Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review

Ikwinder Preet Kaur , Mohsin Sheraz Mughal , Fawad Aslam , Jennifer Schram , Pankaj Bansal
{"title":"Non-surgical treatment of aseptic olecranon bursitis: A systematic review","authors":"Ikwinder Preet Kaur ,&nbsp;Mohsin Sheraz Mughal ,&nbsp;Fawad Aslam ,&nbsp;Jennifer Schram ,&nbsp;Pankaj Bansal","doi":"10.1016/j.reumae.2023.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Olecranon bursitis (OB), characterized by inflammation and fluid collection in the olecranon bursa is a commonly encountered out-patient condition. The data is heterogeneous regarding a stepwise and standardized approach to aseptic OB treatment and the efficacy of intra-bursal corticosteroid injections (CSI). The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the non-surgical treatment options for aseptic OB.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. The English and non-English literature search was performed in 5 medical databases to identify studies evaluating the treatment of OB. All included studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB) using the revised Cochrane RoB tool for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case–control and cohort studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For the final analyses, 2 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. The RoB for the RCTs was high and both failed to demonstrate a significant difference in terms of the resolution of OB and bursal tenderness among various invasive and non-invasive treatment options. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with a significant decline in the duration of symptoms. However, it was associated with a higher number of complications including bursal infection and skin atrophy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on the available data, it appears that the clinical resolution of aseptic OB can occur with conservative methods if implemented earlier in the disease course. Although CSI is more effective than other treatments, it should be reserved for refractory cases because of a higher complication rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94193,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S217357432300103X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Olecranon bursitis (OB), characterized by inflammation and fluid collection in the olecranon bursa is a commonly encountered out-patient condition. The data is heterogeneous regarding a stepwise and standardized approach to aseptic OB treatment and the efficacy of intra-bursal corticosteroid injections (CSI). The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the non-surgical treatment options for aseptic OB.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations. The English and non-English literature search was performed in 5 medical databases to identify studies evaluating the treatment of OB. All included studies were evaluated for risk of bias (RoB) using the revised Cochrane RoB tool for randomized control trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for case–control and cohort studies.

Results

For the final analyses, 2 RCTs and 2 observational studies were included. The RoB for the RCTs was high and both failed to demonstrate a significant difference in terms of the resolution of OB and bursal tenderness among various invasive and non-invasive treatment options. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) was associated with a significant decline in the duration of symptoms. However, it was associated with a higher number of complications including bursal infection and skin atrophy.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, it appears that the clinical resolution of aseptic OB can occur with conservative methods if implemented earlier in the disease course. Although CSI is more effective than other treatments, it should be reserved for refractory cases because of a higher complication rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无菌性鹰嘴滑囊炎的非手术治疗:系统综述
目的鹰嘴滑囊炎(OB)是一种常见的门诊疾病,以鹰嘴囊炎症和积液为特征。关于无菌OB治疗的逐步标准化方法和囊内皮质类固醇注射(CSI)的疗效,数据是异质的。本综述的目的是系统评价无菌性产科的非手术治疗方案。方法根据PRISMA的建议进行系统评价。在5个医学数据库中进行英语和非英语文献检索,以确定评估OB治疗的研究。所有纳入的研究均使用修订的Cochrane RoB工具进行随机对照试验(RCT),并使用Newcastle Ottawa量表(NOS)进行病例对照和队列研究,以评估偏倚风险(RoB)。结果最终分析包括2项随机对照试验和2项观察性研究。随机对照试验的RoB很高,在各种侵入性和非侵入性治疗方案中,两者在OB和法氏囊压痛的分辨率方面都没有显示出显著差异。皮质类固醇注射(CSI)与症状持续时间的显著下降有关。然而,它与更高数量的并发症有关,包括法氏囊感染和皮肤萎缩。结论根据现有数据,如果在病程早期实施,无菌性产科的临床解决方案可以采用保守的方法。尽管CSI比其他治疗方法更有效,但由于并发症发生率较高,应将其保留在难治性病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fibromyalgia with elevated rheumatoid factor is associated with poor therapeutic response but not with progression to rheumatoid arthritis. Prospective cohort study. Inclusion Body Myositis: A Late Diagnosis Case Report. Prevalence of occipital enthesophyte in non-inflammatory and inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of gravitational therapy in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis. Clinical Practice Mexican Guidelines for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: 2024 Update.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1