Differences in invasion between human smooth muscle cells from umbilical vein, saphenous vein and internal mammary artery: relation to the expression of the plasminogen activation system

M.J. Wijnberg, L.G.M. Huisman, J.H. Verheijen
{"title":"Differences in invasion between human smooth muscle cells from umbilical vein, saphenous vein and internal mammary artery: relation to the expression of the plasminogen activation system","authors":"M.J. Wijnberg,&nbsp;L.G.M. Huisman,&nbsp;J.H. Verheijen","doi":"10.1054/fipr.2000.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Smooth muscle cells can express a range of phenotypes. Smooth muscle cells from intimal thickenings are phenotypically different from media smooth muscle cells. Migration and proliferation are important processes involved in the development of intimal t hickening. Several studies have demonstrated the role of the plasminogen activation system in the migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells. In this study we determined the proliferation and invasion capacity of smooth muscle cells (SMC) that we re isolated from three different types of vessels; saphenous vein (SV), internal mammary artery (IMA), and umbilical vein (UV). Whereas we found no differences in proliferation, we show that there are clear differences in the expression of t-PA, u-PA, an d PAI-1 and subsequent differences in plasminogen activator activity between the smooth muscle cell types. Whereas u-PA activity was low in all three cell types studied, t-PA activity was lowest in UV-SMC (0.25IU/10<sup>6</sup>cells), and higher in SV-SMC (0.8IU/10<sup>6</sup>cells) and IMA-SMC (1.2IU/10<sup>6</sup>cells). These findings could in part explain the differences we found in the invasion capacity of the smooth muscle cell types in an in vitro matrix invasion assay. Whereas the invasion of SV-SMC could be inhibited by an inhibitor of plasmin (aprotinin), the invasion of UV-SMC could not. Furthermore, the invasion of UV-SMC could be stimulated by active t-PA or u-PA, whereas the invasion of SV-SMC could not. The results for IMA-SMC were, however, more variable. These findings toget her suggest that phenotypically different smooth muscle cells exist between different vessel types, and may explain some of the differences in the ability of vessels to develop intimal thickening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100526,"journal":{"name":"Fibrinolysis and Proteolysis","volume":"14 6","pages":"Pages 358-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/fipr.2000.0092","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fibrinolysis and Proteolysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268949900900924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Smooth muscle cells can express a range of phenotypes. Smooth muscle cells from intimal thickenings are phenotypically different from media smooth muscle cells. Migration and proliferation are important processes involved in the development of intimal t hickening. Several studies have demonstrated the role of the plasminogen activation system in the migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells. In this study we determined the proliferation and invasion capacity of smooth muscle cells (SMC) that we re isolated from three different types of vessels; saphenous vein (SV), internal mammary artery (IMA), and umbilical vein (UV). Whereas we found no differences in proliferation, we show that there are clear differences in the expression of t-PA, u-PA, an d PAI-1 and subsequent differences in plasminogen activator activity between the smooth muscle cell types. Whereas u-PA activity was low in all three cell types studied, t-PA activity was lowest in UV-SMC (0.25IU/106cells), and higher in SV-SMC (0.8IU/106cells) and IMA-SMC (1.2IU/106cells). These findings could in part explain the differences we found in the invasion capacity of the smooth muscle cell types in an in vitro matrix invasion assay. Whereas the invasion of SV-SMC could be inhibited by an inhibitor of plasmin (aprotinin), the invasion of UV-SMC could not. Furthermore, the invasion of UV-SMC could be stimulated by active t-PA or u-PA, whereas the invasion of SV-SMC could not. The results for IMA-SMC were, however, more variable. These findings toget her suggest that phenotypically different smooth muscle cells exist between different vessel types, and may explain some of the differences in the ability of vessels to develop intimal thickening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人脐静脉、隐静脉和乳腺内动脉平滑肌细胞侵袭的差异:与纤溶酶原激活系统的表达有关
平滑肌细胞可以表达一系列表型。内膜增厚的平滑肌细胞在表型上与中膜平滑肌细胞不同。迁移和增殖是内膜增厚发展的重要过程。几项研究已经证明了纤溶酶原激活系统在平滑肌细胞迁移和增殖中的作用。在这项研究中,我们确定了从三种不同类型的血管中重新分离的平滑肌细胞(SMC)的增殖和侵袭能力;隐静脉(SV)、乳内动脉(IMA)和脐静脉(UV)。尽管我们没有发现增殖方面的差异,但我们发现,平滑肌细胞类型之间的t-PA、u-PA和d-PAI-1的表达以及随后的纤溶酶原激活剂活性存在明显差异。尽管u-PA活性在所研究的三种细胞类型中都很低,但t-PA活性在UV-SMC中最低(0.25IU/106细胞),在SV-SMC(0.8IU/106个细胞)和IMA-SMC(1.2IU/106几个细胞)中更高。这些发现可以部分解释我们在体外基质侵袭试验中发现的平滑肌细胞类型侵袭能力的差异。纤溶酶抑制剂(抑肽酶)可以抑制SV-SMC的侵袭,而UV-SMC则不能。此外,活性t-PA或u-PA可以刺激UV-SMC的侵袭,而SV-SMC则不能。然而,IMA-SMC的结果变化更大。这些发现表明,不同血管类型之间存在表型上不同的平滑肌细胞,这可能解释了血管发展内膜增厚能力的一些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Impaired liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in plasminogen deficient mice Covariance of metabolic and hemostatic risk indicators in men and women Endogeneous fibrinolysis and restenosis of peripheral arteries after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty Effects of low-molecular-weight heparin treatment on fibrinolytic markers in unstable coronary artery disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1