Does doffing the FEES Box generate a significant cloud of particles after aerosol-generating procedures? A proof-of-concept study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1080/17549507.2023.2264541
Anne Li, Michelle G Ganann, Jessica M Pisegna
{"title":"Does doffing the FEES Box generate a significant cloud of particles after aerosol-generating procedures? A proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Anne Li, Michelle G Ganann, Jessica M Pisegna","doi":"10.1080/17549507.2023.2264541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The spread of airborne diseases, including coronaviruses, remains a widespread public health concern. Published studies outline the use of protective barriers to limit the spread of pathogenic particles and droplets resulting from coughing, sneezing, and talking. The findings suggest a role for these barriers during aerosol-generating procedures, such as flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). However, the question remains of whether doffing a protective barrier will create a concentrated cloud of particles that will increase health professionals' exposure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We simulated four clinical scenarios of coughing and sneezing, talking, eating and drinking, and delivering supplemental oxygen to test whether doffing the FEES Box protective barrier would result in a particle cloud.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>For all scenarios simulated, doffing the FEES Box did not result in a significant increase in mean particle count. Further, the manner of FEES Box removal did not significantly influence mean particle counts on a consistent basis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that doffing the FEES Box does not increase exposure to airborne particles. Although more research is needed to confirm these findings, FEES Box usage should be considered during aerosol-generating procedures, to protect and reassure healthcare professionals who work with patients with COVID-19 or other airborne diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":49047,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"833-844"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2023.2264541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The spread of airborne diseases, including coronaviruses, remains a widespread public health concern. Published studies outline the use of protective barriers to limit the spread of pathogenic particles and droplets resulting from coughing, sneezing, and talking. The findings suggest a role for these barriers during aerosol-generating procedures, such as flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). However, the question remains of whether doffing a protective barrier will create a concentrated cloud of particles that will increase health professionals' exposure.

Method: We simulated four clinical scenarios of coughing and sneezing, talking, eating and drinking, and delivering supplemental oxygen to test whether doffing the FEES Box protective barrier would result in a particle cloud.

Result: For all scenarios simulated, doffing the FEES Box did not result in a significant increase in mean particle count. Further, the manner of FEES Box removal did not significantly influence mean particle counts on a consistent basis.

Conclusion: These results suggest that doffing the FEES Box does not increase exposure to airborne particles. Although more research is needed to confirm these findings, FEES Box usage should be considered during aerosol-generating procedures, to protect and reassure healthcare professionals who work with patients with COVID-19 or other airborne diseases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在气溶胶产生过程之后,脱下FEES盒子是否会产生大量的颗粒云?概念验证研究。
目的:包括冠状病毒在内的空气传播疾病仍然是一个广泛的公共卫生问题。已发表的研究概述了使用防护屏障来限制咳嗽、打喷嚏和说话引起的致病颗粒和飞沫的传播。研究结果表明,这些屏障在气溶胶产生过程中发挥了作用,例如灵活的吞咽内镜评估(FEES)。然而,问题仍然是,脱下防护屏障是否会产生一团集中的颗粒物,增加卫生专业人员的暴露量。方法:我们模拟了咳嗽和打喷嚏、说话、吃饭和喝水以及提供补充氧气的四种临床场景,以测试脱下FEES Box保护屏障是否会导致颗粒云。结果:对于模拟的所有场景,脱下FEES盒子并没有导致平均粒子数的显著增加。此外,在一致的基础上,去除FEES盒的方式没有显著影响平均颗粒计数。结论:这些结果表明,脱下FEES盒子不会增加空气中颗粒物的暴露。尽管还需要更多的研究来证实这些发现,但在气雾剂生成过程中应考虑FEES Box的使用,以保护和安抚与新冠肺炎或其他空气传播疾病患者一起工作的医疗保健专业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is an international journal which promotes discussion on a broad range of current clinical and theoretical issues. Submissions may include experimental, review and theoretical discussion papers, with studies from either quantitative and/or qualitative frameworks. Articles may relate to any area of child or adult communication or dysphagia, furthering knowledge on issues related to etiology, assessment, diagnosis, intervention, or theoretical frameworks. Articles can be accompanied by supplementary audio and video files that will be uploaded to the journal’s website. Special issues on contemporary topics are published at least once a year. A scientific forum is included in many issues, where a topic is debated by invited international experts.
期刊最新文献
Effects of LSVT LOUD and EMST in individuals with Parkinson's disease: A two arm non-randomized clinical trial. Is there a doctor in the house? Roles and practices in videofluoroscopic swallowing assessment of structural abnormalities. The word learning dynamic assessment protocol (WorLDAP): Exploring speech-language pathologists' perceptions of the acceptability of a novel assessment tool. The complexities of diagnosis: New Zealand parents' knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of identification of their children's language and literacy difficulties. The role of speech-language pathologists in frailty: An Australian qualitative study of perceptions, practices, and opportunities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1