Optimal dose for the efficacy of asenapine in patients with schizophrenia: Real-world data.

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-05 DOI:10.1002/npr2.12389
Yoshiteru Takekita, Shuichi Hiraoka, Yasuhiro Iwama, Daisuke Matsui, Nobuatsu Aoki, Haruhiko Ogata, Toshiya Funatsuki, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Yuji Murase, Yosuke Koshikawa, Masaki Kato, Toshihiko Kinoshita
{"title":"Optimal dose for the efficacy of asenapine in patients with schizophrenia: Real-world data.","authors":"Yoshiteru Takekita, Shuichi Hiraoka, Yasuhiro Iwama, Daisuke Matsui, Nobuatsu Aoki, Haruhiko Ogata, Toshiya Funatsuki, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Yuji Murase, Yosuke Koshikawa, Masaki Kato, Toshihiko Kinoshita","doi":"10.1002/npr2.12389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A meta-analysis of short-term studies revealed no significant differences between the doses of asenapine, 10 and 20 mg/day, in the acute treatment of schizophrenia. However, it should be noted that many patients from clinical practice were excluded, and the dose-response to asenapine in a real-world setting is still unclear. Additionally, the dose-response in the maintenance phase is not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of different asenapine doses in patients with maintenance phase of schizophrenia in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted post-marketing surveillance of asenapine in clinical settings in Japan. It followed patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who received asenapine for the first time for a maximum of 52 weeks. These patients were divided into two categories based on their average daily asenapine dosage: ≤10 mg/day and >10 mg/day. Asenapine efficacy was assessed by adjusting for patient demographics using multivariate logistic regression analysis, employing the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-I) scale, which has seven categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2774 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 1689 and 1085 patients were treated with asenapine ≤10 mg/day and >10 mg/day, respectively. The CGI-I improvement rate was significantly higher in the asenapine >10 group (p = 0.012) after adjusting for patient background factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that asenapine doses >10 mg/day may be more effective than 10 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia; however, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19137,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"234-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10932759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: A meta-analysis of short-term studies revealed no significant differences between the doses of asenapine, 10 and 20 mg/day, in the acute treatment of schizophrenia. However, it should be noted that many patients from clinical practice were excluded, and the dose-response to asenapine in a real-world setting is still unclear. Additionally, the dose-response in the maintenance phase is not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of different asenapine doses in patients with maintenance phase of schizophrenia in a real-world setting.

Methods: This study conducted post-marketing surveillance of asenapine in clinical settings in Japan. It followed patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who received asenapine for the first time for a maximum of 52 weeks. These patients were divided into two categories based on their average daily asenapine dosage: ≤10 mg/day and >10 mg/day. Asenapine efficacy was assessed by adjusting for patient demographics using multivariate logistic regression analysis, employing the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-I) scale, which has seven categories.

Results: A total of 2774 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 1689 and 1085 patients were treated with asenapine ≤10 mg/day and >10 mg/day, respectively. The CGI-I improvement rate was significantly higher in the asenapine >10 group (p = 0.012) after adjusting for patient background factors.

Conclusion: These results suggest that asenapine doses >10 mg/day may be more effective than 10 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia; however, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿塞那平对精神分裂症患者疗效的最佳剂量:真实世界数据。
目的:一项短期研究的荟萃分析显示,阿塞那平10和20的剂量之间没有显著差异 mg/天,用于精神分裂症的急性治疗。然而,应该注意的是,许多临床实践中的患者被排除在外,在现实世界中对阿塞那平的剂量反应仍不清楚。此外,维持阶段的剂量反应尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估不同剂量的阿塞那平在现实世界中对精神分裂症维持期患者的疗效差异。方法:本研究在日本临床环境中对阿塞那平进行上市后监测。它跟踪了被诊断为精神分裂症的患者,这些患者首次接受阿塞那平治疗,最多52次 周。这些患者根据其平均每日阿塞那平剂量分为两类:≤10 mg/天和 >10 mg/天。通过使用多变量逻辑回归分析调整患者人口统计学,使用临床总体印象总体改善(CGI-I)量表评估阿塞那平的疗效,该量表分为七类。结果:共有2774名患者被纳入分析。其中1689例和1085例患者接受了≤10 mg/天和 >10 mg/天。阿塞那平>10组CGI-I改善率明显高于对照组(p = 0.012)。结论:这些结果表明阿塞那平的剂量>10 mg/天可能比10更有效 mg/天用于治疗精神分裂症;然而,还需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of the rs7858836 Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms of the ASTN2 Gene on Pain-Related Phenotypes in Japanese Women Who Underwent Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery. Evaluation of GABAergic and Glutamatergic Levels in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex of Patients With Bipolar Disorder: A Cross-Sectional 1H-MRS Study. Safety of Vortioxetine in Patients With Depression: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of Intracranial Hemorrhage in a Japanese Health Insurance Claims Database. Probiotic Supplementation and Executive Function in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Pharmacologic Treatment of Kleine-Levin Syndrome: A Case Report and Comprehensive Review of Therapeutic Options.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1