Locus of control, self-efficacy, and student performance in an introductory economics course

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS International Review of Economics Education Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iree.2022.100234
Ahmad A Kader, PhD
{"title":"Locus of control, self-efficacy, and student performance in an introductory economics course","authors":"Ahmad A Kader, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.iree.2022.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>In the Principles of Microeconomics course taught during the Fall Semester 2019, 88 students participated in the completion of two questionnaires and a survey describing their demographic and academic profile. The two questionnaires included the 29 items of the Rotter </span>Locus of Control<span> Scale and the 10 items of the Schwarzer &amp; Jerusalem Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. The paper is intended to show that locus of control and self-efficacy are two distinct constructs not only in their influence on </span></span>student performance but also in their student profile interaction. Using the Locus of Control Scale, the class was divided by a median split of 12 into two equal-sized groups. The results show that internals (lower score) had a higher average exam score, had a higher cumulative GPA score, spent more time working, attended classes more often, and scored higher on the self-efficacy scale than externals (higher score). Using the Self-Efficacy Scale and dividing the class by a median split of 3.2 into equal-sized groups, high self-efficacy students had a higher average exam score, took more high school economics courses, and were internally oriented, as compared to the low self-efficacy students. Of the 88 students participating in the survey, 30 students were identified as having both low locus of control and high self-efficacy and 33 students were identified of having both high locus of control and low self-efficacy. The results show that the 30 students had a higher average exam score, had a higher cumulative GPA score, were more of white ethnicity, and took more high school economics courses, as compared to the 33 students. For the whole sample, the </span>correlation coefficient between locus of control and self-efficacy groups is negative and highly significant. The regression results show that the locus of control variable has a negative and significant effect, while the self-efficacy score has a positive and significant effect on the exam average. The adjusted R square value increased markedly with the addition of both locus of control and self-efficacy variables to the regression equation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45496,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics Education","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477388022000019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the Principles of Microeconomics course taught during the Fall Semester 2019, 88 students participated in the completion of two questionnaires and a survey describing their demographic and academic profile. The two questionnaires included the 29 items of the Rotter Locus of Control Scale and the 10 items of the Schwarzer & Jerusalem Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. The paper is intended to show that locus of control and self-efficacy are two distinct constructs not only in their influence on student performance but also in their student profile interaction. Using the Locus of Control Scale, the class was divided by a median split of 12 into two equal-sized groups. The results show that internals (lower score) had a higher average exam score, had a higher cumulative GPA score, spent more time working, attended classes more often, and scored higher on the self-efficacy scale than externals (higher score). Using the Self-Efficacy Scale and dividing the class by a median split of 3.2 into equal-sized groups, high self-efficacy students had a higher average exam score, took more high school economics courses, and were internally oriented, as compared to the low self-efficacy students. Of the 88 students participating in the survey, 30 students were identified as having both low locus of control and high self-efficacy and 33 students were identified of having both high locus of control and low self-efficacy. The results show that the 30 students had a higher average exam score, had a higher cumulative GPA score, were more of white ethnicity, and took more high school economics courses, as compared to the 33 students. For the whole sample, the correlation coefficient between locus of control and self-efficacy groups is negative and highly significant. The regression results show that the locus of control variable has a negative and significant effect, while the self-efficacy score has a positive and significant effect on the exam average. The adjusted R square value increased markedly with the addition of both locus of control and self-efficacy variables to the regression equation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济学导论课程中的控制点、自我效能与学生表现
在2019年秋季学期教授的微观经济学原理课程中,88名学生参与了两份问卷调查和一项描述其人口和学术状况的调查。两份问卷包括Rotter控制点量表的29个项目和Schwarzer&;耶路撒冷广义自我效能感量表。本文旨在表明,控制源和自我效能感是两个不同的结构,不仅在它们对学生表现的影响上,而且在它们的学生档案互动中。使用控制点量表,将该班按中位数12分为两组,每组人数相等。结果显示,与外部(得分较高)相比,内部(得分较低)的平均考试得分较高,累计GPA得分较高,工作时间更长,上课频率更高,自我效能感量表得分更高。与低自我效能感学生相比,使用自我效能感量表并以3.2的中位数将班级划分为同等规模的小组,高自我效能感的学生平均考试成绩更高,参加了更多的高中经济学课程,并且具有内在导向性。在参与调查的88名学生中,30名学生被确定为同时具有低控制源和高自我效能,33名学生被认定为同时具有高控制源和低自我效能。结果显示,与33名学生相比,这30名学生的平均考试成绩更高,累计平均绩点得分更高,更多的是白人,参加了更多的高中经济学课程。在整个样本中,控制源与自我效能感组之间的相关系数为负且高度显著。回归结果表明,控制变量的位点对考试平均成绩有负显著影响,而自我效能感得分对考试平均水平有正显著影响。在回归方程中加入控制点和自我效能变量后,调整后的R平方值显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Equity in hybrid microeconomics classes: Effects on diverse student groups Measuring economic graph competence Improving student outcomes using automated feedback in a first-year economics class Turn the camera on to get better grade: Evidence from a field experiment Environmental economics in the wild: Using long-form journalism and other mass media in the classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1