Trajectories of body mass index and combustible and electronic cigarette use across adolescence: Findings from the PATH study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107901
Derrick S. Lee , Alayna P. Tackett , Christine Naya , Alyssa F. Harlow , Tyler B. Mason
{"title":"Trajectories of body mass index and combustible and electronic cigarette use across adolescence: Findings from the PATH study","authors":"Derrick S. Lee ,&nbsp;Alayna P. Tackett ,&nbsp;Christine Naya ,&nbsp;Alyssa F. Harlow ,&nbsp;Tyler B. Mason","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Associations between empirically-generated body mass index (BMI) trajectories and risk of current use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes across adolescence were examined using longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PATH study is an ongoing annual longitudinal population-based study of adolescents. We utilized Waves 1–4 conducted from 2013 to 2017. Adolescents completed self-reported surveys of their height, weight, and current tobacco use at Waves 1–4 and their tobacco weight control beliefs at Waves 1–2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Using latent growth mixture modeling, six trajectories of BMI were identified. The largest group (“normal weight increasing;” <em>n</em> = 4,858; 86.6 %), which was used as the comparator in subsequent analyses, consisted of adolescents ages 12–17 who were normal weight at Wave 1 with a significant increase in BMI across Waves 2––4. The “overweight early increasing,” “overweight late increasing,” and “obesity stable” classes had greater likelihood of current combustible cigarette use during the study compared to the “normal weight increasing class.” The “overweight early increasing,” “overweight late increasing,” and “overweight increasing then decreasing” classes showed elevated risk for e-cigarette use during the study. Compared to those in the “normal weight increasing” class, those in the “overweight increasing then decreasing” and “obesity stable” classes had greater weight control beliefs at Wave 1 and those in the “obesity stable” class had greater weight control beliefs at Wave 2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings highlight the importance of weight trajectories and weight control beliefs by tobacco product use across adolescence and the need for mechanistic and intervention research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 107901"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460323002964","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Associations between empirically-generated body mass index (BMI) trajectories and risk of current use of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes across adolescence were examined using longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study.

Methods

The PATH study is an ongoing annual longitudinal population-based study of adolescents. We utilized Waves 1–4 conducted from 2013 to 2017. Adolescents completed self-reported surveys of their height, weight, and current tobacco use at Waves 1–4 and their tobacco weight control beliefs at Waves 1–2.

Results

Using latent growth mixture modeling, six trajectories of BMI were identified. The largest group (“normal weight increasing;” n = 4,858; 86.6 %), which was used as the comparator in subsequent analyses, consisted of adolescents ages 12–17 who were normal weight at Wave 1 with a significant increase in BMI across Waves 2––4. The “overweight early increasing,” “overweight late increasing,” and “obesity stable” classes had greater likelihood of current combustible cigarette use during the study compared to the “normal weight increasing class.” The “overweight early increasing,” “overweight late increasing,” and “overweight increasing then decreasing” classes showed elevated risk for e-cigarette use during the study. Compared to those in the “normal weight increasing” class, those in the “overweight increasing then decreasing” and “obesity stable” classes had greater weight control beliefs at Wave 1 and those in the “obesity stable” class had greater weight control beliefs at Wave 2.

Conclusions

Findings highlight the importance of weight trajectories and weight control beliefs by tobacco product use across adolescence and the need for mechanistic and intervention research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年时期身体质量指数、可燃烟和电子烟使用轨迹:PATH研究结果。
目的:使用烟草与健康人口评估(PATH)研究的纵向数据,研究了经验生成的身体质量指数(BMI)轨迹与青春期当前使用可燃香烟和电子烟的风险之间的关系。方法:PATH研究是一项正在进行的基于青少年的年度纵向人群研究。我们使用了2013年至2017年进行的Waves 1-4。青少年在第1-4波完成了对他们身高、体重和当前烟草使用情况的自我报告调查,在第1-2波完成了他们对烟草重量控制信念的调查。结果:使用潜在生长混合物模型,确定了六个BMI轨迹。最大的一组(“正常体重增加;”n=4858;86.6%),在随后的分析中用作对照,由12-17岁的青少年组成,他们在第1波中体重正常,在第2-4波中BMI显著增加。在研究期间,“超重早增”、“超重晚增”和“肥胖稳定”类别与“正常体重增加类别”相比,目前使用可燃香烟的可能性更大。“超重早增加”、“体重晚增”以及“超重增加后减少”类别在研究期间使用电子烟的风险更高。与“正常增重”组相比,“超重增加然后减少”和“肥胖稳定”组的人在第1波中有更大的体重控制信念,而“肥胖稳定的”组的那些人在第2波中有更多的体重控制信仰。结论:研究结果强调了青少年时期吸烟产品使用的体重轨迹和体重控制信念的重要性,以及机制和干预的必要性研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
Cannabis use regimens in trauma-exposed individuals: Associations with cannabis use quantity and frequency The effect of rumination on problematic mobile phone use among female freshmen: A moderated mediation model Editorial Board Role of social-cognitive factors in the relationship between e-cigarette use and subsequent cigarette smoking among U.S. youth: A causal mediation analysis E-cigarette access and age verification among adolescents, young adults, and adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1