[Evaluation of Psychological Distress in Obstetric Patients during the Visit Ban in Hospitals in the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Prospective, Multicentre, Controlled Study].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1055/a-2180-7507
Carmen Geißler, Julian Knoerlein, Michael K Bohlmann, Andreas Brandt, Durdana Guluzade, Monika Gerber, Dirk Watermann, Olga Weiz, Gudrun König, Filiz Markfeld, Maximilian Klar, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Mirjam Kunze
{"title":"[Evaluation of Psychological Distress in Obstetric Patients during the Visit Ban in Hospitals in the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Prospective, Multicentre, Controlled Study].","authors":"Carmen Geißler, Julian Knoerlein, Michael K Bohlmann, Andreas Brandt, Durdana Guluzade, Monika Gerber, Dirk Watermann, Olga Weiz, Gudrun König, Filiz Markfeld, Maximilian Klar, Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, Mirjam Kunze","doi":"10.1055/a-2180-7507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Risk factors for postpartum depression include a lack of social support and perceived social isolation. We would like to determine whether the isolation of inpatients on the maternity wards during Covid-19 leads to increased psychological stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre, controlled study of obstetric patients who gave birth during an inpatient stay. Patients were included during the visitation ban (study group) and after the visitation ban (control group). Psychological stress was evaluated with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during the inpatient stay and six to eight weeks postpartum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 194 women were included, 107 in the study group and 87 in the control group. The overall result of the first EPDS shows a higher score in the study group compared to the control group (7.0 vs. 4.9 points). Primipara show a higher score in the first EPDS compared to multipara (7.28 vs. 4.82). Caesarean section, regardless of isolation, shows a higher score in the first EPDS than vaginal birth (8.42 vs. 5.11). Comparison of vaginal birth shows a higher score only in the study group (5.97 vs. 4.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of Covid-19, women giving birth and new mothers, especially primipara, are exposed to increased psychological stress in the clinics. Caesarean section leads to increased psychological stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2180-7507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Risk factors for postpartum depression include a lack of social support and perceived social isolation. We would like to determine whether the isolation of inpatients on the maternity wards during Covid-19 leads to increased psychological stress.

Methods: This is a multicentre, controlled study of obstetric patients who gave birth during an inpatient stay. Patients were included during the visitation ban (study group) and after the visitation ban (control group). Psychological stress was evaluated with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during the inpatient stay and six to eight weeks postpartum.

Results: A total of 194 women were included, 107 in the study group and 87 in the control group. The overall result of the first EPDS shows a higher score in the study group compared to the control group (7.0 vs. 4.9 points). Primipara show a higher score in the first EPDS compared to multipara (7.28 vs. 4.82). Caesarean section, regardless of isolation, shows a higher score in the first EPDS than vaginal birth (8.42 vs. 5.11). Comparison of vaginal birth shows a higher score only in the study group (5.97 vs. 4.07).

Conclusion: In the context of Covid-19, women giving birth and new mothers, especially primipara, are exposed to increased psychological stress in the clinics. Caesarean section leads to increased psychological stress.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
【评估严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型大流行期间医院禁止就诊期间产科患者的心理困扰:一项前瞻性、多中心、对照研究】。
引言:产后抑郁症的危险因素包括缺乏社会支持和社会孤立感。我们想确定新冠肺炎期间产科病房住院患者的隔离是否会导致心理压力增加。方法:这是一项针对住院期间分娩的产科患者的多中心对照研究。患者包括在探视禁令期间(研究组)和探视禁令之后(对照组)。采用爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)对住院期间和产后6-8周的心理压力进行评估。结果:共纳入194名女性,研究组107名,对照组87名。第一次EPDS的总体结果显示,与对照组相比,研究组的得分更高(7.0分对4.9分)。初产妇在第一次EPDS中的得分高于经产妇(7.28比4.82)。剖腹产,无论是否隔离,在第一次EP中的得分均高于阴道分娩(8.42比5.11)。阴道分娩的比较仅在研究组中显示出更高的得分(5.97比4.07)。结论:在新冠肺炎的背景下,在诊所里,他们面临着越来越大的心理压力。剖腹产会增加心理压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
期刊最新文献
Intrapericardial Teratoma and Associated 3q29 Deletion in a Fetus: Case Report. Evaluation of Ophthalmic Artery Doppler Parameters in Preeclamptic and Normotensive Pregnant Women. [Pneumonia due to Mycoplasma hominis in a Full-Term Newborn - A Case Report with Literature Review]. ["Who cares about us?" Results of a cross-sectional study on the psychosocial health of obstetricians and midwives after traumatic birth experiences]. [Legal Compliance of Medical Information in the Case of a Relatively Indicated Secondary Caesarean Section in Obstetric Clinics in Germany - Part II: New Information Concept].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1