The impact of patient–provider relationships on choosing between VA and VA-purchased care: A qualitative study of health care decision-making among rural veterans

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.1111/jrh.12804
Daniel D. Ball PhD, Anne G. Sadler PhD, Melissa J. Steffen MPH, Monica B. Paez BA, Michelle A. Mengeling PhD
{"title":"The impact of patient–provider relationships on choosing between VA and VA-purchased care: A qualitative study of health care decision-making among rural veterans","authors":"Daniel D. Ball PhD,&nbsp;Anne G. Sadler PhD,&nbsp;Melissa J. Steffen MPH,&nbsp;Monica B. Paez BA,&nbsp;Michelle A. Mengeling PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Since the Choice Act in 2014, many Veterans have had greater options for seeking Veteran Affairs (VA)-purchased care in the community. We investigated factors that influence rural Veterans’ decisions regarding where to seek care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We utilized semi-structured telephone interviews to query Veterans living in rural or highly rural areas of Midwestern states about their health care options, preferences, and experiences. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, thematically coded, and deductively analyzed using a socioecological approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Forty rural Veterans (20 men/20 women) ages 28–76 years completed interviews in 2019. We found that rural Veterans often spoke about their relationships and interactions with providers as an important factor in deciding where to seek care. They expressed three socioecological qualities of patient–provider relationships that affected their decisions: (1) personal level—rural Veterans traveled longer distances for more compatible patient–provider relationships; (2) interpersonal level—they sought stable patient–provider relationships that encouraged familiarity, trust, and communication; and (3) organizational level—they emphasized shared identities and expertise that fostered a sense of belonging with their provider. Participants also described how impersonal interactions, status differences, and staff turnover impacted their choice of provider and were disruptive to patient–provider relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Rural Veterans’ interview responses suggest exploring innovative ways to measure socioecological dimensions (i.e., personal, interpersonal, and organizational) of access-related decisions and patient–provider relationships to better understand health care barriers and needs. Such measures align with the VA's Whole Health approach that emphasizes person-centered care and the value of social relationships to Veterans’ health.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Since the Choice Act in 2014, many Veterans have had greater options for seeking Veteran Affairs (VA)-purchased care in the community. We investigated factors that influence rural Veterans’ decisions regarding where to seek care.

Methods

We utilized semi-structured telephone interviews to query Veterans living in rural or highly rural areas of Midwestern states about their health care options, preferences, and experiences. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, thematically coded, and deductively analyzed using a socioecological approach.

Findings

Forty rural Veterans (20 men/20 women) ages 28–76 years completed interviews in 2019. We found that rural Veterans often spoke about their relationships and interactions with providers as an important factor in deciding where to seek care. They expressed three socioecological qualities of patient–provider relationships that affected their decisions: (1) personal level—rural Veterans traveled longer distances for more compatible patient–provider relationships; (2) interpersonal level—they sought stable patient–provider relationships that encouraged familiarity, trust, and communication; and (3) organizational level—they emphasized shared identities and expertise that fostered a sense of belonging with their provider. Participants also described how impersonal interactions, status differences, and staff turnover impacted their choice of provider and were disruptive to patient–provider relationships.

Conclusions

Rural Veterans’ interview responses suggest exploring innovative ways to measure socioecological dimensions (i.e., personal, interpersonal, and organizational) of access-related decisions and patient–provider relationships to better understand health care barriers and needs. Such measures align with the VA's Whole Health approach that emphasizes person-centered care and the value of social relationships to Veterans’ health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者-提供者关系对退伍军人事务部和退伍军人事务部购买护理之间选择的影响:农村退伍军人医疗保健决策的定性研究。
目的:自2014年《选择法案》以来,许多退伍军人在寻求退伍军人事务(VA)方面有了更大的选择,即在社区购买护理。我们调查了影响农村退伍军人在哪里寻求护理的决定的因素。方法:我们采用半结构化的电话采访,询问居住在中西部农村或高度农村地区的退伍军人的医疗保健选择、偏好和经历。访谈被记录和转录,主题编码,并使用社会生态学方法进行演绎分析。调查结果:40名年龄在28-76岁的农村退伍军人(20名男性/20名女性)在2019年完成了访谈。我们发现,农村退伍军人经常谈到他们与提供者的关系和互动,这是决定在哪里寻求护理的重要因素。他们表达了影响他们决策的患者-提供者关系的三个社会生态品质:(1)个人层面的农村退伍军人为了更兼容的患者-供应者关系而长途跋涉;(2) 人际层面,他们寻求稳定的患者-提供者关系,鼓励熟悉、信任和沟通;以及(3)在组织层面,他们强调共同的身份和专业知识,以培养与提供者的归属感。参与者还描述了非个人互动、地位差异和员工流动如何影响他们对提供者的选择,并破坏患者与提供者的关系。结论:农村退伍军人的访谈回答建议探索创新的方法来衡量与获取相关决策和患者-提供者关系的社会生态维度(即个人、人际和组织),以更好地了解医疗保健障碍和需求。这些措施与退伍军人事务部的整体健康方法相一致,该方法强调以人为中心的护理和社会关系对退伍军人健康的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes and profitability following rural hospital mergers and acquisitions. Community responses and adaptations following the closure of a rural pharmacy and primary care facility. Weight status underestimation and weight management goals among adults in the rural South of the United States. Social needs and health outcomes in two rural Veteran populations. Association between obesogenic environments and childhood overweight/obesity across the United States: Differences by rurality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1