Comparative dosimetric study of spot-scanning proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated radiation therapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Medical Dosimetry Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.004
Toshiyuki Ogata PhD, Norihiro Aibe MD, PhD, Takuya Kimoto MD, PhD, Tadashi Takenaka RTT, Gen Suzuki MD, PhD, Kei Yamada MD, PhD, Hideya Yamazaki MD, PhD
{"title":"Comparative dosimetric study of spot-scanning proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated radiation therapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer","authors":"Toshiyuki Ogata PhD,&nbsp;Norihiro Aibe MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takuya Kimoto MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tadashi Takenaka RTT,&nbsp;Gen Suzuki MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kei Yamada MD, PhD,&nbsp;Hideya Yamazaki MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>This study aimed to compare the dose distributions and clarify the dosimetric characteristics of spot-scanning </span>proton therapy<span><span> (SSPT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for extrahepatic </span>bile duct cancer<span> (EBDC). This retrospective study included 10 patients with EBDC treated with real-time image-gated SSPT. Using the simultaneous integrated boost technique, the 2 prescription dose levels for planning target volumes were 72.6 and 44 Gy, delivered in 22 fractions. Plan quality comparisons were conducted by analyzing various parameters, including homogeneity, conformity, dose to organs at risk, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for radiation-induced liver damage (RILD). The target dose distributions using SSPT were almost equivalent to those achieved using photon VMAT. There was a significant reduction in all liver dose parameters, the NTCP value for RILD, and kidney dose (mean, V</span></span></span><sub>12 Gy</sub>, and V<sub>18 Gy</sub>) in SSPT than in photon VMAT. No significant differences were observed in the intestinal doses in the high-dose area. Thus, compared with photon VMAT, SSPT for EBDC significantly reduced radiation doses to the liver and kidneys and has shown potential clinical benefits of reduced radiation-induced toxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":"49 1","pages":"Pages 46-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394723001000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the dose distributions and clarify the dosimetric characteristics of spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT) and photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC). This retrospective study included 10 patients with EBDC treated with real-time image-gated SSPT. Using the simultaneous integrated boost technique, the 2 prescription dose levels for planning target volumes were 72.6 and 44 Gy, delivered in 22 fractions. Plan quality comparisons were conducted by analyzing various parameters, including homogeneity, conformity, dose to organs at risk, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for radiation-induced liver damage (RILD). The target dose distributions using SSPT were almost equivalent to those achieved using photon VMAT. There was a significant reduction in all liver dose parameters, the NTCP value for RILD, and kidney dose (mean, V12 Gy, and V18 Gy) in SSPT than in photon VMAT. No significant differences were observed in the intestinal doses in the high-dose area. Thus, compared with photon VMAT, SSPT for EBDC significantly reduced radiation doses to the liver and kidneys and has shown potential clinical benefits of reduced radiation-induced toxicity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症肝外胆管斑点扫描质子治疗与容量调制放射治疗的剂量学比较研究。
本研究旨在比较斑点扫描质子疗法(SSPT)和光子体积调制电弧疗法(VMAT)治疗肝外胆管癌症(EBDC)的剂量分布,阐明其剂量特性。这项回顾性研究包括10名接受实时图像门控SSPT治疗的EBDC患者。使用同时集成增强技术,规划目标体积的2个处方剂量水平分别为72.6和44Gy,分22个部分提供。通过分析各种参数进行计划质量比较,包括辐射诱导肝损伤(RILD)的同质性、一致性、危险器官剂量和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)。使用SSPT的目标剂量分布几乎等同于使用光子VMAT实现的目标剂量分配。与光子VMAT相比,SSPT中的所有肝脏剂量参数、RILD的NTCP值和肾脏剂量(平均值V12Gy和V18Gy)均显著降低。高剂量区域的肠道剂量没有观察到显著差异。因此,与光子VMAT相比,用于EBDC的SSPT显著降低了对肝脏和肾脏的辐射剂量,并显示出降低辐射诱导毒性的潜在临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Dosimetry
Medical Dosimetry 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Clinically interpretable machine-learning model for predicting heart mean dose using simple BEV-based metrics. Dosimetric impact of density overrides on treatment planning for prostate MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Anatomy-based definition of posterior neck in head and neck VMAT plan optimization as potential new organ at risk. Directed Journal Reading (DJR) Program, Spring 2026 New Members List & Corporate Members List, Spring 2026
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1