Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.

IF 1.2 Q4 REHABILITATION South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2023-10-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923
Mercy A Agtuahene, Jonathan Quartey, Samuel Kwakye
{"title":"Influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index on hand grip strength.","authors":"Mercy A Agtuahene,&nbsp;Jonathan Quartey,&nbsp;Samuel Kwakye","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired <i>t</i>-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (<i>r</i> = 0.492; <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (<i>r</i> = 0.290; <i>p</i> < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (<i>r</i> = 0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.982).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"79 1","pages":"1923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hand grip strength (HGS) measurements serve as an objective measure of upper extremity function. Reliable hand strength evaluation is vital for assessing treatment effectiveness.

Objectives: To determine the influence of hand dominance, gender, and body mass index (BMI) on HGS among university students in Ghana.

Method: In our cross-sectional study of 304 participants, height, weight, and BMI were measured using a stadiometer and weighing scale. Hand grip strength was assessed with a dynamometer. We compared HGS in dominant and non-dominant hands for males and females using a paired t-test and analysed the correlation between grip strength and weight, height, and BMI using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Results: The mean HGS for right-hand dominant (RHD) male participants was 35.62 kg (± 7.36) for the right hand compared with 32.84 kg (± 7.36) for the left hand. For females RHD the mean HGS in the right hand was 24.60 kg (± 6.42) compared to 22.12 kg (± 5.37) in the left hand. The mean weight, height and BMI of participants were 62.86 kg (± 10.30), 1.67 m (± 0.09) and 22.9 kg/m2 (± 4.9), respectively. A significant relationship existed between HGS and height (r = 0.492; p < 0.01) as well as HGS and BMI (r = 0.290; p < 0.01). However, no notable connection was found between HGS and weight (r = 0.001; p = 0.982).

Conclusion: Hand grip strength was significantly stronger in the dominant hand of both males and females.

Clinical implications: Physiotherapists should test HGS objectively and quantitatively for use in disease evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手优势、性别和体重指数对握力的影响。
背景:握力(HGS)测量是上肢功能的客观测量。可靠的手部力量评估对于评估治疗效果至关重要。目的:确定加纳大学生的手优势、性别和体重指数(BMI)对HGS的影响。方法:在我们对304名参与者的横断面研究中,使用视距仪和体重秤测量身高、体重和BMI。用测功机评估握力。我们使用配对t检验比较了男性和女性优势手和非优势手的HGS,并使用Pearson相关系数分析了握力与体重、身高和BMI之间的相关性。结果:右手占优势(RHD)男性参与者右手的平均HGS为35.62 kg(±7.36),而左手为32.84 kg(±7.3 6)。对于女性RHD,右手的平均HGS为24.60 kg(±6.42),而左手为22.12 kg(±5.37)。参与者的平均体重、身高和BMI分别为62.86 kg(±10.30)、1.67 m(±0.09)和22.9 kg/m2(±4.9)。HGS与身高(r=0.492;p<0.01)、HGS与BMI(r=0.290;p<0.01)呈显著相关,但与体重(r=0.001;p=0.982)无显著相关性。临床意义:物理治疗师应客观、定量地测试HGS,用于疾病评估、诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of physiotherapists regarding challenges experienced by patients with Deafness in accessing rehabilitative care. First contact, last priority? Reimagining physiotherapy in primary health care. Systematic review of the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in post-coronavirus disease. Postoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: A survey in Gauteng, South Africa. Quality of life in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A cross-sectional comparison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1