Economics students: Self-selected in preferences and indoctrinated in beliefs

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS International Review of Economics Education Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iree.2021.100231
Antonio M. Espín , Manuel Correa , Alberto Ruiz-Villaverde
{"title":"Economics students: Self-selected in preferences and indoctrinated in beliefs","authors":"Antonio M. Espín ,&nbsp;Manuel Correa ,&nbsp;Alberto Ruiz-Villaverde","doi":"10.1016/j.iree.2021.100231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is much debate as to why economics students display more self-interested behavior than other students: whether <em>homo economicus</em> self-select into economics or students are instead “indoctrinated” by economics learning, and whether these effects impact on preferences or beliefs about others’ behavior. Using a classroom survey (n &gt; 500) with novel behavioral questions we show that, compared to students in other majors, econ students report being: (i) more self-interested (in particular, less compassionate or averse to advantageous inequality) already in the first year and the difference remains among more senior students; (ii) more likely to think that people will be unwilling to work if unemployment benefits increase (thus, endorsing the standard neoclassical view about others and the market), but only among senior students. These results suggest self-selection in preferences and indoctrination in beliefs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45496,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics Education","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388021000232/pdfft?md5=a4c1266db214290a602799f4c37cd3d8&pid=1-s2.0-S1477388021000232-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388021000232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is much debate as to why economics students display more self-interested behavior than other students: whether homo economicus self-select into economics or students are instead “indoctrinated” by economics learning, and whether these effects impact on preferences or beliefs about others’ behavior. Using a classroom survey (n > 500) with novel behavioral questions we show that, compared to students in other majors, econ students report being: (i) more self-interested (in particular, less compassionate or averse to advantageous inequality) already in the first year and the difference remains among more senior students; (ii) more likely to think that people will be unwilling to work if unemployment benefits increase (thus, endorsing the standard neoclassical view about others and the market), but only among senior students. These results suggest self-selection in preferences and indoctrination in beliefs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学专业的学生:自己选择喜好,灌输信仰
关于为什么经济学学生比其他学生表现出更多的自利行为,有很多争论:经济人是自我选择进入经济学,还是学生被经济学学习“灌输”,以及这些影响是否会影响对他人行为的偏好或信念。使用一项带有新颖行为问题的课堂调查(n>;500),我们发现,与其他专业的学生相比,经济学学生报告说:(i)在第一年就更感兴趣(特别是,不那么同情或反对有利的不平等),而这一差异在高年级学生中仍然存在;(ii)更有可能认为,如果失业救济金增加,人们将不愿意工作(因此,支持关于他人和市场的标准新古典主义观点),但仅限于高年级学生。这些结果表明在偏好上的自我选择和在信仰上的灌输。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
The belief that monetary exchanges are mutually beneficial: Are economics students different? Evidence from Guatemala Editorial Board Table of contents Online academic exams: Does multiplicity of exam versions mitigate cheating? Equity in hybrid microeconomics classes: Effects on diverse student groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1