A Feature Selection Committee Method Using Empirical Mode Decomposition for Multiple Fault Classification in a Wind Turbine Gearbox

IF 2.6 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s10921-023-00996-0
Leonardo Oldani Felix, Dionísio Henrique Carvalho de Sá Só Martins, Ulisses Admar Barbosa Vicente Monteiro, Brenno Moura Castro, Luiz Antônio Vaz Pinto, Carlos Alfredo Orfão Martins
{"title":"A Feature Selection Committee Method Using Empirical Mode Decomposition for Multiple Fault Classification in a Wind Turbine Gearbox","authors":"Leonardo Oldani Felix,&nbsp;Dionísio Henrique Carvalho de Sá Só Martins,&nbsp;Ulisses Admar Barbosa Vicente Monteiro,&nbsp;Brenno Moura Castro,&nbsp;Luiz Antônio Vaz Pinto,&nbsp;Carlos Alfredo Orfão Martins","doi":"10.1007/s10921-023-00996-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Gearboxes are widely used in various industries such as aircrafts, automobiles, wind turbines, ship industries among others. Due its complex configuration, it is a challenging task to identify fault and failures patterns. Its internal components, such as bearings and gears, have different fault patterns, that can appear in one or in both components. The vibration signals were processed using the Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) to select the significant Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) and then 18 features were extract from this IMFs. Four features ranking techniques [ReliefF, Chi-Square, Max Relevance Min Redundancy (mRMR) and Decision Tree] were used in a committee to select the best feature set, among the 10 with the highest rank, that appears at least in 3 of the 4 methods. The new feature set was used as an input to Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) algorithms. The results showed that the use of the PCC value as a tool for selecting the significant IMFs, combined with the feature committee led to good results for this classification problem. In this case study, the ANN model outperformed the SVM and the RF algorithms, by using only 4 features to achieve 95.42% of accuracy and 6 features to achieve 100% of accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10921-023-00996-0.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10921-023-00996-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Gearboxes are widely used in various industries such as aircrafts, automobiles, wind turbines, ship industries among others. Due its complex configuration, it is a challenging task to identify fault and failures patterns. Its internal components, such as bearings and gears, have different fault patterns, that can appear in one or in both components. The vibration signals were processed using the Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) to select the significant Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) and then 18 features were extract from this IMFs. Four features ranking techniques [ReliefF, Chi-Square, Max Relevance Min Redundancy (mRMR) and Decision Tree] were used in a committee to select the best feature set, among the 10 with the highest rank, that appears at least in 3 of the 4 methods. The new feature set was used as an input to Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) algorithms. The results showed that the use of the PCC value as a tool for selecting the significant IMFs, combined with the feature committee led to good results for this classification problem. In this case study, the ANN model outperformed the SVM and the RF algorithms, by using only 4 features to achieve 95.42% of accuracy and 6 features to achieve 100% of accuracy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于经验模态分解的特征选择委员会方法在风电齿轮箱多故障分类中的应用
齿轮箱广泛应用于飞机、汽车、风力涡轮机、船舶等行业。由于其复杂的结构,识别故障和故障模式是一项具有挑战性的任务。其内部组件,如轴承和齿轮,具有不同的故障模式,可以出现在一个或两个组件中。利用经验模态分解(EMD)和Pearson相关系数(PCC)对振动信号进行处理,选择具有显著性的本征模态函数(IMFs),并从中提取18个特征。在一个委员会中使用了四种特征排序技术[ReliefF, Chi-Square, Max Relevance Min Redundancy (mRMR)和Decision Tree],从排名最高的10个特征集中选择最佳特征集,该特征集至少在4种方法中的3种中出现。新的特征集被用作支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)和人工神经网络(ANN)算法的输入。结果表明,使用PCC值作为选择重要imf的工具,并结合特征委员会,对该分类问题产生了良好的结果。在本案例研究中,ANN模型优于SVM和RF算法,仅使用4个特征即可达到95.42%的准确率,使用6个特征即可达到100%的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation provides a forum for the broad range of scientific and engineering activities involved in developing a quantitative nondestructive evaluation (NDE) capability. This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers on the development of new equipment, analyses, and approaches to nondestructive measurements.
期刊最新文献
Electromagnetic Radiation Characteristics and Mechanical Properties of Cement-Mortar Under Impact Load Instance Segmentation XXL-CT Challenge of a Historic Airplane Publisher Correction: Intelligent Extraction of Surface Cracks on LNG Outer Tanks Based on Close-Range Image Point Clouds and Infrared Imagery Acoustic Emission Signal Feature Extraction for Bearing Faults Using ACF and GMOMEDA Modeling and Analysis of Ellipticity Dispersion Characteristics of Lamb Waves in Pre-stressed Plates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1