Julinela Armenta-Morales, Dulce Mariel Ruiz-Sánchez, Daniela Rivero-Yeverino, José Sergio Papaqui-Tapia, Juan Jesús Rios-López, Aida Inés Lopez-Garcia, Chrystopherson Caballero-López, Yosahandi Pacheco-Jiménez
{"title":"[Diagnóstico de alergia inmediata para penicilina: estudio piloto].","authors":"Julinela Armenta-Morales, Dulce Mariel Ruiz-Sánchez, Daniela Rivero-Yeverino, José Sergio Papaqui-Tapia, Juan Jesús Rios-López, Aida Inés Lopez-Garcia, Chrystopherson Caballero-López, Yosahandi Pacheco-Jiménez","doi":"10.29262/ram.v70i3.1261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To confirm the presence of allergy to penicillin and amoxicillin by in vivo exposure tests in patients with a history of immediate reaction to these drugs. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and prolective study. Patients between 12 and 60 years old with a history of immediate reaction after administration of penicillin and/or amoxicillin were included. Skin prick and intradermal tests were performed with benzylpenicilloyl polylysine and penicillin G, as well as oral challenge with amoxicillin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten female and 3 male patients were included. The mean age was 39 years. In 84.6% of the cases the last adverse drug reaction occurred 10 years ago and in all cases it manifested with urticaria. Allergy to penicillin was corroborated in only 38.4% of cases. The most frequent adverse reaction after in vivo exposure tests was pruritus in 23%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with suspected penicillin allergy should be evaluated by in vivo exposure testing with major and minor determinants to corroborate or rule out allergic reactions and improve treatment conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101421,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","volume":"70 4","pages":"191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico (Tecamachalco, Puebla, Mexico : 1993)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v70i3.1261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To confirm the presence of allergy to penicillin and amoxicillin by in vivo exposure tests in patients with a history of immediate reaction to these drugs. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, descriptive and prolective study. Patients between 12 and 60 years old with a history of immediate reaction after administration of penicillin and/or amoxicillin were included. Skin prick and intradermal tests were performed with benzylpenicilloyl polylysine and penicillin G, as well as oral challenge with amoxicillin.
Results: Ten female and 3 male patients were included. The mean age was 39 years. In 84.6% of the cases the last adverse drug reaction occurred 10 years ago and in all cases it manifested with urticaria. Allergy to penicillin was corroborated in only 38.4% of cases. The most frequent adverse reaction after in vivo exposure tests was pruritus in 23%.
Conclusions: Patients with suspected penicillin allergy should be evaluated by in vivo exposure testing with major and minor determinants to corroborate or rule out allergic reactions and improve treatment conditions.