Diagnostic value of total serum/free prostate specific antigen and prostate cancer antigen-3 levels in prostate cancer.

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2023-10-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01
Mohammad Yazdani, Narjes Saberi, Azar Baradaran, Zahra Mohajeri
{"title":"Diagnostic value of total serum/free prostate specific antigen and prostate cancer antigen-3 levels in prostate cancer.","authors":"Mohammad Yazdani, Narjes Saberi, Azar Baradaran, Zahra Mohajeri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare serum total and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and serum prostate cancer antigen-3 (PCA3) levels in patients with prostate cancer in 2018 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was a prospective case-control study. The case group included all patients with suspected prostate cancer, and the control group included individuals without prostate disease who were referred to Ali Asghar and Nour Hospital in Isfahan, Iran, from October 2018 to October 2020. The serum total PSA, free PSA, and PCA3 levels in both groups were measured using the ELISA method with standard kits and compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were matched in terms of age and body mass index (BMI). The results showed that the mean free PSA level in the control group was significantly higher than that in the case group (P<0.05). Conversely, the mean total PSA level in the case group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in the mean PCA3 levels between the case and control groups. In addition, the total PSA variable with a cutoff of ≤3.14 exhibited 93% sensitivity and 82% specificity, demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between prostate cancer and healthy individuals. Similarly, the PCA3 value with a cutoff of ≤3.5 had a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 72%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the study results indicated that total PSA and PCA3 levels have higher diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing patients with suspected prostate cancer from healthy individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"11 5","pages":"414-419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10628628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare serum total and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and serum prostate cancer antigen-3 (PCA3) levels in patients with prostate cancer in 2018 and 2019.

Methods: This research was a prospective case-control study. The case group included all patients with suspected prostate cancer, and the control group included individuals without prostate disease who were referred to Ali Asghar and Nour Hospital in Isfahan, Iran, from October 2018 to October 2020. The serum total PSA, free PSA, and PCA3 levels in both groups were measured using the ELISA method with standard kits and compared between the groups.

Results: The two groups were matched in terms of age and body mass index (BMI). The results showed that the mean free PSA level in the control group was significantly higher than that in the case group (P<0.05). Conversely, the mean total PSA level in the case group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in the mean PCA3 levels between the case and control groups. In addition, the total PSA variable with a cutoff of ≤3.14 exhibited 93% sensitivity and 82% specificity, demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between prostate cancer and healthy individuals. Similarly, the PCA3 value with a cutoff of ≤3.5 had a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 72%, respectively.

Conclusion: Overall, the study results indicated that total PSA and PCA3 levels have higher diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing patients with suspected prostate cancer from healthy individuals.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清/游离前列腺特异性抗原和前列腺癌症抗原-3水平对癌症的诊断价值。
背景:本研究旨在比较2018年和2019年癌症前列腺患者血清总和游离前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平以及血清前列腺癌症抗原-3(PCA3)水平。方法:本研究为前瞻性病例对照研究。病例组包括所有疑似前列腺癌症患者,对照组包括2018年10月至2020年10月转诊至伊朗伊斯法罕Ali Asghar和Nour医院的无前列腺疾病患者。使用ELISA方法和标准试剂盒测量两组的血清总PSA、游离PSA和PCA3水平,并在两组之间进行比较。结果:两组在年龄和体重指数(BMI)方面匹配。结果显示,对照组的平均游离PSA水平显著高于病例组(P结论:总体而言,研究结果表明,总PSA和PCA3水平在区分疑似前列腺癌症患者和健康个体方面具有更高的诊断准确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian randomisation approach to explore genetic factors associated with erectile dysfunction based on pooled genomic data. Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid as an alternative for prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL): a randomized controlled trial. Decreased expression of LncRNA CRYM-AS1 promotes apoptosis through the Hippo-YAP1 signaling pathway leading to diabetic erectile dysfunction. Minimally invasive management of extraperitoneal bladder injury with extension to the trigone of the bladder with bilateral external ureteral catheterization: innovative approach instead of open surgical treatment. N4-acetyl-sulfamethoxazole stone in a patient on chronic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole therapy: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1