Success and Challenges of Community Bicycle Advocacy Organizations in Reaching Underserved Populations.

Lucas D Elliott, Melissa Bopp
{"title":"Success and Challenges of Community Bicycle Advocacy Organizations in Reaching Underserved Populations.","authors":"Lucas D Elliott, Melissa Bopp","doi":"10.1177/2752535X231211418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bicycling, as forms of recreation and travel, offers many positive physical and mental health benefits, though there are still many disparities in bicycling rates among underserved populations in the United States. Community bicycling advocacy organizations/coalitions promote and advocate for increased bicycling; however, have been shown to have a lack of organizational capacity for equitable programming to diverse populations (racial/ethnic minorities, women, low-income, LGBTQ+ communities, youth). The purpose of this study was to understand the current practices for providing underserved populations bicycling programming among advocacy organizations and to find major barriers and helpful tools for equitable programming.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was conducted in a volunteer sample of U.S. bicycle advocacy organizations. An interview (<i>n</i> = 23) assessed organizational function, successful programs, and barriers to reaching underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several themes emerged from the interviews. Participants stated that the lack of organizational leadership and member diversity, along with a lack of trust with underserved communities, presented major barriers to providing equitable programming. Partnering with other community organizations that place an emphasis on serving diverse populations was noted to have potential for increasing successful programming by allocating resources and connections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although barriers exist for bicycle advocacy organizations when attempting to reach underserved and diverse populations, groups should focus on creating successful and diverse partnerships to increase the capacity for providing equitable programming.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X231211418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231211418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bicycling, as forms of recreation and travel, offers many positive physical and mental health benefits, though there are still many disparities in bicycling rates among underserved populations in the United States. Community bicycling advocacy organizations/coalitions promote and advocate for increased bicycling; however, have been shown to have a lack of organizational capacity for equitable programming to diverse populations (racial/ethnic minorities, women, low-income, LGBTQ+ communities, youth). The purpose of this study was to understand the current practices for providing underserved populations bicycling programming among advocacy organizations and to find major barriers and helpful tools for equitable programming.

Methods: This was conducted in a volunteer sample of U.S. bicycle advocacy organizations. An interview (n = 23) assessed organizational function, successful programs, and barriers to reaching underserved populations.

Results: Several themes emerged from the interviews. Participants stated that the lack of organizational leadership and member diversity, along with a lack of trust with underserved communities, presented major barriers to providing equitable programming. Partnering with other community organizations that place an emphasis on serving diverse populations was noted to have potential for increasing successful programming by allocating resources and connections.

Conclusion: Although barriers exist for bicycle advocacy organizations when attempting to reach underserved and diverse populations, groups should focus on creating successful and diverse partnerships to increase the capacity for providing equitable programming.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区自行车倡导组织在服务不足人群中的成功与挑战。
引言:骑自行车作为一种娱乐和旅行形式,对身心健康有许多积极的好处,尽管在美国服务不足的人群中,骑自行车的比率仍然存在许多差异。社区骑自行车倡导组织/联盟促进和倡导增加骑自行车的次数;然而,已经证明,缺乏为不同人群(种族/族裔少数群体、妇女、低收入、LGBTQ+社区、青年)公平制定方案的组织能力。本研究的目的是了解目前在倡导组织中为服务不足的人群提供骑自行车计划的做法,并找到公平计划的主要障碍和有用工具。方法:这是在美国自行车倡导组织的志愿者样本中进行的。一项访谈(n=23)评估了组织功能、成功的项目以及接触服务不足人群的障碍。结果:采访中出现了几个主题。与会者指出,缺乏组织领导和成员多样性,以及与服务不足的社区缺乏信任,是提供公平方案的主要障碍。有人指出,与其他强调为不同人群服务的社区组织合作,有可能通过分配资源和联系来增加成功的方案编制。结论:尽管自行车倡导组织在试图接触服务不足和多样化的人群时存在障碍,但各团体应专注于建立成功和多样化的伙伴关系,以提高提供公平方案的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community Engagement in the BE SAGE Project: Reducing COVID-19 in Hispanic and Low-Income Preschoolers via Testing and Open-Air Garden-Based Education. "How Fluent Do I Need to Be to Say I'm Fluent?" Research Experiences of Communities that Speak Languages Other than English. The Equity Impact of Universal Home Visits to Pregnant Women and Their Spouses in Bauchi State, Nigeria: Secondary Analysis From a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. "How to Make it Out Alive": A Strengths-Based Analysis of Latinas' Adolescent Sexual Health Experiences. Centering Communities in Global Health: Using Human-Centered Design to Facilitate Collaboration and Intervention Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1