviland, Charlotte Emery, Peter Barrett-Lee, Helena Earl, David Bloomfield, Adrian Murray Brunt, Peter Canney, Robert Coleman, Mark Verrill, Andrew Wardley, Gianfilippo Bertelli, Paul Ellis, Rob Stein, Judith M Bliss, David Cameron","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00460-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early breast cancer improves outcomes but its toxicity affects patients' quality of life (QOL). The UK TACT2 trial investigated whether accelerated epirubicin improves time to recurrence and if oral capecitabine is non-inferior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) for efficacy with less toxicity. Results showed no benefit for accelerated epirubicin and capecitabine was non-inferior. As part of the QOL substudy, we aimed to assess the effect of chemotherapies on psychological distress, physical symptoms, and functional domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TACT2 was a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial done in 129 UK centres. Participants were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed node-positive or high-risk node-negative invasive primary breast cancer, who had undergone complete excision, and due to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to four cycles of 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> epirubicin either every 3 weeks (standard epirubicin) or every 2 weeks with 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 2 of each cycle (accelerated epirubicin), followed by four 4-week cycles of either CMF (600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> cyclophosphamide intravenously on days 1 and 8 or 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> orally on days 1-14; 40 mg/m<sup>2</sup> methotrexate intravenously on days 1 and 8; and 600 mg/m<sup>2</sup> fluorouracil intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle) or four 3-week cycles of 2500 mg/m<sup>2</sup> capecitabine (1250 mg/m<sup>2</sup> given twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle). The randomisation schedule was computer generated in random permuted blocks, stratified by centre, number of nodes involved (none vs 1-3 vs ≥4), age (≤50 years vs >50 years), and planned endocrine treatment (yes vs no). QOL was one of the secondary outcomes and is reported here. All patients from a subset of 44 centres were invited to complete QOL questionnaires (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core module [QLQ-C30] and Quality of Life Questionnaire breast module [QLQ-BR23]) at baseline, end of standard or accelerated epirubicin, end of CMF or capecitabine, and at 12 and 24 months after randomisation. The QOL substudy prespecified two coprimary QOL outcomes assessed in the intention-to-treat population: overall QOL (reported elsewhere) and HADS total score. Prespecified secondary QOL outcomes were EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales of physical function, role function, and fatigue and EORTC QLQ-BR23 subscales of sexual function and systemic therapy side-effects. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN68068041, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00301925.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From Dec 16, 2005, to Dec 5, 2008, 4391 patients (20 [0·5%] of whom were male) were enrolled in TACT2; 1281 (85·8%) of 1493 eligible patients were included in the QOL substudy. Eight (0·6%) participants in the QOL substudy were male and 1273 (99·4%) were female. Median follow-up was 85·6 months (IQR 80·6-95·9). Analysis was performed on the complete QOL dataset (as of Sept 15, 2011) when all participants had passed the 24-month timepoint. Prerandomisation questionnaires were completed by 1172 (91·5%) patients and 1179 (92·0%) completed at least one postrandomisation questionnaire. End-of-treatment HADS depression score (p=0·0048) and HADS total change score (p=0·0093) were worse for CMF versus capecitabine. Accelerated epirubicin led to worse physical function (p=0·0065), role function (p<0·0001), fatigue (p=0·0002), and systemic side-effects (p=0·0001), but not sexual function (p=0·36), compared with standard epirubicin during treatment, but the effect did not persist. Worse physical function (p=0·0048), sexual function (p=0·0053), fatigue (p<0·0001), and systemic side-effects (p<0·0001), but not role functioning (p=0·013), were seen for CMF versus capecitabine at end of treatment; these differences persisted at 12 months and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Accelerated epirubicin was associated with worse QOL than was standard epirubicin but only during treatment. These findings will help patients and clinicians make an informed choice about accelerated chemotherapy. CMF had worse QOL effects than did capecitabine, which were persistent for 24 months. The favourable capecitabine QOL compared with CMF supports its use as an adjuvant option after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Cancer Research UK, Amgen, Pfizer, and Roche.</p>","PeriodicalId":17942,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1359-1374"},"PeriodicalIF":41.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00460-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early breast cancer improves outcomes but its toxicity affects patients' quality of life (QOL). The UK TACT2 trial investigated whether accelerated epirubicin improves time to recurrence and if oral capecitabine is non-inferior to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) for efficacy with less toxicity. Results showed no benefit for accelerated epirubicin and capecitabine was non-inferior. As part of the QOL substudy, we aimed to assess the effect of chemotherapies on psychological distress, physical symptoms, and functional domains.

Methods: TACT2 was a multicentre, phase 3, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial done in 129 UK centres. Participants were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed node-positive or high-risk node-negative invasive primary breast cancer, who had undergone complete excision, and due to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to four cycles of 100 mg/m2 epirubicin either every 3 weeks (standard epirubicin) or every 2 weeks with 6 mg pegfilgrastim on day 2 of each cycle (accelerated epirubicin), followed by four 4-week cycles of either CMF (600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide intravenously on days 1 and 8 or 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14; 40 mg/m2 methotrexate intravenously on days 1 and 8; and 600 mg/m2 fluorouracil intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle) or four 3-week cycles of 2500 mg/m2 capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 given twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle). The randomisation schedule was computer generated in random permuted blocks, stratified by centre, number of nodes involved (none vs 1-3 vs ≥4), age (≤50 years vs >50 years), and planned endocrine treatment (yes vs no). QOL was one of the secondary outcomes and is reported here. All patients from a subset of 44 centres were invited to complete QOL questionnaires (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS] and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item core module [QLQ-C30] and Quality of Life Questionnaire breast module [QLQ-BR23]) at baseline, end of standard or accelerated epirubicin, end of CMF or capecitabine, and at 12 and 24 months after randomisation. The QOL substudy prespecified two coprimary QOL outcomes assessed in the intention-to-treat population: overall QOL (reported elsewhere) and HADS total score. Prespecified secondary QOL outcomes were EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales of physical function, role function, and fatigue and EORTC QLQ-BR23 subscales of sexual function and systemic therapy side-effects. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN68068041, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00301925.

Findings: From Dec 16, 2005, to Dec 5, 2008, 4391 patients (20 [0·5%] of whom were male) were enrolled in TACT2; 1281 (85·8%) of 1493 eligible patients were included in the QOL substudy. Eight (0·6%) participants in the QOL substudy were male and 1273 (99·4%) were female. Median follow-up was 85·6 months (IQR 80·6-95·9). Analysis was performed on the complete QOL dataset (as of Sept 15, 2011) when all participants had passed the 24-month timepoint. Prerandomisation questionnaires were completed by 1172 (91·5%) patients and 1179 (92·0%) completed at least one postrandomisation questionnaire. End-of-treatment HADS depression score (p=0·0048) and HADS total change score (p=0·0093) were worse for CMF versus capecitabine. Accelerated epirubicin led to worse physical function (p=0·0065), role function (p<0·0001), fatigue (p=0·0002), and systemic side-effects (p=0·0001), but not sexual function (p=0·36), compared with standard epirubicin during treatment, but the effect did not persist. Worse physical function (p=0·0048), sexual function (p=0·0053), fatigue (p<0·0001), and systemic side-effects (p<0·0001), but not role functioning (p=0·013), were seen for CMF versus capecitabine at end of treatment; these differences persisted at 12 months and 24 months.

Interpretation: Accelerated epirubicin was associated with worse QOL than was standard epirubicin but only during treatment. These findings will help patients and clinicians make an informed choice about accelerated chemotherapy. CMF had worse QOL effects than did capecitabine, which were persistent for 24 months. The favourable capecitabine QOL compared with CMF supports its use as an adjuvant option after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Funding: Cancer Research UK, Amgen, Pfizer, and Roche.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加速对照标准表柔比星、环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤、氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨作为癌症辅助治疗(英国TACT2;CRUK/05/19):多中心、3期、开放标签、随机对照试验的生活质量结果。
背景:早期癌症患者的辅助化疗可改善预后,但其毒性影响患者的生活质量。英国TACT2试验调查了加速表柔比星是否能缩短复发时间,以及口服卡培他滨的疗效是否不亚于环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶(CMF),且毒性较小。结果显示,加速表柔比星和卡培他滨没有任何益处。作为生活质量子研究的一部分,我们旨在评估化疗对心理困扰、身体症状和功能领域的影响。方法:TACT2是一项多中心、3期、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验,在129个英国中心进行。参与者年龄在18岁或18岁以上,患有组织学确诊的淋巴结阳性或高危淋巴结阴性侵袭性原发性癌症,已完全切除,并将接受辅助化疗。患者被随机分为(1:1:1:1)四个周期,每3周(标准表柔比星)或每2周在每个周期的第2天服用6 mg培非司汀(加速表柔比素),随后是CMF的四个4周周期(在第1天和第8天静脉注射600 mg/m2环磷酰胺或在第1-14天口服100 mg/m2;在第1天和第8天经静脉注射40 mg/m2甲氨蝶呤;以及在每个周期的第1天至第8天经静脉注射600 mg/m2氟尿嘧啶)或2500 mg/m2卡培他滨的四个3周周期(1250 mg/m2,每个周期的第一天至第14天每天两次)。随机分组表由计算机随机生成,按中心、涉及的节点数(无vs 1-3 vs≥4)、年龄(≤50岁vs>50岁)和计划内分泌治疗(是vs否)分层。生活质量是次要结果之一,在此报告。邀请44个中心的所有患者在基线、标准或加速表柔比星结束时完成生活质量问卷(医院焦虑和抑郁量表[HADS]和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织[EORTC]生活质量问卷30项核心模块[QLQ-C30]和生活质量问卷乳腺模块[QLQ-BR23]),CMF或卡培他滨结束时以及随机化后12个月和24个月。生活质量子研究预先指定了意向治疗人群中评估的两个共同主要生活质量结果:总体生活质量(其他地方报道)和HADS总分。预先指定的次要生活质量结果是身体功能、角色功能和疲劳的EORTC QLQ-C30分量表和性功能和全身治疗副作用的EORTC QL Q-BR23分量表。该试验在ISRCTN,ISRCTN68068041和ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT00301925上注册。研究结果:从2005年12月16日到2008年12月5日,4391名患者(其中20名[0.5%]为男性)被纳入TACT2;1493例符合条件的患者中有1281例(85.8%)被纳入生活质量子研究。生活质量子研究的8名参与者(0.6%)为男性,1273名参与者(99.4%)为女性。中位随访时间为85.6个月(IQR 80.6-95-9)。当所有参与者都超过了24个月的时间点时,对完整的生活质量数据集(截至2011年9月15日)进行分析。1172名(91.5%)患者完成了随机前问卷,1179名(92.0%)患者至少完成了一份随机后问卷。与卡培他滨相比,CMF治疗结束时HADS抑郁评分(p=0.0048)和HADS总变化评分(p=0.0093)更差。表柔比星加速导致身体机能下降(p=0.0065),角色函数(p解释:加速表阿霉素的生活质量比标准表阿霉素差,但仅在治疗期间。这些发现将帮助患者和临床医生对加速化疗做出明智的选择。CMF的生活质量效果比持续24个月的卡培他滨差。与CMF相比,卡培他宾良好的生活质量支持其作为佐剂使用癌症三阴性患者新辅助化疗后的选择。资助:癌症研究英国,安进,辉瑞和罗氏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Oncology
Lancet Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
62.10
自引率
1.00%
发文量
913
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Oncology is a trusted international journal that addresses various topics in clinical practice, health policy, and global oncology. It covers a wide range of cancer types, including breast, endocrine system, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynaecological, haematological, head and neck, neurooncology, paediatric, thoracic, sarcoma, and skin cancers. Additionally, it includes articles on epidemiology, cancer prevention and control, supportive care, imaging, and health-care systems. The journal has an Impact Factor of 51.1, making it the leading clinical oncology research journal worldwide. It publishes different types of articles, such as Articles, Reviews, Policy Reviews, Personal Views, Clinical Pictures, Comments, Correspondence, News, and Perspectives. The Lancet Oncology also collaborates with societies, governments, NGOs, and academic centers to publish Series and Commissions that aim to drive positive changes in clinical practice and health policy in areas of global oncology that require attention.
期刊最新文献
Fertility-sparing treatment and follow-up in patients with cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, and borderline ovarian tumours: guidelines from ESGO, ESHRE, and ESGE. AACR highlights advances and threats to US cancer research. Organisations withdraw from cancer conference over tobacco link. President Biden taking Cancer Moonshot global. Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1