Finding our Voice: Evaluation of Goal Setting Using the Habits of Preceptors Rubric in Terms of Focus, "SMARTness," and Impact.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000540
Maura J Wolken, Suzanne Larson, Erin C Raney, Elizabeth K Pogge, Titilola M Afolabi, Tara Storjohann, Kathleen A Fairman, Lindsay E Davis
{"title":"Finding our Voice: Evaluation of Goal Setting Using the Habits of Preceptors Rubric in Terms of Focus, \"SMARTness,\" and Impact.","authors":"Maura J Wolken, Suzanne Larson, Erin C Raney, Elizabeth K Pogge, Titilola M Afolabi, Tara Storjohann, Kathleen A Fairman, Lindsay E Davis","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective leadership propels teams from effectiveness to greatness and is accomplished when everyone achieves and contributes their full potential, or \"voice.\" The Clinician Educators Program Teaching and Learning Curriculum fosters preceptor development using the Habits of Preceptors Rubric (HOP-R) to guide participants in finding their precepting \"voice.\" After the HOP-R self-assessment, participants select a habit of focus (HOF) and craft a SMART (specific/measurable/achievable/relevant/time-bound) goal. This report describes a pilot rubric, SMART-EP (emotional intelligence(EI)/professionalism), exploring goal \"SMARTness\" alongside change (impact) in participants' perceived precepting capabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HOP-R self-ratings (2018-2020) and HOF/SMART goals (2019-2020) were retrospectively reviewed by two raters. Perceived preceptor capabilities were measured by analyzing the change in self-assessed habit level ratings between the first/fourth-quarter surveys. SMART goals were categorized by HOF and inclusion of SMART-EP components. Participants were guided in the inclusion of SMART, but not -EP, components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In aggregate, 120 participants completed HOP-R surveys (2018-2020). Within-subject changes across all 11 habits were significant ( P < .001). For the SMART-EP rubric analysis (2019-2020), 71 participants had an average \"SMARTness\" score of 3.92 (of 5) with corresponding interrater reliability of 0.91. Goals included 2.77 (of 4) EI traits and 1.72 (of 3) professionalism components.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SMART-EP rubric provided insights into preceptor development opportunities among participants. Beyond SMART components, participants often included elements of EI and professionalism. Ratings confirm and support the consistency of the HOP-R as a tool to assess precepting habits.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective leadership propels teams from effectiveness to greatness and is accomplished when everyone achieves and contributes their full potential, or "voice." The Clinician Educators Program Teaching and Learning Curriculum fosters preceptor development using the Habits of Preceptors Rubric (HOP-R) to guide participants in finding their precepting "voice." After the HOP-R self-assessment, participants select a habit of focus (HOF) and craft a SMART (specific/measurable/achievable/relevant/time-bound) goal. This report describes a pilot rubric, SMART-EP (emotional intelligence(EI)/professionalism), exploring goal "SMARTness" alongside change (impact) in participants' perceived precepting capabilities.

Methods: HOP-R self-ratings (2018-2020) and HOF/SMART goals (2019-2020) were retrospectively reviewed by two raters. Perceived preceptor capabilities were measured by analyzing the change in self-assessed habit level ratings between the first/fourth-quarter surveys. SMART goals were categorized by HOF and inclusion of SMART-EP components. Participants were guided in the inclusion of SMART, but not -EP, components.

Results: In aggregate, 120 participants completed HOP-R surveys (2018-2020). Within-subject changes across all 11 habits were significant ( P < .001). For the SMART-EP rubric analysis (2019-2020), 71 participants had an average "SMARTness" score of 3.92 (of 5) with corresponding interrater reliability of 0.91. Goals included 2.77 (of 4) EI traits and 1.72 (of 3) professionalism components.

Discussion: The SMART-EP rubric provided insights into preceptor development opportunities among participants. Beyond SMART components, participants often included elements of EI and professionalism. Ratings confirm and support the consistency of the HOP-R as a tool to assess precepting habits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找我们的声音:从专注、“聪明”和影响力的角度,使用格言习惯评估目标设定。
引言:有效的领导力推动团队从有效走向伟大,当每个人都实现并贡献出自己的全部潜力或“声音”时,才能实现有效的领导力。临床医生教育工作者计划教学课程通过使用导师习惯评估表(HOP-R)来引导参与者找到他们的导师“声音”,从而促进导师的发展。“在HOP-R自我评估后,参与者选择一种专注习惯(HOF),并制定一个SMART(具体/可衡量/可实现/相关/有时限)目标。本报告描述了一个试点准则SMART-EP(情绪智力(EI)/专业精神),探索目标“SMARTness”以及参与者感知的学习能力的变化(影响)。方法:HOP-R自评(2018-2020)HOF/SMART目标(2019-2020)由两名评分者进行了回顾性审查。通过分析第一季度/第四季度调查之间自我评估的习惯水平评分的变化来衡量感知的引导者能力。SMART目标按HOF和SMART-EP组成部分进行分类。指导参与者纳入SMART,但不包括-EP组件。结果:总共有120名参与者完成了HOP-R调查(2018-2020年)。所有11个习惯的受试者内部变化都是显著的(P<.001)。在SMART-EP量规分析(2019-2020)中,71名参与者的平均“SMARTness”得分为3.92(共5分),相应的参与者间可靠性为0.91。目标包括2.77(共4个)EI特征和1.72(共3个)专业成分。讨论:SMART-EP准则为参与者提供了关于导师发展机会的见解。除了SMART组成部分外,参与者通常还包括EI和专业精神的元素。评级确认并支持HOP-R作为评估学习习惯的工具的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgment. Applying the Purpose, Autonomy, Confidence, Engrossment Model of Motivational Design to Support Motivation for Continuing Professional Development. The Professional Agency in Supervision of General Practitioners Before Their Supervisor Training Module: A Narrative Positioning Analysis. Assessing Physician Motivation to Engage in Continuing Professional Development on Artificial Intelligence. Challenges of Contemporary Practice: Internists Maintaining Competency in Multiple Specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1