Efficacy and Safety of Makabuhay (Tinospora rumphii) 25% Cream Versus Hydrocortisone 1% Cream in the Management of Mosquito Bite Reactions: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.

Q3 Medicine JMIR dermatology Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.2196/50380
Julius Garcia Gatmaitan, Jolene Kristine Garcia Gatmaitan-Dumlao, Johannes Dayrit, Ma Teresita Gabriel
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Makabuhay (Tinospora rumphii) 25% Cream Versus Hydrocortisone 1% Cream in the Management of Mosquito Bite Reactions: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.","authors":"Julius Garcia Gatmaitan, Jolene Kristine Garcia Gatmaitan-Dumlao, Johannes Dayrit, Ma Teresita Gabriel","doi":"10.2196/50380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most insect bite reactions resolve spontaneously, but the inflammation and pruritus induced have been shown to decrease the quality of life. Previous studies have shown the potential anti-inflammatory properties of Tinospora rumphii.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of T rumphii 25% cream versus hydrocortisone 1% cream in the management of local cutaneous reactions caused by mosquito bites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 1-week duration in a span of 3 months (June 2019 to August 2019). Participants were exposed to sterile noninfectious mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti) for 5-10 minutes to elicit cutaneous lesions. Tinospora 25% cream or hydrocortisone 1% cream was applied twice daily throughout the 7-day study period. Of the 70 participants screened for this study, which was approved by an institutional review board (IRB 2019-07) at the Dermatology Outpatient Department of the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Alabang, Muntinlupa, Philippines, 58 participants in total met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to treatment (Tinospora: n=29) and active control (hydrocortisone: n=29) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 58 participants were randomized to receive Tinospora cream (n=29) or hydrocortisone cream (n=29). All participants completed the follow-up. There was a significant decrease in lesion size in both groups from the first 15 minutes to day 7 (P<.001). Comparing the lesion size in both groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in lesion size in the first hour (P=.003) and after 24 hours (P=.03). On day 1, 10% (n=29) of participants in the hydrocortisone group and 7% (n=29) in the Tinospora group experienced complete resolution. On day 3, all participants experienced complete resolution. No adverse effects were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tinospora 25% cream is safe, effective, and comparable to hydrocortisone 1% cream as an anti-inflammatory agent for mosquito bite reactions based on the decrease in lesion size, the proportion of participants with complete resolution of wheals, and improvement in pruritus intensity score using a visual analog scale. Long-term safety studies are recommended.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Philippine Health Research Registry PHRR230716-005932; https://www.herdin.ph/index.php/registry?view=research&layout=details&cid=5932.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"6 ","pages":"e50380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10666022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most insect bite reactions resolve spontaneously, but the inflammation and pruritus induced have been shown to decrease the quality of life. Previous studies have shown the potential anti-inflammatory properties of Tinospora rumphii.

Objective: The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of T rumphii 25% cream versus hydrocortisone 1% cream in the management of local cutaneous reactions caused by mosquito bites.

Methods: This study was a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 1-week duration in a span of 3 months (June 2019 to August 2019). Participants were exposed to sterile noninfectious mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti) for 5-10 minutes to elicit cutaneous lesions. Tinospora 25% cream or hydrocortisone 1% cream was applied twice daily throughout the 7-day study period. Of the 70 participants screened for this study, which was approved by an institutional review board (IRB 2019-07) at the Dermatology Outpatient Department of the Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Alabang, Muntinlupa, Philippines, 58 participants in total met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to treatment (Tinospora: n=29) and active control (hydrocortisone: n=29) groups.

Results: In total, 58 participants were randomized to receive Tinospora cream (n=29) or hydrocortisone cream (n=29). All participants completed the follow-up. There was a significant decrease in lesion size in both groups from the first 15 minutes to day 7 (P<.001). Comparing the lesion size in both groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in lesion size in the first hour (P=.003) and after 24 hours (P=.03). On day 1, 10% (n=29) of participants in the hydrocortisone group and 7% (n=29) in the Tinospora group experienced complete resolution. On day 3, all participants experienced complete resolution. No adverse effects were documented.

Conclusions: Tinospora 25% cream is safe, effective, and comparable to hydrocortisone 1% cream as an anti-inflammatory agent for mosquito bite reactions based on the decrease in lesion size, the proportion of participants with complete resolution of wheals, and improvement in pruritus intensity score using a visual analog scale. Long-term safety studies are recommended.

Trial registration: Philippine Health Research Registry PHRR230716-005932; https://www.herdin.ph/index.php/registry?view=research&layout=details&cid=5932.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Makabuhay(Tinospora rumphii)25%乳膏与1%氢化可的松乳膏治疗蚊虫叮咬反应的疗效和安全性:随机双盲对照试验。
背景:大多数昆虫叮咬反应会自行解决,但炎症和瘙痒已被证明会降低生活质量。先前的研究已经显示了臀部小蠊的潜在抗炎特性。目的:本研究的目的是评估25%曲姆菲乳膏与1%氢化可的松乳膏治疗蚊虫叮咬引起的局部皮肤反应的有效性和安全性。方法:本研究是一项平行组、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,为期1周,为期3个月(2019年6月至2019年8月)。参与者暴露于无菌的非感染性蚊子(埃及伊蚊)5-10分钟,以引起皮肤损伤。在为期7天的研究期间,每天两次使用25%Tinospora乳膏或1%氢化可的松乳膏。这项研究得到了菲律宾蒙廷鲁帕阿拉邦热带医学研究所皮肤病门诊部机构审查委员会(IRB 2019-07)的批准,在筛选的70名参与者中,共有58名参与者符合纳入标准,并被随机分为治疗组(Tinospora:n=29)和主动对照组(氢化可的松:n=29)。结果:总共有58名参与者被随机分配接受Tinospora乳膏(n=29)或氢化可的松乳膏(n=9)。所有参与者都完成了随访。从最初的15分钟到第7天,两组的病变大小都显著减小(结论:25%Tinospora乳膏是安全、有效的,与1%氢化可的松乳膏相比,它是一种治疗蚊子叮咬反应的抗炎剂,其作用是减少病变面积、完全消除风团的参与者比例以及使用视觉模拟量表改善瘙痒强度评分。建议进行长期安全性研究。试验注册:Philippine健康研究注册PHRR230716-005932;https://www.herdin.ph/index.php/registry?view=research&layout=details&cid=5932.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Dermoscopy Use Among Dermatology Residents in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study. Patterns of Public Interest in Lipomas and Lipoma-Removal Procedures: Google Trends Analysis. The Comparative Sufficiency of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI in Answering Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis Questions About Common Dermatological Diagnoses. Modern Digital Query Analytics of Patient Education Materials on Acanthosis Nigricans: Systematic Search and Content Analysis. The Depth Estimation and Visualization of Dermatological Lesions: Development and Usability Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1