Ablación percutánea de tumores renales: resultados a largo plazo

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING RADIOLOGIA Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rx.2021.12.003
J.L. del Cura Rodríguez , R. Zabala-Landa , I. Korta-Gomez
{"title":"Ablación percutánea de tumores renales: resultados a largo plazo","authors":"J.L. del Cura Rodríguez ,&nbsp;R. Zabala-Landa ,&nbsp;I. Korta-Gomez","doi":"10.1016/j.rx.2021.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the long-term outcomes of renal tumor ablation, analyzing efficacy, long-term survival, and factors associated with complications and therapeutic success.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed 305 ablations (generally done with expandable electrodes) of 273 renal tumors between May 2005 and April 2019. We analyzed survival, primary and secondary efficacy, and complications according to various patient factors and tumor characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean blood creatinine was 1.14 mg/dL before treatment and 1.30 mg/dL after treatment (<em>p</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). Complications were observed in 13.25% of the ablations, including major complications in in 4.97%. Complications were associated with age (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.013) and tumor diameter (<em>p</em> &lt;<!--> <!-->0.0001). Primary efficacy was 96.28%. Incomplete ablation was more common in lesions measuring<!--> <!-->&gt; 4 cm in diameter (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002). Secondary efficacy was 95.28%. The only factor associated with the risk of recurrence was the size of the tumor (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02). Overall survival was 95.26% at 1 year, 77.01% at 5 years, and 51.78% at 10 years, with no differences between patients with malignant and benign lesions. Mortality was higher in patients with creatinine<!--> <!-->&gt;1 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05) or ASA<!--> <!-->&gt; 2 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Percutaneous ablation is extremely efficacious for renal tumors; it improves the prognosis of renal carcinoma to the point where it does not differ from that of benign lesions. Complications are rare. Like survival, complications are associated with age and overall health status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31509,"journal":{"name":"RADIOLOGIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RADIOLOGIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033833822000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of renal tumor ablation, analyzing efficacy, long-term survival, and factors associated with complications and therapeutic success.

Material and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 305 ablations (generally done with expandable electrodes) of 273 renal tumors between May 2005 and April 2019. We analyzed survival, primary and secondary efficacy, and complications according to various patient factors and tumor characteristics.

Results

Mean blood creatinine was 1.14 mg/dL before treatment and 1.30 mg/dL after treatment (p < 0.0001). Complications were observed in 13.25% of the ablations, including major complications in in 4.97%. Complications were associated with age (p = 0.013) and tumor diameter (p < 0.0001). Primary efficacy was 96.28%. Incomplete ablation was more common in lesions measuring > 4 cm in diameter (p = 0.002). Secondary efficacy was 95.28%. The only factor associated with the risk of recurrence was the size of the tumor (p = 0.02). Overall survival was 95.26% at 1 year, 77.01% at 5 years, and 51.78% at 10 years, with no differences between patients with malignant and benign lesions. Mortality was higher in patients with creatinine >1 (p = 0.05) or ASA > 2 (p = 0.0001).

Conclusions

Percutaneous ablation is extremely efficacious for renal tumors; it improves the prognosis of renal carcinoma to the point where it does not differ from that of benign lesions. Complications are rare. Like survival, complications are associated with age and overall health status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾肿瘤经皮消融:长期结果
目的评价肾肿瘤切除术的长期疗效,分析疗效、长期生存率以及并发症和治疗成功的相关因素。材料和方法我们回顾性回顾了2005年5月至2019年4月期间273例肾肿瘤的305次消融(通常使用可膨胀电极)。我们根据各种患者因素和肿瘤特征分析了生存率、主要疗效和次要疗效以及并发症。结果平均血肌酐治疗前为1.14 mg/dL,治疗后为1.30 mg/dL(p<0.0001)。13.25%的消融出现并发症,其中4.97%出现主要并发症。并发症与年龄(p=0.013)和肿瘤直径(p<0.001)有关。主要疗效为96.28%。不完全消融在>;直径4cm(p=0.002)。次要疗效为95.28%。与复发风险相关的唯一因素是肿瘤的大小(p=0.02)。1年时总生存率为95.26%,5年时为77.01%,10年时为51.78%,恶性和良性病变患者之间没有差异。肌酸酐>;1(p=0.05)或ASA>;2(p=0.0001)。结论经皮肾切除术治疗肾肿瘤疗效显著;它可以改善肾癌的预后,使其与良性病变的预后没有区别。并发症很少。与生存率一样,并发症与年龄和整体健康状况有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RADIOLOGIA
RADIOLOGIA RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: La mejor revista para conocer de primera mano los originales más relevantes en la especialidad y las revisiones, casos y notas clínicas de mayor interés profesional. Además es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica.
期刊最新文献
Hallazgos por resonancia magnética de las mastitis inflamatorias de etiología desconocida Análisis y aspectos técnicos de las preguntas asociadas a imágenes radiológicas en el examen para médico interno residente en España, convocatoria 2022 Neuropatía óptica en imagen Miofibroblastoma de mama: 3 casos clínicos y revisión de la literatura médica Utilidad de la línea orbitomeatal superior sin incluir los cristalinos en la exploración con diferentes voltajes del tubo en la TC craneal pediátrica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1