Swell wave progression in the English Channel: implications for coastal monitoring

IF 1.6 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Anthropocene Coasts Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1139/anc-2021-0008
Thomas Dhoop, Charlie Thompson
{"title":"Swell wave progression in the English Channel: implications for coastal monitoring","authors":"Thomas Dhoop,&nbsp;Charlie Thompson","doi":"10.1139/anc-2021-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Energetic swell waves, particularly when they coincide with high water levels, can present significant coastal hazards. To better understand and predict these risks, analysis of the sea levels and waves that generate these events and the resulting coastal impacts is essential. Two energetic swell events, neither of which were predicted by modelled flood forecasts, occurred in quick succession in the English Channel. The first event, on 30 January 2021, produced moderate significant wave heights at or just below the 0.25 year return period along the southwest English coast, but combined with significant swell caused overtopping at East Beach in West Bay and at Chesil Beach. The second event, on 1 February 2021, generated the highest wave energy periods measured at many locations along the southern English coastline and, at high water, caused waves to run up over the promenades at Poole Bay and Christchurch Bay and caused overtopping at Hayling Island. Both events are described in detail, and their spatial footprints are mapped through a joint return period analysis using a copula function. It is found that typical joint return period analysis of water level and significant wave height underestimates potential impacts, while a joint consideration of water level and wave power (<i>P</i>) describes the 31 January event better and a joint consideration of water level and energy period (<i>T</i><sub>e</sub>) best describes the 1 February event. Therefore, it is recommended that <i>T</i><sub>e</sub> and P are adopted for coastal monitoring purposes, and that future studies further explore the use of both parameters for swell monitoring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100098,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Coasts","volume":"4 1","pages":"281 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1139/anc-2021-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Energetic swell waves, particularly when they coincide with high water levels, can present significant coastal hazards. To better understand and predict these risks, analysis of the sea levels and waves that generate these events and the resulting coastal impacts is essential. Two energetic swell events, neither of which were predicted by modelled flood forecasts, occurred in quick succession in the English Channel. The first event, on 30 January 2021, produced moderate significant wave heights at or just below the 0.25 year return period along the southwest English coast, but combined with significant swell caused overtopping at East Beach in West Bay and at Chesil Beach. The second event, on 1 February 2021, generated the highest wave energy periods measured at many locations along the southern English coastline and, at high water, caused waves to run up over the promenades at Poole Bay and Christchurch Bay and caused overtopping at Hayling Island. Both events are described in detail, and their spatial footprints are mapped through a joint return period analysis using a copula function. It is found that typical joint return period analysis of water level and significant wave height underestimates potential impacts, while a joint consideration of water level and wave power (P) describes the 31 January event better and a joint consideration of water level and energy period (Te) best describes the 1 February event. Therefore, it is recommended that Te and P are adopted for coastal monitoring purposes, and that future studies further explore the use of both parameters for swell monitoring.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英吉利海峡涌浪的发展:对海岸监测的启示
强烈的涌浪,特别是当它们与高水位重合时,可能会对海岸造成重大危害。为了更好地了解和预测这些风险,分析产生这些事件的海平面和波浪以及由此产生的沿海影响至关重要。英吉利海峡接连发生了两次高能涌浪事件,这两次都没有被模拟的洪水预报预测到。第一次事件发生在2021年1月30日,在英格兰西南海岸产生了中等或略低于0.25年一遇的显著浪高,但与显著的涌浪相结合,导致西湾东海滩和Chesil海滩漫顶。第二次事件发生在2021年2月1日,在英格兰南部海岸线的许多地方产生了最高的波浪能周期,在高水位时,波浪在普尔湾和克赖斯特彻奇湾的海滨长廊上掀起,并在海灵岛造成漫顶。详细描述了这两个事件,并通过使用copula函数的联合重现期分析绘制了它们的空间足迹。研究发现,水位和显著波高的典型联合重现期分析低估了潜在影响,而水位和波浪功率(P)的联合考虑更能描述1月31日的事件,水位和能量周期(Te)的联合审议最能描述2月1日的事件。因此,建议采用Te和P进行海岸监测,并在未来的研究中进一步探索使用这两个参数进行涌浪监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Heavy metals in core sediments from the western Bay of Bengal: implications on historical pollution, eco-environmental risks, and potential sources Socio-economic risk assessment of the setback zone in beaches threatened by sea level rise induced retreat (Peloponnese coast- Eastern Mediterranean) Impacts of a growing population on the coastal environment of the Bay of Bengal Mapping coastal resilience: a Gis-based Bayesian network approach to coastal hazard identification for Queensland’s dynamic shorelines Effects of nourished beach morphology on storm response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1