Justice and law in the thought of Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860)

Trino Baptista , Sonia Tucci , Félix Angeles
{"title":"Justice and law in the thought of Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860)","authors":"Trino Baptista ,&nbsp;Sonia Tucci ,&nbsp;Félix Angeles","doi":"10.1016/j.fsiml.2021.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) stated that the world has two coexisting dimensions: the Will-side, which is the metaphysical, ideal, and ultimate reality where isolated creatures do not exist; and the Representational side, which Will-powered, self-centered individual phenomenon inhabits. Schopenhauer asserted that in human societies under the imperative of the Will, <em>temporal</em> justice may only aspire to prevent ill-natured actions towards humans and animals. Absolute freedom happens at the metaphysical level of the primeval Will, and an <em>eternal</em> justice exists, because victims and perpetrators belong to the same essence, and their deeds are therefore balanced. In Schopenhauerian terms, the only bridge between <em>temporal</em> and e<em>ternal</em> justice is Will-denial, which leads to compassion and asceticism, and occurs after the awareness of the unity of all living beings. However, Will-denial, by being a strictly individual and unpredictable issue, led to Schopenhauer's pessimism about an enduring collective well-being. Approaching eternal and temporal justices is thus, a worthy quest, which is visible in the current worldwide concern and interest in altruism, cooperation, and compassion. Nevertheless, if this progress is devoid of compassion and asceticism (cooperation and healthy austerity in modern terms) it could lead to increased malicious social control and manipulation. Schopenhauer's thought may thus be part of the philosophical foundations of contemporary forensic psychiatry. This paper discusses these aspects of the philosopher's work, with reference to current ideas and literature in forensic psychiatry, psychology, law, and issues in contemporary physics which are pertinent to this debate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33816,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International Mind and Law","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.fsiml.2021.100065","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International Mind and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666353821000229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788–1860) stated that the world has two coexisting dimensions: the Will-side, which is the metaphysical, ideal, and ultimate reality where isolated creatures do not exist; and the Representational side, which Will-powered, self-centered individual phenomenon inhabits. Schopenhauer asserted that in human societies under the imperative of the Will, temporal justice may only aspire to prevent ill-natured actions towards humans and animals. Absolute freedom happens at the metaphysical level of the primeval Will, and an eternal justice exists, because victims and perpetrators belong to the same essence, and their deeds are therefore balanced. In Schopenhauerian terms, the only bridge between temporal and eternal justice is Will-denial, which leads to compassion and asceticism, and occurs after the awareness of the unity of all living beings. However, Will-denial, by being a strictly individual and unpredictable issue, led to Schopenhauer's pessimism about an enduring collective well-being. Approaching eternal and temporal justices is thus, a worthy quest, which is visible in the current worldwide concern and interest in altruism, cooperation, and compassion. Nevertheless, if this progress is devoid of compassion and asceticism (cooperation and healthy austerity in modern terms) it could lead to increased malicious social control and manipulation. Schopenhauer's thought may thus be part of the philosophical foundations of contemporary forensic psychiatry. This paper discusses these aspects of the philosopher's work, with reference to current ideas and literature in forensic psychiatry, psychology, law, and issues in contemporary physics which are pertinent to this debate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚瑟·叔本华思想中的正义与法律
德国哲学家亚瑟·叔本华(1788-1860)指出,世界有两个共存的维度:意志面,即形而上学的、理想的和终极的现实,在那里孤立的生物不存在;以及代表性的一面,即意志驱动的、以自我为中心的个体现象。叔本华断言,在人类社会中,在意志的命令下,时间正义可能只希望防止对人类和动物的恶意行为。绝对自由发生在原始意志的形而上学层面,永恒的正义存在,因为受害者和犯罪者属于同一本质,因此他们的行为是平衡的。用叔本华的话来说,时间正义和永恒正义之间的唯一桥梁是意志否定,它导致同情和禁欲主义,并发生在意识到所有生命的统一之后。然而,意志否定是一个严格的个人和不可预测的问题,导致叔本华对持久的集体福祉持悲观态度。因此,寻求永恒和暂时的正义是一项有价值的探索,这在当前全世界对利他主义、合作和同情的关注和兴趣中是显而易见的。然而,如果这种进步缺乏同情心和禁欲主义(现代意义上的合作和健康的紧缩),可能会导致恶意的社会控制和操纵加剧。因此,叔本华的思想可能是当代法医精神病学哲学基础的一部分。本文讨论了这位哲学家工作的这些方面,参考了法医精神病学、心理学、法律以及与这场辩论相关的当代物理学问题的当前思想和文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
153 days
期刊最新文献
Expanding horizons through Forensic Science International: Mind and Law - Mental health and justice beyond violent offending Neuroscience and the insanity defense: Trying to put a round peg in a square hole A comparative analysis of public educational needs in the rehabilitative care of individuals who have committed serious criminal offences: A cross cultural study Head injury and associated disability in adults undergoing pre-sentencing assessment by criminal justice social work The emerging influence of Geopsychiatry in Forensic Psychiatry -- from global crises to local jurisdictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1